Bitcoin ETF Flows Turn Green with $6.84M Influx as BTC-USD Holds the $87K Zone

Bitcoin ETF Flows Flip Green While BTC-USD Trades Near $87,000

BTC-USD Under ETF Support After a Brutal Outflow Stretch

Spot Bitcoin (BTC-USD) ETFs have moved back into positive territory after an aggressive de-risking phase. On 26 January, US spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded around $6.8–$6.9 million in net inflows, ending a 5–7 day sequence of red prints across the complex. The timing is important: it comes directly after a $1.73 billion weekly outflow from crypto ETF products in the week ending 23 January, the largest hit since mid-November 2025.
Over the same period, BTC-USD has slipped from levels above $100,000 to trade around $87,000–$88,000, with downside probes toward $86,500–$87,000 as gold trades above $5,000/oz and silver near $100–$110/oz. Capital is clearly favoring classic hedges, while Bitcoin trades as the highest-beta risk asset on the board.

Flow Math: From Record ETF Inflows to a $1.73B Shakeout

The last two weeks of ETF data show sentiment whiplash, not structural abandonment. In the week of 12–16 January, digital-asset products attracted about $2.17 billion in net inflows, the strongest week since October 2025. Bitcoin products alone took in roughly $1.55 billion.
The following week, 19–23 January, the picture inverted. Crypto ETF products bled $1.73 billion, with US vehicles absorbing nearly $1.8 billion of that damage. Bitcoin products lost about $1.09 billion, Ethereum products shed roughly $630 million, and XRP and multi-asset products also recorded outflows.
Across both weeks, Bitcoin still holds about $460 million net inflows ($1.55B in, $1.09B out). The market did not dump the asset class outright; it repriced risk after the “debasement trade” narrative failed to deliver immediate upside when rate-cut hopes faded and macro stress escalated.

BlackRock IBIT: Core Liquidity Hub for BTC-USD Exposure

The iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (NASDAQ: IBIT) is the structural center of spot Bitcoin ETF liquidity. On 26 January, IBIT printed roughly $15.9 million in net inflows, outpacing the entire complex and driving the aggregate back into the green.
Price-wise, IBIT trades near $49.71, with a daily range of $49.41–$50.32, against a 52-week band of about $42.98–$71.82. Average daily volume sits around 53.5 million shares, and current snapshots show a reported market cap near $170.6 billion. Even allowing for minor data quirks, the scale is obvious: IBIT alone anchors a very large fraction of spot ETF exposure.
Cumulatively, IBIT has taken in around $62.9 billion in net inflows, with total net assets near $68.3 billion. That puts IBIT well over half of total spot Bitcoin ETF assets, given complex-wide net assets of roughly $113.5 billion, equal to about 6.5% of Bitcoin’s market capitalization. For practical purposes, the IBIT tape is now a proxy for institutional BTC-USD demand.

Other Bitcoin ETFs: Rotation Inside the Complex, Not Capitulation

The same session that pushed IBIT higher also showed aggressive rotations between issuers. Grayscale’s Mini Bitcoin Trust (ticker often reported as BTC) added around $7.75 million, and WisdomTree’s BTCW brought in roughly $2.79 million.
On the other side, Bitwise BITB saw $10.97 million in outflows, Fidelity’s FBTC lost about $5.73 million, and ARK & 21Shares’ ARKB recorded outflows of roughly $2.9 million.
This is critical: the flows are not uniformly negative. Investors are migrating between funds based on fees, liquidity, and brand trust, not exiting the structure. BITB still shows about $2.16 billion in cumulative net inflows and $3.4 billion in net assets, while FBTC holds roughly $11.5 billion in net inflows and $17.0 billion in net assets, and ARKB carries around $1.56 billion of cumulative inflows with net assets above $3.2 billion.
The flow pattern looks like portfolio rebalancing across wrappers, not a systemic rejection of BTC-USD.

Weekly Crypto ETF Flows: Bitcoin and Ether Hit, Solana and Others Stand Out

The $1.73 billion weekly outflow was broad but not uniform. Bitcoin products lost $1.09 billion, Ethereum products dropped $630 million, XRP vehicles shed $18.2 million, and multi-asset funds lost about $15.5 million.
Yet Solana ETF products did the opposite. They captured around $17.1 million in inflows in that same “risk-off” week, after taking in about $45.5 million the week before. Across the two-week window, Solana ETFs posted net inflows of roughly $62.6 million. BNB-focused products added about $4.6 million, and Chainlink ETFs brought in roughly $3.8 million, while Sui-linked products lost about $6 million.
On 26 January, the tone started to stabilize. Ether spot ETFs printed roughly $117 million in inflows after four red sessions, led by Fidelity’s FETH with about $137 million of new money, partially offset by a $20 million outflow from another ETH product. Total value traded for Ether ETFs hit about $1.23 billion, with net assets near $17.6 billion.
On the same day, Bitcoin spot ETFs posted the $6.8–$6.9 million net inflow, while XRP ETFs recorded about $7.8 million in inflows and Solana ETFs added roughly $2.5 million, all flowing into Bitwise’s BSOL, lifting Solana ETF net assets towards $1.05 billion. The flows confirm a selective risk-taking pattern, not a complete exit from digital assets.

