Ethereum Price Forecast: Whales Load $18.7B as ETH-USD Fights to Hold $1,800 Support

Ethereum (ETH-USD) Price Structure And Market Context

Ethereum (ETH-USD) is trading in the low-$1,900s after a sharp leg down from the ~$3,400 area earlier this year, with the latest rebound built on a defense of the $1,730–$1,800 demand zone. The broader crypto tape is still risk-off: Bitcoin (BTC-USD) broke and closed below a key consolidation floor at $65,729, briefly tagging around $62,510 and now retesting that breakdown level from below, while a failure there keeps the door open toward $60,000. XRP (XRP-USD) slipped below a falling-wedge trendline, nearly touched weekly support at $1.30, and is only now trying to claw back toward the $1.50 psychological level. In that context, ETH-USD is not rallying in isolation; it is part of a cautious, technically fragile bounce across majors after a washout in leverage and spot.

Short-Term Technical Picture For ETH-USD

On the daily chart, ETH-USD has staged a rebound from the $1,734–$1,800 support band and is holding just above $1,900, with an intraday gain in the 3–4% zone. Structurally, the move is still inside a descending channel, with every spike into resistance met by supply. The local swing high near $2,900 rolled over into a low in the high-$1,700s, and since then candles are compressing sideways rather than trending, a classic equilibrium phase where neither bulls nor bears have fully seized control. Immediate resistance sits in a stacked cluster: the first layer around $1,990–$2,000, the next around $2,050–$2,100, and above that the recent consolidation ceiling near $2,149–$2,150. A clean daily close through that band would open a path toward $2,300 and then into the Fibonacci resistance zone: the 0.236 retracement at ~$2,504 and the 0.382 retracement near $2,981. Those two levels, $2,504 and $2,981, are the technical “wall” that separates a corrective bounce from a full trend reversal, with a break of roughly $3,000 needed to confirm that sellers have lost medium-term control. On the downside, the market is still one failed bounce away from another leg lower. Losing $1,800 on a daily close exposes the lower band of the recent range around $1,747–$1,746, then the deeper support window at $1,669–$1,700. If ETH-USD trades decisively below $1,740 and cannot reclaim it quickly, the next obvious magnet is the $1,600 area flagged by multiple analysts as the risk zone if this rebound turns into a textbook dead-cat bounce. Momentum, however, is not as negative as price. The daily RSI has printed a bullish divergence: while price carved a lower low between November 21 and February 24, the RSI put in a higher low, signaling fading selling pressure even as spot remained depressed. The MACD on daily timeframes is attempting a bullish crossover, and on intraday (4-hour) charts the RSI sits in the low-50s, indicating early buyer engagement rather than exhaustion. The setup is therefore binary: structure still bearish, momentum quietly turning, and price sitting right in the middle of that tension.

Derivatives, Funding And Open Interest Dynamics

The futures and perpetuals market confirms that the violent phase of deleveraging is over, but it does not yet validate a new bull leg. In the late-January to early-February sell-off, open interest in ETH derivatives collapsed from about $15.9 billion to roughly $8.73 billion, erasing around $7.17 billion of leveraged exposure. That is a full-scale leverage flush, consistent with the number of forced liquidations seen into the lows. Since then, open interest has recovered by only about 1%, which means new money is not rushing to rebuild risk at high leverage; the market is staying conservative. The funding rate on perpetual futures sits slightly negative around -0.0033%, so perps trade at a small discount to spot. This is not panic pricing, but it is a sign that the derivatives crowd remains either mildly short or heavily hedged. In parallel, a notable whale has opened an approximately $39.7 million short position in ETH with 15x leverage, with a liquidation level in the area of $3,360. That position is structurally positioned against any immediate return to the $3,000s and underscores that part of the professional money still sees this rebound as vulnerable. Net message from derivatives: the marginal buyer is less leveraged, the marginal speculator is cautious, and the options/futures complex is closer to a stabilization regime than an outright bullish regime.

Whale Accumulation Versus Leverage Flush

While leverage was being blown out, spot whales were doing the opposite of panic-selling. Addresses classified as large holders increased their Ethereum balance from roughly 104.48 million ETH on January 27 to around 113.39 million ETH now, a net addition of 8.91 million ETH. With an estimated average cost near $2,100, that implies roughly $18.7 billion in net accumulation during a period when retail and leveraged traders were forced to the exits. This behavior is critical: it confirms that the heavyweights in the ecosystem used the crash and liquidations as a liquidity event to absorb supply rather than join the stampede. In practice, whale buying into a $7+ billion leverage wipe-out tends to characterize bottom-building zones, not late-cycle tops. It also means that any subsequent rally will be launched from a holder base that is less fragile and more price-insensitive, which reduces the probability of immediate new lows unless macro or regulatory shocks hit the market hard.

