Bitcoin Price Forecast: BTC-USD at $68,000 and Analysts Are Calling for Another 30% Drop

Bitcoin (BTC-USD) at $68,000: The Bear Market Has a Number and It Points Lower

Bitcoin (BTC-USD) is trading around $68,000 — down roughly 46% from its all-time high of $126,000 hit in October 2025. That peak came approximately 18 months after the April 2024 halving event, tracking the four-year cycle with near-textbook precision. The bounce to $74,000 midweek was swiftly rejected, and the late-week selloff back below $68,000 confirmed what the options market and on-chain data have been signaling for months: this is not a dip to buy. This is a bear market with further room to fall.

CK Zheng, founder of crypto investment firm ZX Squared Capital, put a number on it. He expects an additional 30% decline from current levels in 2026, citing the Iran war as the trigger that accelerated the cycle's next leg down. A 30% drop from $68,000 puts Bitcoin near $47,600 — a level not seen since 2023. Zheng's argument is structural, not just technical. The four-year boom-and-bust cycle, anchored by the halving's supply reduction mechanics and amplified by predictable retail investor psychology, has proven nearly impossible to break. Retail buyers flood in during euphoria and capitulate during panic, mechanically reinforcing the same pattern every four years. The October 2025 top, the 18-month halving lag, the current bear phase — it is all playing out on schedule.

The Four-Year Cycle Is Not a Theory — It Is a Track Record

The halving mechanism is simple: every four years, the Bitcoin network cuts its block reward in half. The most recent halving in April 2024 reduced the block reward to 3.125 BTC, down from 6.25 BTC. Historically, Bitcoin peaks 16 to 18 months post-halving and then enters a bear market lasting roughly a year. The October 2025 top was exactly 18 months after the April 2024 halving. The current drawdown of approximately 46% tracks prior bear market cycles closely. If this cycle mirrors its predecessors, the bottom has not yet been reached. Zheng's 30% additional downside projection is not extreme within the context of prior cycles — it is actually conservative compared to the 80%-plus drawdowns seen in 2018 and 2022.

What makes this cycle more dangerous than prior ones is the macro backdrop. In 2018 and 2022, the macro environment — while difficult — did not include a hot war shutting down one of the world's most critical oil shipping corridors, $90 crude, a jobs market shedding 92,000 positions in a single month, and a Federal Reserve with its hands tied by simultaneous inflation and growth risks. Bitcoin has historically been sensitive to dollar strength and risk appetite. The U.S. dollar index posted its best weekly gain since August, up 1.4% this week. That is a direct headwind for every dollar-denominated risk asset, and Bitcoin is firmly in that category.

On-Chain Reality: 43% of Supply Is Underwater

The Glassnode data is unambiguous. Approximately 43% of Bitcoin's circulating supply is currently held at a loss — meaning nearly half of all coins in existence were purchased at prices higher than today's $68,000. This creates a structural overhang: every time Bitcoin rallies, those underwater holders face the temptation to exit and recover cost basis, which mechanically caps any recovery. The midweek spike to $74,000 demonstrated this precisely — buyers who purchased between $68,000 and $74,000 in recent weeks immediately began taking profits, collapsing the price back down. On-chain data from CryptoQuant confirmed that short-term holders were cashing out rapidly after the brief jump to $74,000, with profit-taking accelerating into the rally rather than following it.

The one counter-signal worth noting: a sharp rise in stablecoin inflows suggests a pool of sidelined capital that has not yet re-entered the market. Stablecoin accumulation typically precedes buying activity, and if geopolitical conditions stabilize even temporarily, that capital could create a bounce. But a bounce and a trend reversal are not the same thing.

The Options Market: Divided Sentiment With a Bearish Undercurrent

CME Group Bitcoin options data tells a nuanced but ultimately cautious story. The 25-delta implied volatility for puts peaked at 95% on February 5, 2026 — the highest reading since 2022 — while call IV reached 75% simultaneously. Both figures have since moderated, but put IV remains significantly elevated relative to the 2025 average of 46%, signaling that the market has not fully absorbed the downside risk. The 25-delta risk reversal fell to -19.34 on February 5, its most negative reading since 2022, indicating the strongest preference for put protection over call exposure in more than three years.

Looking at open interest by expiry reveals a split personality. The March expiry shows a call-to-put OI ratio of approximately 3:1, with $660 million in call open interest against $240 million in puts — a positioning that suggests some participants are betting on a Q1 recovery toward or above $80,000. The $80,000 call strike carries particularly high open interest, making it a focal point for both buyers and sellers. However, the June expiry flips the picture entirely, with higher put open interest than calls — a sign that medium-term conviction is bearish even among those positioned for a near-term bounce. The concentration of put OI between $60,000 and $90,000, with particularly heavy positioning at $60,000 and $80,000, tells you where professional risk managers see the danger zones. At $68,000 current spot, the $60,000 put strike is well within striking distance.

