EUR/USD Forecast: Pair Pinned at 1.1715, 1.1665 Support Meets 1.1722 Trigger Ahead of Fed Decision and Iran Talks

EUR/USD Forecast: Pair Pinned at 1.1715, 1.1665 Support Meets 1.1722 Trigger Ahead of Fed Decision and Iran Talks

Euro holds above triple moving average cluster after 1.5% slide from 1.1849 high | That's TradingNEWS

Itai Smidt 4/24/2026 12:09:19 PM
Forex EUR/USD EUR USD

Key Points

  • EUR/USD trades at 1.1715 after 1.5% slide from 1.1849, with 1.1665 support and 1.1722 upside trigger in focus
  • Steepening ECB-Fed rate spread at -1.32% supports euro as German IFO Expectations collapse to 83.3, lowest since 2023
  • Fed decision April 29 and Iran talks in Islamabad set next move toward 1.1890 upside or 1.1510 downside target

The euro-dollar pair is sitting at $1.1715 heading into the New York close, a level that barely begins to capture how loaded this tape really is. The pair has shed roughly 1.5% from the $1.1849 two-month high printed on April 17, carved out a session low at $1.1669 Thursday, and is now parked directly on top of the most contested inflection zone of 2026. The $1.1665-$1.1635 pivotal support band is where the daily 20-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving averages all converge inside a 30-pip window, where the ascending channel from the March 30 swing low still provides structural support, where the 20-over-50 moving average bullish crossover is within days of printing, and where the hourly RSI just flashed a divergence in oversold territory during Thursday's capitulation low. The upside trigger sits at $1.1722. The invalidation level sits at $1.1635. A 90-pip range now has to absorb the single currency's reaction to a stalled U.S.-Iran diplomatic track, a renewed oil spike, the worst German IFO reading since 2023, a Fed decision, a Q1 GDP print, a Manufacturing PMI, and the worst U.S. consumer sentiment reading in the 50-year history of the University of Michigan survey. This is the kind of setup that either delivers a clean reversal toward $1.1790-$1.1890 or a cascade through $1.1575 and $1.1510 toward the structural invalidation level at $1.1445. There is no middle ground, and the next seven sessions will answer the question definitively.

The Dollar Bid Is Not About American Data — It Is Entirely About Iran

The greenback's resilience since Tuesday has nothing to do with a domestic catalyst. There has been no material U.S. release that moved the needle. The dollar index at 98.65 and the 10-year Treasury yield at 4.33% are both where they are because of one specific, non-economic event: Iran refused to send a delegation to Islamabad for the second round of U.S.-Iran peace talks, citing the American naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz as the reason. That single headline has driven the entire move. Profit-taking on the short-dollar positioning that had accumulated into the April 17 $1.1849 high accelerated the flow. What that means in practice is that the dollar strength of the last five sessions is technically vulnerable — it is built on headline risk, not on a fundamental U.S. story — and any credible diplomatic progress in Islamabad can unwind it with the same speed it was put on. The fragile ceasefire architecture is the only thing keeping the broader risk complex from a much harder drawdown. Thursday produced a three-week extension of the Israel-Lebanon ceasefire after the White House meeting, and the U.S.-Iran ceasefire technically remains open-ended with no formal expiration date. But beneath that surface, both sides are rebuilding. The U.S. has moved additional naval and military assets into the Gulf region. Iran refuses to engage diplomatically while the blockade is active. That stalemate freezes the diplomatic channel indefinitely, and it means position risk has to account for the possibility of an overnight headline — a tanker strike, a missile exchange, a breakdown in the Lebanon ceasefire — that can move EUR/USD 80-120 pips before the New York open.