Long-Term Holders, Exchange Flows And Weak-Hand Capitulation

The broader holder structure has rotated in a way that lines up with the whale activity. During most of early February, HODLer Net Position Change stayed negative, showing that even long-term wallets were distributing into weakness. That dynamic shifted as the market stabilized: by February 21, long-term holders flipped back into net accumulation, and by February 24 they absorbed 9,454 ETH in a single day. This marks the point where patient capital stopped selling the dip and started buying it. Exchange flows tell the same story from another angle. Exchange net position change remained heavily negative through the crash, meaning more coins were leaving exchanges than entering them. Net outflows peaked at about 227,300 ETH on February 23 and then moderated to roughly 109,631 ETH the next day, but the direction stayed the same: investors preferred custody over liquidity. At the same time, the share of total ETH supply held by short-term addresses (holding <1 week) fell from 3.2% to 2.1%, confirming the exodus of short-term, high-beta participants. What remains is a supply stack dominated by whales, long-term holders, and off-exchange wallets. That configuration is typically associated with reduced immediate selling pressure and a higher threshold for another cascade unless price breaks key technical levels.

Vitalik Buterin’s 17,000 ETH Sales And Signaling Risk

Against this accumulation backdrop sits one visible source of spot supply: Vitalik Buterin’s wallets. On-chain data shows that addresses linked to him reduced their ETH holdings from around 241,000 ETH at the start of February to about 224,000 ETH, implying sales of roughly 17,000 ETH over the month. These transactions were executed via CoW Protocol in smaller, staggered pieces, designed to minimize direct price impact and avoid obvious slippage. Historically, Buterin has sold portions of his holdings for donations, ecosystem grants, or strategic allocations rather than for macro timing reasons, but the optics of tens of millions of dollars of ETH hitting the market during a consolidation phase do matter psychologically. For traders, large founder-linked outflows raise questions about near-term upside, even if the absolute size – 17,000 ETH – is modest compared with whale accumulation of 8.91 million ETH in the same broader window. In other words, the signaling is mildly negative at the margin, but the scale is dwarfed by the structural spot demand from non-founder high-balance addresses.

Network Fundamentals, Staking And Ethereum’s 2026 Roadmap

On-chain fundamentals do not look like a collapsing asset; they look like a mature network in a cyclical drawdown. Ethereum processes over 2 million transactions per day, averaging roughly 23 transactions per second, with more than 400 million unique addresses interacting with the chain. Average gas fees are currently very low, in the $0.10–$0.20 band, and overall throughput is only about 50% utilized, leaving ample capacity headroom. Critically, about one-third of all ETH – roughly 37 million tokens – is staked, locked into validator nodes under Ethereum’s proof-of-stake architecture. That represents tens of billions of dollars committed to network security and yield generation, and it mechanically removes a large chunk of liquidity from free float. This staked base both reduces available supply on exchanges and signals structural conviction from large, long-term holders. On the protocol side, the 2026 roadmap is aggressive. The “Scale, UX, Harden L1” framework prioritizes three fronts: scaling capacity, improving user experience, and hardening the base layer. The upcoming “Glamsterdam” upgrade, penciled in for the first half of 2026, targets parallel transaction execution and much higher gas limits (beyond 100 million gas per block), while pushing forward Proposer/Builder Separation (PBS) and expanding blob capacity following EIP-4844. Parallel work on native account abstraction aims to make smart-contract wallets first-class citizens, improving onboarding and UX, while Harden L1 efforts focus on post-quantum readiness, transaction safety, and censorship resistance. If these upgrades land roughly on schedule and without major execution failures, Ethereum’s capacity to handle hundreds of thousands of transactions per second via rollups and sharding becomes much more than a slide-deck claim; it becomes a live reality. That technical trajectory is central to any medium-term valuation narrative for ETH-USD.

