Bitcoin ETF Inflows Still Top $53B as BTC-USD Holds $67K and IBIT ETF Tracks the Reset

Bitcoin, BTC-USD and the ETF machine: from accumulation to visible distribution

BTC-USD has moved from a phase of aggressive ETF-driven accumulation to a clear period of distribution. After topping near $126,000 in October, the price now trades around $67,000–$68,000, a drawdown of roughly 47% from the peak. At the same time, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs have reduced their combined holdings by about 100,300 BTC, cutting aggregate balances to roughly 1.26 million BTC. At current prices this represents around $6.7–$6.8 billion of supply recycled back into the market, the largest balance contraction of this cycle. Redemptions have been persistent rather than sporadic. Over the last five weeks, net outflows are just under $4 billion, with weekly withdrawals of about $403.9 million, $359.9 million, $318.1 million, $1.49 billion and $1.33 billion since mid-January. Even with that headwind, Bitcoin is still holding in the high-$60Ks and briefly reclaimed levels above $68,000, but the message is clear: the easy ETF-momentum leg is over and flows are now testing the market instead of continuously supporting it.

IBIT – iShares Bitcoin Trust as Wall Street’s BTC proxy

iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) on NASDAQ remains the central vehicle for listed Bitcoin exposure. IBIT trades around $38.04, effectively flat on the day versus a previous close of $38.07, after moving between $37.72 and $38.61 in the latest session. The 52-week range of $35.30–$71.82 tells you how aggressive the previous cycle was and how deep the reset has already gone, with IBIT now about 47% below its high, mirroring the drawdown in BTC-USD from $126,000. With a quoted market capitalization close to $169.49 billion, IBIT is effectively a barometer for how far large pools of capital are willing to stay committed to Bitcoin at this stage. During 2025, allocations into IBIT and its peers helped drive the push to six figures. Now the same wrapper is being used to trim exposure, recycle risk into cash, and rebalance toward other themes such as Ethereum spot products and AI-heavy equity baskets. IBIT is no longer just a one-way inflow story; it is the main channel for both entry and exit.

From ETF accumulation to ETF distribution: 100,300 BTC out, $53 billion still in

Across all U.S. spot products, ETF balances have dropped by approximately 100,300 BTC since the October top, taking total holdings to roughly 1.26 million BTC. In January alone, around $1.6 billion left these structures, extending a redemption streak that began in November 2025. Parallel to that, broader digital-asset investment funds have recorded four straight weeks of redemptions worth about $3.7 billion, showing that the adjustment is not confined to one issuer or one wrapper. Even so, the structural picture remains skewed to the upside. Cumulative net inflows into U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs are still near $53 billion, down from a peak above $63 billion in October but far beyond the $5–15 billion inflow band many ETF desks initially pencilled in for the first year. That means roughly $8 billion of AUM has bled out from the peak, but the street is still sitting on a multi-tens-of-billions long position through listed vehicles. The current phase is a large, but controlled, balance-sheet reset rather than a collapse of the ETF narrative.

Underwater cost basis: ETF buyers sitting on ~20% paper losses

The average entry price for U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF participants sits around $83,980 per BTC. With BTC-USD now trading close to $67,000–$67,500, that cohort is carrying unrealized losses of roughly 20% on average. This explains the sensitivity of flows to every downtick. Products that were comfortably in the green when Bitcoin held above $90,000 are now showing red P&L, which mechanically encourages de-risking from allocators with low tolerance for drawdowns. Meanwhile, the overall crypto-fund space has seen around $3.7 billion of outflows over four consecutive weeks, not just in Bitcoin strategies but across multi-asset and altcoin mandates as well. The result is a market where listed vehicles are still significant holders but no longer in a purely supportive position; they can turn into incremental sellers whenever price rallies fail to pull that cost basis back into positive territory.

Derivatives, leverage and the “panic premium” in BTC options

Futures and options show a market that has stepped back from the edge but is not fully relaxed. Bitcoin slid to a local low near $65,600 before rebounding to around $67,000–$68,000, a gain of about 3.9% off the trough and roughly 2% in the latest overnight move. At the same time, open interest in Bitcoin derivatives has risen to about $15.8 billion, indicating that the sharpest part of the leverage flush is behind and participants are slowly rebuilding positions. Funding rates, which had been neutral to negative during the worst of the selloff, have flipped back to flat-to-positive across major venues and climbed toward double-digit annualized levels, in some cases around 10%, on platforms such as Bybit and Hyperliquid. On the options side, short-dated protection remains expensive. The one-week 25-delta skew has pushed up to around 17%, reflecting elevated demand for downside hedges despite an implied-volatility term structure that sits in modest backwardation, with longer maturities stabilizing near 49%. Approximately $179 million of positions were liquidated over 24 hours, with about $59 million in Bitcoin, $46 million in Ethereum and $16 million across other names, split roughly 56% longs and 44% shorts. A visible liquidation cluster sits around $68,400 on the Binance heatmap, marking a level where further upside could start to squeeze late sellers. The combination of rising open interest, positive funding and elevated short-term skew defines a market that has moved off the lows but is still paying a “panic premium” for immediate insurance.

