Bitcoin ETF Shock: $3.8B Exodus As IBIT ETF Slides Toward Lows And BTC-USD Defends $64K
Spot Bitcoin ETFs like IBIT at $36.42 sit near the bottom of their range while BTC holds around $64K, institutional flows rotate into Bitcoin | That's TradingNEWS
Bitcoin ETF Flows: Risk-Off Pain, Bitcoin Still Owns The Institutional Channel
BTC-USD And IBIT Under Pressure At The Same Time Capital Still Prefers Bitcoin Over Everything Else
Bitcoin (BTC-USD) is trading in the mid-$64,000s after a sharp risk-off move driven by tariff headlines and geopolitical noise. The ETF side reflects the hit in real time. The iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) closed near $36.42, down 5.21% on the day, with a range between $36.20 and $37.56 versus a previous close at $38.42. Over the last year IBIT has traded between $35.30 and $71.82, so price is now pinned near the bottom of that band while the fund still shows a market cap around $165.73 billion and average volume close to 75.95 million shares.
That tape tells you two things at once. First, Bitcoin is being treated as a high-beta macro asset when tariffs and geopolitical risk explode. Second, even on a day with a 5% drawdown in IBIT and BTC-USD, liquidity in the ETF wrapper is deep, spreads stay efficient, and large pools of capital can move in or out without going near spot exchanges or OTC desks.
From Peak AUM To A $3.8 Billion Five-Week Outflow: How The Bitcoin ETF Trade Got Repriced
At the late-2024 peak, the U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF complex held over $85 billion in assets across eleven products. That phase ended abruptly in March–April 2025, when the group went through its first real stress event. Across five consecutive weeks, net redemptions reached roughly $3.8 billion, the longest and heaviest outflow streak since launch.
The outflow curve was driven by a sequence of shocks rather than any single trigger. The October 2024 episode – a 25% slide in BTC-USD over two weeks after solvency fears at several large offshore exchanges – forced risk committees to treat Bitcoin as still highly exposed to operational and counterparty shocks. That repricing of risk set up the ETF segment for what came next.
In March 2025 the unwind accelerated. The week ending March 7 saw about $650 million leave spot ETFs as the October correction’s volatility spillover rolled through risk models. The following week added roughly $720 million more redemptions after Bitcoin sliced through major long-term moving averages, triggering systematic de-risking. By March 21, as U.S.–Iran tensions escalated, redemptions approached $950 million for the week. A week later, a broad global tariff push was announced, and ETF investors pulled another $820 million. The week ending April 4 added about $660 million more outflows as risk-off positioning became the default stance rather than a tactical hedge.
What matters is not just the $3.8 billion figure but the behavior it reveals. Large allocators used spot Bitcoin ETFs as the primary exit door, exactly because those vehicles are regulated, liquid and operationally simple. That cemented the role of ETFs as the institutional throttle on BTC-USD exposure: when volatility regimes flip, money leaves through these wrappers first.
Macro Shock, Technical Damage And Why Outflows Do Not Equal Structural Failure
The outflow streak came alongside a classic macro regime shift. Rising U.S.–Iran friction, a sweeping tariff agenda and renewed concerns around global growth triggered the usual flight-to-quality rotation. Capital moved from volatile assets into Treasury ETFs and money-market funds, and Bitcoin, via its spot ETFs, was treated like any other high-beta risk line.
At the same time Bitcoin’s own technical profile deteriorated. BTC-USD broke below long-term moving averages in March, which set off mechanical selling from rules-based and volatility-targeting strategies. That selling fed back into ETF flows: price breaks validated redemptions, redemptions added downward pressure on price, and the loop reinforced a cautious stance.
Despite that, the ETF structure proved robust. A drawdown of around 4.5% of peak AUM is significant but far from catastrophic. Daily trading volumes remained high, market-making stayed orderly, and there was no sign of structural stress inside the ETF plumbing. On-chain, long-term holder addresses barely moved relative to ETF outflows, showing that core Bitcoin balance-sheet capital did not capitulate in the same way. In Europe and other regions, Bitcoin ETP flows were more stable, underlining that the U.S. outflow burst was primarily a local risk-management decision, not a global rejection of BTC-USD.
Friday’s Flows: Bitcoin Products Still Capture The Only Real Demand
Recent flow data confirms that Bitcoin ETFs remain the only part of the crypto ETP stack that consistently attracts capital, even in a shaky market. The most recent Friday session showed spot Bitcoin funds taking the bulk of new inflows again, while Ethereum and diversified altcoin ETFs printed flat or modest redemptions.
The key point is not that inflows are massive; it is that the direction is still positive for Bitcoin-only vehicles. Allocators are clearly reallocating within the digital-asset bucket rather than abandoning it outright. Every marginal dollar prefers pure BTC-USD exposure over any mixed or alt-heavy product. That tells you where institutional conviction remains when volatility and tariffs dominate the tape.
Altcoin Capitulation: $209 Billion Of Net Spot Selling As Bitcoin ETFs Drain Liquidity
The ETF rotation into Bitcoin (BTC-USD) is mirrored by brutal spot behavior across the rest of the market. A broad Cumulative Buy/Sell Difference metric for altcoins (excluding Ethereum) has turned roughly –$209 billion over the last 13 months, meaning that taker-side selling has dominated buying by that amount in spot markets. That is not a short-term flush; it is a structural distribution phase.
At the same time, analysis of corporate and institutional digital-asset treasuries points to roughly $800 billion of capital that historically chased altcoin beta now sitting in more formal, balance-sheet-driven exposures. Pair that with persistent inflows into Bitcoin ETFs, and the liquidity hierarchy becomes clear.