The Treasury Pressure: Digital Asset Firms May Be Forced to Sell

Zheng raised a risk that the mainstream narrative has largely ignored: forced selling from Digital Asset Treasury companies. These are firms — Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) being the most prominent — that have accumulated Bitcoin as a corporate treasury asset, often financed through convertible notes and equity raises. The total size of crypto ETFs and Digital Asset Treasury companies represents only approximately 10% of the entire crypto market capitalization. But if debt servicing requirements tighten — and they will tighten as Bitcoin's price declines and financing costs rise — some of these firms could be forced to liquidate holdings to service obligations. That selling would not be discretionary. It would be mechanical, arriving regardless of market conditions, and it could create the kind of cascading forced liquidation that makes bear markets genuinely destructive rather than merely painful.

The Fed, AI Layoffs, and the Macro Pressure on BTC-USD

The Federal Reserve is the wildcard that could either extend the bear market or cut it short. Traders are currently pricing approximately a 50% probability of a June rate cut, according to the CME FedWatch tool. Under normal circumstances, a rate cut would be bullish for Bitcoin — lower rates reduce the attractiveness of yield-bearing assets, push capital toward speculative instruments, and historically correlate with BTC price appreciation. But the current environment is not normal. The Iran war has sent oil past $90 per barrel, creating an inflation spike that the Fed cannot ignore even as the labor market deteriorates. With 92,000 jobs lost in February against expectations of 50,000 gained, and with AI-driven layoffs accelerating — Block CEO Jack Dorsey cut 40% of his company's workforce explicitly citing AI replacing human labor — the Fed faces a scenario where cutting rates would add fuel to an already burning inflation fire while holding would deepen the economic contraction.

Arthur Hayes, co-founder of BitMex and head of the Maelstrom family office, has argued that this exact scenario — an AI financial crisis forcing emergency Fed money printing — will ultimately be the catalyst that sends Bitcoin to $200,000 and beyond. His logic tracks the 2023 regional banking crisis playbook: when the system breaks, central banks print, and printed money historically flows into hard assets including Bitcoin. Hayes has extended his prediction to $500,000 by end of 2026 as the Trump administration floods the economy with liquidity ahead of midterm elections. These are aggressive numbers, and they require a specific sequence of events — crisis, then printing, then Bitcoin bid — that may take considerably longer to play out than the bull case assumes.

Trump's Clarity Act Support: Regulatory Tailwind That Cannot Overcome Macro Headwinds

One genuinely positive development this week: President Trump publicly endorsed the Clarity Act, market structure legislation for digital assets, calling for its urgent passage in a Truth Social post. This is meaningful long-term for the crypto regulatory framework — clarity on digital asset classification, trading rules, and stablecoin regulation would lower the compliance barrier for institutional capital. Bitcoin briefly jumped toward $73,000 on Wednesday in part as a reaction to Trump's endorsement, alongside a general midweek risk-on mood. But the rally failed to hold. Regulatory progress is a slow-moving structural tailwind. It cannot override $90 crude, a jobs shock, and a risk-off macro environment operating in real time. The Clarity Act may be bullish for Bitcoin in 2027. It is not sufficient to turn the tide in March 2026.

Bitcoin vs. Gold: The Safe Haven Argument Is Dead

One comparison demands addressing directly. Since Bitcoin hit its October 2025 high above $126,000, the price has fallen approximately 46%. Over that same period, gold is up roughly 30%. Gold (GC=F) closed Friday at $5,158.70, up 1.58% on the session even as Bitcoin fell more than 4%. When genuine fear enters markets — real war, real inflation, real labor market deterioration — institutional capital moves to gold, not Bitcoin. The Bitcoin-as-digital-gold narrative is not just weakened. It is empirically disproven by this exact moment in market history. Bitcoin is a risk asset. It trades like a risk asset. It sells off with risk assets. The only circumstance under which that changes is one where the Fed begins an aggressive easing cycle that compresses real yields broadly — and that scenario is months away at minimum, conditional on conditions that have not yet materialized.

The Verdict: Bearish, With a Target Range of $47,000 to $55,000

The weight of the evidence points one direction. The four-year cycle is on schedule and has historically not bottomed until 12 to 18 months after the peak — which puts the cycle low somewhere between October 2026 and April 2027. The macro backdrop is the worst combination possible for a speculative risk asset: surging inflation from oil, weakening employment, a paralyzed Federal Reserve, and a strengthening dollar. On-chain data shows 43% of supply underwater and short-term holders exiting every rally. The options market shows sustained put preference in the medium term despite near-term call positioning. Forced selling from Digital Asset Treasury companies represents an underappreciated downside risk. And the $74,000 rejection this week confirmed that any rally attempt faces immediate overhead supply.

The near-term support to watch is $60,000, which carries the heaviest put open interest concentration and represents a prior technical level. A break below $60,000 opens the door to Zheng's $47,000 to $48,000 target — approximately 30% below current levels. This is a sell or avoid at current prices. Cash or gold is the superior position in this environment. Any allocation to Bitcoin should be sized for the possibility of a continued 30% decline, not positioned around the hope of a Fed pivot that may not arrive until late 2026 at the earliest.

That's TradingNEWS