Bitcoin ETF Flows Split as BTC-USD Clings to the $70K Line

Bitcoin ETF flows: stress test for the new bull market narrative

BTC-USD collapses from $126K to the high-$60Ks while ETF demand fractures

BTC-USD drawdown, volatility spike and what that means for ETF demand
Spot BTC-USD has moved from a record above $126,000 in October to roughly $68,000–$70,500 now, wiping out about 45–50% from the peak and more than 25% in the last month alone. The latest leg lower broke the $70,000 psychological level, flushed into the mid-$60Ks, and briefly tagged the $60,000 area before a rebound back near $70,500. That bounce lifted Bitcoin’s market value back over roughly $1.4 trillion, with daily spot and derivatives turnover near $43 billion and liquidations around $189 million over a recent 24-hour window, mostly on the short side as price snapped higher again. At the same time, options open interest has climbed toward 452,000 BTC from about 255,000 BTC after the late-December expiry, while one- and three-month implied volatility has pushed about 10 points higher. Structurally, you now have a market that has already absorbed an estimated $5.2 billion in forced derivatives liquidations over the last two weeks, with open interest still near $34 billion but down almost 30% over a month and more than 45% below the October leverage peak. In other words, the easy late-2025 momentum has been flushed; ETF flows now matter more because leverage is lower and spot demand has to do more of the work.

IBIT – price, AUM and how closely it is shadowing BTC-USD
The iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) on NASDAQ trades around $38.97, up about 5.2% on the day from a $37.05 previous close, inside a $37.89–$39.38 intraday band and a 52-week range of $35.30 to $71.82. After hours, IBIT ticked to $39.14, another 0.44% higher. The fund shows a quoted market cap near $166.25 billion and average daily volume close to 75.9 million shares. That profile tells you two things. First, the ETF still carries enormous scale and liquidity after the correction in BTC-USD. Second, the price response is still very high beta to spot; a near-50% drawdown in the coin has produced a similar compression in the ETF but not an exodus from assets under management. The primary risk is not that IBIT stops tracking; it is that flows turn from long-dated accumulation into stop-and-go rebalancing while volatility remains elevated.

Short-term flows: heavy redemptions, then a thin trickle of new money

Two outflow days close to $700M, then a $24.6M bounce
U.S. listed spot Bitcoin ETFs have just come through a two-day flush that removed about $686 million from the complex. One session saw roughly $410.4 million in redemptions, on top of about $276.3 million the day before. Out of that, IBIT alone lost around $157.6 million in one day, while Fidelity’s FBTC shed about $104.1 million, and legacy products like GBTC and other BTC trusts dropped another ~$92.6 million combined. The headline read-through is simple: into the break toward $60,000 and the failure to hold $70,000, the ETF wrapper stopped absorbing coins and temporarily turned into a net seller. The next day matters though. Net flows flipped modestly positive with about $24.6 million coming back into the group, driven by FBTC pulling in around $12.0 million. That is not a flood of capital, but it breaks the straight-line panic narrative. It tells you some allocators are using weakness to add, but they are doing it cautiously and selectively, while IBIT remains one of the main tools for fast capital to rotate in and out.

February 14 snapshot: ETFs add $15.1M even as IBIT bleeds
Mid-February flow data show another nuance. On one day spot Bitcoin ETFs collectively attracted about $15.1 million of new money. Fidelity’s FBTC led with roughly $12 million of inflows, VanEck’s HODL added close to $1.9 million, and WisdomTree’s BTCW took in around $3.6 million. At the same time BlackRock’s flagship IBIT posted a net outflow near $9.4 million. That combination fits with a market where hedge funds and short-term traders use the deepest-liquidity product to cut risk quickly, while slower-moving investors diversify exposure into smaller vehicles. Flows are not monolithic. IBIT is effectively the “insider tape” for fast capital; the rest of the complex is a cleaner read on advisors and long-horizon allocators.

Medium-term flows: IBIT softness versus a still-positive structural story

Three-month pressure versus a $21B one-year build in IBIT
Over the last three months, IBIT has seen about $2.8 billion of net redemptions. That is real money and confirms that even the largest sponsor is not immune when BTC-USD drops 25% in a month and nearly 50% from its peak. Step back to the one-year window and the picture flips. Since launch, the same ETF has attracted close to $21 billion in net inflows. Even after the recent outflows, the overwhelming majority of capital that came into IBIT is still in the trade. Investors are cutting size, not abandoning the product. For a coin that has traded as low as $60,000 in the current selloff, that retention rate is a key differentiator versus the 2018 or 2022 downcycles, when capital did not have a regulated ETF channel and exits were far more aggressive.