Institutional Flows, ETFs And Regulatory Backdrop

From a flows perspective, Ethereum has now joined Bitcoin in the regulated, listed product arena. US-listed spot Ethereum ETFs went live in mid-2024, with trading beginning in July 2024. Through 2025, these products attracted approximately $9.8 billion in net inflows, and by early 2026 ETF vehicles are estimated to hold around 4.7% of ETH’s market cap. That is no longer a novelty; it is a meaningful structural ownership block. These ETF flows sit on top of staking yields of roughly 3–4% APR, DeFi lending yields, and fee-burn dynamics from EIP-1559, creating a combined environment where ETH supply is continuously locked, staked, burned, or warehoused in institutional wrappers. On the regulatory side, a draft US bill in early 2026 aims to more cleanly classify digital assets under CFTC/SEC oversight, with ETH positioned to be treated more like a commodity than a security. This matters for two reasons: first, it stabilizes the legal footing for spot ETFs and derivative products; second, it encourages larger traditional asset managers, hedge funds, and pension pools to treat ETH as a legitimate, allocatable macro asset rather than a regulatory minefield. The tail risk remains clear – a hostile stance toward staking or self-custody would inject volatility and outflows – but the baseline path in 2026 is more structured and less ambiguous than in earlier cycles.

Competing Narratives: Structural Bottom Or Dead Cat Bounce

Markets are currently split between two narratives for ETH-USD. The bullish camp points to the alignment of whales, long-term holders, and exchange outflows: nearly 9 million ETH accumulated into a $7+ billion leverage flush, long-term holders returning to net buying, short-term holders shrinking from 3.2% to 2.1% of supply, and persistent net withdrawals from exchanges. Add a live roadmap (Glamsterdam, PBS, account abstraction), structurally lower gas, and the ETF/institutional layer with 4.7% of supply parked in listed products, and the argument is straightforward: the market is bleeding out weak hands into stronger ones, and price is lagging fundamentals. The bearish camp focuses on structure and overhead supply. ETH-USD remains below the 50-day SMA around $2,538, trapped inside a descending channel, and repeatedly capped near $2,100. On a higher-timeframe basis, key resistances align at $2,504 (0.236 Fib) and $2,981 (0.382 Fib), a zone that has not yet been retested. Funding remains slightly negative, open interest has not rebuilt meaningfully, and a high-leverage $39.7 million short is actively positioned for further weakness. Add to that the optics of 17,000 ETH sold by Vitalik Buterin in February and the risk that macro risk-off or regulatory headlines hit again, and you have a credible path where this bounce fails and ETH revisits the $1,746–$1,600 corridor. Which side dominates will be decided around a handful of levels. A sustained defense of $1,740–$1,800 followed by daily closes above $1,990, $2,050, and eventually $2,504 would shift the balance firmly toward the “structural bottom” narrative. A failure at $2,000–$2,100 coupled with a break below $1,740 and then $1,700 would confirm that this was a dead-cat bounce, not a base.

ETH-USD Verdict: Cautious Buy While $1,740 Holds, High Risk Of $1,600 If It Breaks

For a medium- to long-horizon investor using ETH-USD as a high-beta macro and infrastructure asset, the current configuration leans toward a cautious Buy, conditional on the $1,740–$1,800 floor holding on closing basis. The combination of $18.7 billion in whale accumulation, renewed long-term holder buying, persistent exchange outflows, one-third of supply (~37 million ETH) staked, and an active ETF/institutional channel with 9.8 billion in net inflows and ~4.7% of supply in funds is not the profile of a network in structural decline. It is the profile of a network in a cyclical drawdown with a stronger underlying holder base than in prior cycles. Tactically, the tape still carries meaningful downside risk. As long as ETH-USD trades below the $2,504–$2,981 resistance band and under the $2,538 50-day SMA, every bounce into the $2,000–$2,300 region is vulnerable to selling, especially while funding remains slightly negative and large leveraged shorts are in place. If $1,740–$1,746 fails cleanly and spot spends time below $1,700, the probability of a slide toward $1,600 rises sharply, and at that point the stance shifts from “cautious Buy on weakness” to short-term bearish until a new base is visible. Summed up: ETH-USD is in a transition band. Above $1,740 with progressive reclaim of $1,990, $2,050, and $2,149, it justifies measured accumulation for investors willing to accept volatility and a multi-quarter horizon. Below $1,740, it stops being a Buy and becomes a high-risk asset with a live air-pocket down to $1,600, where the next serious decision point would emerge.

That's TradingNEWS