US vs Asia: ETF Geography and Control of BTC-USD Liquidity

Regionally, the United States is now the dominant driver of Bitcoin ETF flows, liquidity, and price discovery. By late January 2026, US spot Bitcoin ETFs hold about $118–$120 billion in AUM and control more than 611,000 BTC, while Hong Kong’s spot BTC and ETH ETFs sit at a fraction of that scale.
Hong Kong launched Asia’s first spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs in 2024 and grew assets under management to roughly $920 million by Q3 2025. That figure has since moderated toward $340 million in spot BTC ETFs by January 2026. Growth in percentage terms looks impressive, but on an absolute basis Asia is still small.
Regulators in Singapore, Japan, and South Korea remain cautious. Japan’s Financial Services Agency is guiding for spot Bitcoin ETFs no earlier than 2028, with a 2026 legislative phase focused on reclassifying crypto as “specified assets” and tightening custody and investor-protection rules. That delays any serious regional challenge to the US.
Europe and Canada play a secondary but relevant role. During the recent outflow week, Switzerland added about $32.5 million, Germany added $19.1 million, and Canada added $33.5 million into crypto ETFs, while Sweden and the Netherlands saw outflows of $11.1 million and $4.4 million. These inflows did not offset US redemptions, but they show non-US institutions are still buying weakness.
The net result: US spot BTC ETFs dictate global crypto liquidity and sentiment, while Hong Kong and the rest of Asia currently track price more than they drive it.

Macro Headwinds: Gold Above $5,000, Silver Triple Digits, and Risk-Off Flows

The ETF flow data aligns tightly with macro behavior. Over the last stretch, gold has broken above $5,000/oz and silver has moved into the $100–$110/oz band, as central-bank buying and falling real yields fuel classic haven demand.
At the same time, BTC-USD has fallen as much as 35% off its all-time high, dropping below $100,000 and probing sub-$87,000 levels. Weekly outflows of $1.73 billion from crypto products are occurring as markets absorb tariff rhetoric, US fiscal brinkmanship, and renewed nerves over potential US–Japan coordination to steady the yen.
Multiple research desks describe the pressure as macro-led rather than crypto-native. In other words, ETFs are amplifiers, not initiators of the move. Capital rotates into metals and out of high-beta assets when policy uncertainty spikes, and Bitcoin ETFs transmit that decision directly into the spot market via creations and redemptions.

BTC-USD Behaving Like High-Risk Equity, Not “Digital Gold”

Macro analysts who still treat BTC-USD as “digital gold” are misreading the tape. The Market Radar framework, circulated widely in recent weeks, is blunt: gold is the ultimate no-default bond with no coupon, while Bitcoin is the most aggressive risk asset on the curve.
Gold benefits when investors fear inflation, sovereign credibility, or currency debasement and want something that cannot be printed. Bitcoin, by contrast, has repeatedly surged when liquidity is abundant, risk appetite is high, and investors are willing to move far out on the risk curve.
2025 and early 2026 have confirmed this divergence. Central-bank gold buying and falling real yields have sent gold to record highs, while BTC-USD has broken lower from its peak, even as the ETF infrastructure matured. The lag is not a structural failure of Bitcoin; it reflects where it sits in the risk hierarchy.
There is another structural point: equities enjoy huge passive inflows through target-date funds and index products that buy regardless of the macro noise. Bitcoin has no equivalent passive cushion. When liquidity tightens, equities can still hold up on auto-allocation, while Bitcoin, with no built-in passive bid, takes the full hit.

Derivatives and Leverage: Elevated Risk Despite the Pullback

Derivatives data from major venues such as Binance show elevated open interest even after the recent drawdown. Analysts tracking this data describe “balanced selling pressure” at high leverage levels. That combination means the market has not fully flushed leveraged longs or shorts.
High open interest while price compresses below $90,000 implies any macro shock, ETF flow shock, or sudden narrative shift can force a sharp liquidation event. The structure is loaded for volatility. ETF inflow days like 26 January reduce immediate stress but do not change the fact that leverage remains heavy.