Depth in non-Bitcoin pairs is thin and price impact is high. When sellers hit those books, there is not enough opposite demand to absorb size cleanly. That is why altcoin underperformance is so severe while BTC-USD still trades with deep two-way liquidity and tighter spreads. ETF flows and spot flow metrics tell the same story: liquidity, conviction and scale have migrated up the stack into Bitcoin, leaving the long tail of tokens in a five-year extreme net-sell regime.
Read More
-
FDVV ETF Price Tests $60 Ceiling as Dividend Flows Drive $10B AUM
23.02.2026 · TradingNEWS ArchiveStocks
-
XRP ETF Flows Clash With Fear: XRPI $7.75, XRPR $11.09 After $53M Hit
23.02.2026 · TradingNEWS ArchiveCrypto
-
Natural Gas Futures Price Forecast - NG Jump on US Winter Storm, But Bears Still Aim at $2.60
23.02.2026 · TradingNEWS ArchiveCommodities
-
USD/JPY Price Forecast - USDJPY Slides From 155.65 High as Tariff Shock and Policy Split Pull Pair Toward 154
23.02.2026 · TradingNEWS ArchiveForex
Ethereum And The Rest: Weak Technicals Underline The Bitcoin-First Allocation Bias
Ethereum (ETH-USD) has not managed to hold its leadership role in this environment. Price recently traded near $2,018.84, with 30-day volatility around 18.04%, sitting clearly below the 50-day simple moving average at $2,731.34 and the 200-day at $3,254.75. The 14-day RSI around 35.5 signals that ETH is edging toward oversold, but the failure to reclaim either moving average keeps the trend firmly pressured.
Thirteen positive closes out of the last thirty sessions show there is dip-buying, but the inability to regain key levels signals lack of sustained institutional conviction versus BTC-USD. On the ETF side, Ethereum products show flat flows or modest outflows, and altcoin baskets remain weak. The asset that still commands structural demand through regulated wrappers is Bitcoin, not ETH and certainly not the long tail of coins. That relative behavior is exactly what a Bitcoin-first institutional allocation framework looks like in practice.
IBIT As Institutional Thermometer: Price Near The Bottom Of The Range, Liquidity Intact
The IBIT tape encapsulates how large allocators are now treating Bitcoin. With price at $36.42, down $2.00 on the day, the ETF is trading just above its 52-week low at $35.30 and far below its $71.82 high. Yet market cap remains around $165.73 billion, and average daily volume of roughly 75.95 million shares keeps the fund firmly in the ultra-liquid bracket.
That combination – depressed price, high liquidity, tight spreads – is exactly what a re-risking entry point looks like for asset managers who think in terms of ranges and macro windows, not hourly candles. IBIT has already proven its role as the fast exit door during the five-week, $3.8 billion outflow wave. The same mechanics make it the obvious vehicle when those same desks decide to rebuild BTC-USD exposure once tariffs, rates and geopolitical shocks stop deteriorating.
The fact that ETF volumes remain robust even on heavy down days also matters. This is not a market drying up; it is a market where risk is being repriced through a liquid, regulated instrument that sits comfortably inside traditional OMS and risk stacks.
Bitcoin ETF Flows, BTC Dominance And The New Liquidity Stack In Crypto
The post-ETF structure of the digital-asset market is now clear, and it sits on three key indicators. BTC dominance tracks how much of the total crypto market cap sits in Bitcoin. As dominance grinds higher, capital is concentrating in BTC-USD and leaving smaller tokens behind. The recent behavior – heavy altcoin net selling and relatively better resilience in BTC-USD – is exactly what a rising-dominance regime looks like.
Second, net flows into Bitcoin ETFs act as the high-frequency gauge of institutional stance. Sustained positive prints, even moderate ones, alongside negative or flat altcoin flows show that professional capital is not abandoning the space; it is consolidating into the most liquid, most regulated asset in the stack. The earlier $3.8 billion exodus was the exception driven by a violent macro reset; the current pattern of selective BTC inflows points to a more mature, risk-controlled allocation.
Third, the Cumulative Buy/Sell Difference across altcoins confirms whether speculative spot demand is back. With a –$209 billion profile over roughly 13 months, that indicator is still firmly in distribution territory. Until it stabilizes and starts to flatten, relief rallies in smaller tokens are likely to fade quickly while Bitcoin continues to attract the bulk of any new institutional flow through IBIT and its peers.
Verdict On Bitcoin ETF Flows And BTC-USD: High-Conviction Hold With Buy Zones Emerging For Structured Capital
Putting the pieces together, Bitcoin (BTC-USD) and the ETF complex are in a classic risk-off repricing, not a structural breakdown. The segment has absorbed a $3.8 billion, five-week outflow event, is trading significantly below peak prices in both spot and ETF form, and yet still commands the only consistent inflows in the digital-asset ETP universe. IBIT at $36.42, near its yearly floor and far below its $71.82 high, offers clean, liquid exposure for mandates that need a regulated wrapper.
At the same time, altcoins are showing a five-year extreme in net spot selling of about $209 billion, Ethereum is trading below both key moving averages, and ETF flows confirm that everything outside Bitcoin is being treated as expendable risk until macro conditions stabilize. That backdrop makes the current tape a high-conviction hold for BTC-USD and a gradual buy zone for portfolios that can tolerate volatility and allocate through structures like IBIT instead of chasing illiquid beta.
The message from flows, pricing and structure is straightforward. Bitcoin has migrated from speculative experiment to the core digital asset institutions are willing to defend through ETFs, even when tariffs, geopolitics and rate fears push risk assets lower across the board.