Category-wide numbers: $5.8B out in three months, $14.2B in over a year, $54.3B since launch
The broader U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF group shows the same split. Roughly $5.8 billion has left the category over the last three months, with withdrawals clustering on the ugliest price days. Yet over the past year, net flows are still positive by about $14.2 billion. Since inception, spot BTC ETFs have accumulated around $54.34 billion in net inflows and now hold coins equivalent to roughly 6.3% of BTC-USD’s total market capitalisation. Those are not the numbers you see in a dead market. They describe a maturing asset where investors are starting to trade position size and entry levels inside a long structural allocation, not flip between “all in” and “zero”.

Who is really selling? Fast money versus sticky capital

Hedge funds and basis traders rotate first
Flow behaviour across IBIT and peers lines up with what ETF desks are seeing on the ground. The sharpest redemptions tend to hit the largest, most liquid ETFs that are easiest to short, hedge, or use in basis trades. The natural suspects are hedge funds, prop desks and high-turnover quant strategies. They were early in using ETFs as trading vehicles when BTC-USD set fresh highs above $120,000 and they are first out when volatility spikes and momentum flips. Their selling shows up as blocks of outflows in products like IBIT, even when aggregate category flows stay modestly positive.

Advisors and long-horizon holders are trimming, not capitulating
The slower cohort is financial advisors, private banks and family offices that treat Bitcoin as a single-digit percentage position in diversified portfolios. Their behaviour is written in the 12-month numbers. If this group was bailing, you would see outflows over the last three months approaching the full $14.2 billion that came in over the year. Instead, the majority of that capital remains. Combined with the fact that whale wallets added about 53,000 BTC, or roughly $3.7–$3.8 billion, during the latest selloff, the conclusion is clear: the margin of selling is dominated by tactical players; balance-sheet-style buyers and whales are still willing to accumulate on weakness.

Cross-asset check: Ethereum ETFs confirm this is rebalancing, not a structural exit

Four weeks of ETH ETF outflows, then a small positive day
Spot Ethereum ETFs offer a second data point. Into mid-February they recorded about $161 million of net outflows in one week, the fourth negative week in a row, with two sessions alone seeing withdrawals of roughly $129 million and $113 million. The 30-day simple moving average of net flows has stayed negative for about three months. Yet even there, the pattern is not one-way. A daily print around $10.3 million in net inflows broke the streak of red days, even as one product like the Bitwise ETH ETF logged about $6.2 million in fresh outflows. ETF investors are actively resizing rather than walking away. That mirrors the Bitcoin pattern and underscores that what you are looking at is a broad risk-asset de-risking phase, not a specific repudiation of the ETF structure.

Lessons from ETH flows for BTC-USD and IBIT
The ETH data reinforce a key point for BTC-USD analysis. ETF flows are powerful accelerators near key price zones, but they sit on top of macro conditions, on-chain activity and derivatives positioning. When rates, the dollar and equity volatility all move the wrong way, both Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs will show red prints. When those macro headwinds soften, the same vehicles can flip back to large inflows very quickly. That dynamic is exactly what you saw in January 2024 on launch and again during the Q4 2025 rally. There is no sign in the numbers that the ETF channel has broken; it is simply reacting to the same macro stress that is pressuring tech stocks and high-beta trades.

Banks and issuers: ING Germany, Bitwise, VanEck and the second wave of distribution

ING Germany’s campaign: zero-fee Bitwise trades above €1,000
While U.S. flows wobble, banks in Europe are still expanding their crypto lines. ING’s German arm has added ETPs and ETNs from Bitwise and VanEck to a lineup that already included products from 21Shares, WisdomTree and BlackRock. To jump-start adoption, ING Germany is running a promotion where clients placing orders of at least €1,000 in Bitwise ETPs pay no transaction fee; smaller tickets pay a flat €4.60 commission. The offer covers Bitwise’s Core Bitcoin ETP (BTC1), its MSCI Digital Assets Select 20 ETP (DA20) and its Physical Ethereum ETP (ZETH). This is classic retail on-ramp behaviour: lower the friction and let the bank’s mass-affluent base test the product at reduced cost.

Why this matters for IBIT and U.S. spot ETFs
For IBIT and its U.S. peers, the ING campaign is important because it shows that even as short-term U.S. flows wobble, large banks elsewhere are still positioning for a world where regulated Bitcoin exposure is a normal shelf product. That long game is what underpins the $54.34 billion of net inflows since launch. Every European bank that signs distribution deals with issuers like Bitwise Asset Management and VanEck effectively extends the global demand base for the same underlying story: tokenised exposure to a finite-supply asset that can sit next to gold and equities in a portfolio.