BTC-USD Price Structure: Key Levels That Actually Matter

From a price-level perspective, BTC-USD is trading in a compressed but fragile band. Recent sessions show dips toward $86,500–$87,000, with buyers attempting to pull price back into the $89,000–$90,000 zone whenever ETF flows turn mildly positive.
Analysts tracking the broader structure point to support just below $85,000, with a deeper risk zone near $70,000 if macro headwinds intensify and ETF flows revert to heavy outflows.
On the upside, reclaiming and holding $90,000, then $100,000, is essential to shift the narrative away from “distribution under pressure” into “extended consolidation before the next leg higher.” Without sustained ETF demand, bounces into the $89,000–$95,000 region risk being treated as liquidity opportunities for sellers rather than the start of a new leg.

What ETF Flows Really Signal About Institutional Positioning

The combined ETF flow and price data give a clear institutional message. First, big players have not abandoned BTC-USD. Cumulative spot ETF inflows remain deeply positive, and products like IBIT, FBTC, BITB, ARKB, BTC, BTCW, HODL, BTCO, BRRR, EZBC and others still sit on meaningful net inflow stacks.
Second, institutions are selective. IBIT attracts capital even on weak days, while some peers see outflows. That looks like consolidation around the strongest vehicles rather than a run for the exits.
Third, the $1.73 billion outflow week aligned with a rapid collapse in the “debasement trade” narrative. Investors realized that rate cuts would not arrive as fast as hoped, that geopolitical risk was rising, and that Bitcoin was not tracking gold’s breakout. They reacted by cutting exposure.
Finally, the $6.8–$6.9 million net inflow day is small in size but big in signal. It shows that after a violent de-risking move, there is still a bid for regulated BTC-USD exposure, led by IBIT.

Base Case Outlook: Macro-Led Range With ETF-Driven Volatility

Given the current configuration, the base case for BTC-USD is range-bound, macro-led trading with ETF flows acting as volatility accelerators.
As long as gold and silver trade at extreme highs and policy risk remains elevated, Bitcoin will struggle to reclaim the “digital gold” narrative. Instead, it trades as a liquid, levered expression of global risk appetite. In this regime, flows can swing rapidly from multi-billion inflow weeks to multi-billion outflow weeks, with price stuck between deep support near $70,000–$85,000 and resistance in the $95,000–$100,000 zone.
ETF inflow days will keep discouraging a full-scale capitulation, while outflow spikes will cap any short-term rallies.

Bull Scenario: ETF Demand Reaccelerates and Macro Stress Eases

The bullish scenario for BTC-USD and IBIT is straightforward and testable. It requires a string of sustained net inflow days rather than isolated prints of $6–$7 million, alongside relief in macro risk.
If US fiscal headlines stabilize, tariff rhetoric cools, and concerns around yen stability and policy missteps fade, markets can rotate back into high-beta risk. In that environment, spot Bitcoin ETFs become a clean, regulated way for institutions to increase exposure. A return to weekly inflows north of $1–$1.5 billion, combined with strong price responses, would put $100,000+ back on the table and potentially re-anchor the digital-asset complex around Bitcoin again instead of gold and silver.

Bear Scenario: Flow Reversal Deepens and Macro Tightens Further

The bear scenario is equally clear. If macro stress escalates, if rate-cut expectations are repriced lower again, or if renewed geopolitical shocks drive another flight to metals and cash, crypto ETFs can easily see another $1–$2 billion outflow week.
In that case, leveraged positioning plus ETF redemptions can drive BTC-USD through the $85,000 shelf and down toward the $70,000 area flagged by several desks. That would not kill the long-term story, but it would reset positioning and force a deeper de-leveraging washout.

Final View on BTC-USD and IBIT ETF: High-Conviction Hold, Not a Fresh Buy Here

On the numbers provided, BTC-USD and IBIT sit in a transition zone, not at a textbook capitulation low and not at an attractive breakout confirmation. ETF flows are stabilizing but not yet strong, macro is still risk-off biased, and leverage is elevated.
Given that mix, the rational stance is:

BTC-USD: Hold, with high volatility risk.
Existing institutional holders, especially those using IBIT, have no structural reason to abandon exposure while cumulative flows remain positive and US spot ETFs control over 600,000 BTC. At the same time, initiating a large new position at $87,000–$90,000 without clearer confirmation of sustained ETF inflows and macro relief is not justified by the data.
In short, Bitcoin and IBIT remain core long-term assets, but the current configuration argues for defensive risk management and patience, not aggressive fresh buying or panic selling.

That's TradingNEWS