Macro rotation: gold strength, AI equity mania and political risk dilute BTC’s bid

Bitcoin is not trading in isolation. The current phase lands in a macro environment where alternative risk assets and classic hedges are competing directly for flows. On the store-of-value side, a forceful rally in gold has pulled attention and capital back into the traditional inflation hedge, reducing the urgency to pay up for BTC-USD as “digital gold” at a time when spot sits far below its October peak. At the same time, AI-linked equities remain one of the strongest momentum trades in global markets, attracting speculative capital that, in a different cycle, might have chased Bitcoin instead. This shift is visible in the comments of institutional analysts who highlight investors rotating toward AI-heavy stock baskets while trimming crypto exposure. Political and regulatory noise adds another layer. High-profile figures in Washington have openly pushed back against any suggestion of a Bitcoin backstop and are pressing the Treasury and the Federal Reserve to rule out explicit or implicit bailouts. That framing reinforces the perception of Bitcoin as a pure risk asset that will not receive policy support if volatility spikes, which can harden risk limits at large institutions just as ETF investors are nursing 20% drawdowns on their average cost.

Reset or structural damage: what the ETF outflows are really signaling

The five-week outflow streak, the 100,300 BTC reduction in balances and the $6.8–8 billion swing in ETF assets have triggered a predictable debate about whether Wall Street’s Bitcoin experiment is stalling. The numbers do not support a structural-damage story yet. Cumulative inflows near $53 billion, even after the pullback from the $63 billion October peak, imply that the core allocation thesis remains intact. The current phase looks far more like a “controlled reset” than a capitulation. Leveraged and tactical allocators are reducing exposure as price trades well below $84,000, where the average ETF cost basis sits, while longer-horizon holders maintain positions. That split is consistent with the behavior of other risk products: short-term money cuts back when volatility rises, while sticky capital sizes positions to ride multiple cycles. On-chain and flow analysts also point out that ETF redemptions largely mirror price action rather than driving it. When BTC-USD sells off, outflows accelerate; when the market stabilizes, redemptions slow and, at times, flip back to modest inflows. In that sense, ETFs have acted more as an amplifier of broader market weakness than as an independent source of structural selling. The key test now is whether Bitcoin can reclaim and hold levels that force a large chunk of ETF capital back above its cost basis and neutralize the incentive to keep redeeming.

BTC-USD and IBIT: tactical roadmap, key levels and directional stance

Right now BTC-USD is still locked in a pattern of lower highs and lower lows, with $72,000 emerging as the critical pivot that needs to be reclaimed on a closing basis to signal a durable break of the current downtrend. While Bitcoin has recovered from the $65,600 local low and is trading near $67,000–$68,000, that move alone does not change the broader structure. As long as price remains capped below the $72,000 region and ETF balances continue to drift lower from 1.26 million BTC, the environment remains corrective rather than impulsively bullish. For IBIT, the same logic applies. Trading around $38 within a 52-week band of $35.30–$71.82, the ETF is sitting roughly in the lower half of its range with a cost basis for the average holder near the equivalent of $83,980 per BTC. That mix of underwater P&L, still-elevated short-dated option premia and rising, but not euphoric, futures open interest argues for a neutral-to-constructive stance rather than outright aggression. The directional bias here is cautious bullish with a bias to HOLD rather than outright BUY or SELL. The upside case strengthens materially if BTC-USD can reclaim and hold above $72,000 while ETF outflows slow and IBIT pushes decisively away from the mid-$30s. The downside risk is that a break back below the mid-$60Ks, combined with continued redemptions and sustained unrealized losses near 20%, could trigger another leg of de-leveraging that drags both Bitcoin and the major ETFs toward deeper support. Until one of those scenarios resolves, the ETF complex is signaling a market in consolidation: structurally supported by $53 billion of net inflows over two years, but still working through a sizeable, and very visible, risk reset.

That's TradingNEWS