Derivatives, whale wallets and the key BTC-USD zones that drive ETF flows

From 2017 and 2021 corrections to the 2024–2026 pattern
Looking at previous bull phases, the current drawdown sits well inside historic norms. In 2017 mid-cycle corrections often ranged between 30% and 40% and took a median ~45 days to repair. In 2021, typical pullbacks sat in the 20–30% band with a recovery closer to 30 days. The 2024–2025 post-halving phase has so far seen 15–25% drawdowns. The difference now is the size of the derivatives and ETF layers sitting on top. When funding rates are moderately positive and the street is long futures, a clean break of a level like $69,000 triggers liquidations and forced selling into the ETF wrapper, amplifying moves. When that leverage is cleared, as it has been with billions in liquidations, ETF flows can revert to reflecting genuine spot demand.

Whale accumulation versus ETF redemptions
During the recent leg down from the high-$90Ks toward the $60K handle, wallets holding more than 1,000 BTC accumulated about 53,000 coins. That is roughly $3.7–$3.8 billion of net buying at current prices, the largest such accumulation burst since November. Set that against roughly $686 million of ETF outflows over two days and around $5.8 billion across three months. The message is simple. Some institutional money is downsizing via ETFs; a different cohort of large holders is stepping in on chain to take the other side. For IBIT, that means the ETF is not the only channel absorbing supply. The coin can base even while ETF prints look ugly, because spot buyers outside the wrapper are active.

ETF flows as the new ‘insider tape’ – and why classic insider data do not exist here

No Form-4s, so you read ETFs and whales instead
In a stock you can read Form-4 insider filings and watch executives or major shareholders buying or selling. Bitcoin has no board, no management incentives, and no legal “insider” category. The closest functional equivalents are ETF flows and large on-chain moves. When IBIT and other spot ETFs show sustained inflows during weakness, that is the market’s way of saying that regulated capital is adding exposure. When whale wallets build positions into a selloff, that is behavioural confirmation. When both turn negative at the same time, you get air-pocket price action like the slide from above $90K to $60K. Right now the tape is mixed: short bursts of heavy ETF redemptions, interspersed with modest inflow days, set against meaningful whale accumulation and still-elevated AUM.

Macro and regulation: why flows are weak even as structure improves

Rates, dollar and regulation still set the backdrop
The flows around BTC-USD cannot be separated from the macro backdrop. Rising or sticky policy rates, a firm dollar and choppy equity indices all push capital out of high-beta assets. On top of that, regulators in the United States and European Union are still rolling out new rule sets, from MiCA-style frameworks in Europe to evolving ETF guidance in the U.S. That uncertainty compresses risk budgets. Against that backdrop, the fact that U.S. spot ETFs still hold about 6.3% of Bitcoin’s market cap and have netted more than $54 billion since launch is not a sign of weakness; it is a sign that the wrapper has already become embedded in mainstream asset allocation, even if flows oscillate around macro news.

Buy, sell or hold: a hard verdict on BTC-USD and IBIT flows

Positioning view: high-volatility Buy, not a structural Sell
Pull everything together. BTC-USD is roughly 45–50% below its all-time high, after a month where price dropped more than 25% and briefly tested $60,000. U.S. spot ETFs have seen about $5.8 billion in redemptions over three months, including a two-day $686 million hit where IBIT alone lost roughly $157.6 million. At the same time, IBIT still sits near $166 billion in assets, with about $21 billion of net inflows over a year, while the entire ETF complex stands on ~$54.34 billion of net inflows and ownership near 6.3% of total supply. Whale wallets have quietly added around 53,000 BTC during the drop. European banks like ING Germany are still rolling out fee-discount campaigns for Bitwise and VanEck products. ETH ETFs show similar short-term outflows but no structural collapse in demand. That is not a backdrop that justifies calling the trade dead. It describes a violent reset inside an ongoing adoption cycle. On that basis, the flows argue for a stance of “Buy on weakness” rather than “Sell into fear”. The practical read is a high-risk Buy bias for BTC-USD, with staged entries concentrated between roughly $60,000 and $68,000, and a neutral to moderately bullish view on IBIT itself as the primary regulated vehicle for that exposure. The volatility is real and the drawdown is deep, but the flow and AUM data do not support a long-term bearish verdict; they point to a market that is bruised, not broken.

That's TradingNEWS