The ECB Is Running a Textbook Mini-Stagflation Problem With a 67% June Probability

The European side is running its own complicated story, and it is structurally different from the American setup. ECB policymakers have continued to strike a hawkish tone in public comments while privately acknowledging that the Iran crisis has made forecasting materially harder. A rate hike at the April meeting is effectively off the table after internal pushback from several Governing Council members. June, however, is still a live meeting, and money markets are pricing a 67% probability on a move. The central bank's dilemma is textbook stagflation in miniature — the Eurozone PMIs released yesterday confirmed the worst of both worlds simultaneously: weaker real economic activity and stronger price pressures. The ECB can only act on the demand side of the economy through its policy lever, which means any aggressive tightening in the current regime risks exacerbating the damage to the real economy. The base-case read across major desks is clean: if the war resolves before the June decision, the ECB will look through the short-term energy shock and hold at neutral at least through the September meeting to accumulate additional data through the summer. If the conflict drags on and supply disruptions persist, recession probabilities start climbing and that progressively turns EUR-negative as growth concerns begin to dominate the inflation story. For the moment, the balance is still tilted constructively for the euro because the ECB is viewed as less dovish than the Fed on a forward-looking basis — but that balance shifts if the Eurozone economy visibly cracks under the energy shock.

The IFO Collapse to 83.3 and the Resilience That Tells You Everything

Germany's April IFO release was genuinely ugly. The IFO Expectations component collapsed to 83.3, the lowest reading since 2023, with Gulf tensions and energy price anxiety doing the direct damage. The IFO Current Assessment index dropped to 85.4 from 86.7 in March. The overall IFO Business Climate sits at 84.4. Any one of these prints in isolation would be market-moving. Taken together, they paint a picture of Europe's industrial anchor economy losing momentum at exactly the wrong moment — with a war-driven energy shock compounding structural weakness in manufacturing, capital investment, and consumer confidence. The remarkable part of the session was how little the euro reacted. EUR/USD dipped briefly on the headline, then rebounded to session highs as North American trade opened. That is the cleanest possible signal that the bad news was already priced into positioning, that the short-euro trade has become crowded, and that fundamental selling has temporarily exhausted itself. Resilience on objectively poor data is exactly what the technical structure is reflecting underneath. The pair is not trading on the IFO print. It is trading on the positioning unwind and the technical inflection at the moving average cluster.

The ECB-Fed Rate Spread Is Steepening and Nobody Is Pricing It

The single most underappreciated variable in the current setup is the Eurozone-U.S. implied interest rate policy curve spread. The monthly implied future policy rate curves for both blocs — calculated using short-term interest rate futures that are highly sensitive to expectations on central bank policy — have been quietly steepening from three months ago. The September 2026 reading on the spread currently stands at -1.32%, versus -1.37% three months back. That 5 basis-point move might look marginal on the surface, but the direction of travel matters more than the absolute level. A steepening spread indicates that the ECB is increasingly being priced as less dovish, or more hawkish, than the Federal Reserve over the medium-term policy horizon. That dynamic is structurally supportive for EUR/USD and explains why the pair has not broken down harder despite objectively weak German data, a firmer dollar, and a safe-haven bid into the greenback. It is also why the short-term technical desks are framing the near-term bias as neutral-to-bullish rather than outright bearish despite the five-session sell-off. Rate differentials are the long-run attractor for currency pairs. This one is pointing higher, and the spot tape is lagging behind what the spread is already signaling.

Technical Architecture — 1.1665 Is the Line That Defines the Cycle

The technical picture is a textbook inflection setup and deserves careful walkthrough. Despite the five-session decline, price action is still trading above the daily 20-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving averages — all three of which are now clustering inside the $1.1665-$1.1640 zone. That convergence is rare and technically meaningful. The 20-day moving average is actively shaping a pending bullish crossover above the 50-day, which is the classic positive continuation signal on the daily chart and typically precedes extended upside when it confirms. The ascending channel from the March 30 low remains intact and has not been breached on a closing basis. The hourly RSI printed a bullish divergence Thursday in oversold territory at the session low near $1.1669 — price put in a lower low but the oscillator put in a higher low, the exact pattern that precedes reversals at tested support. The structural pivot is $1.1665-$1.1635. Above that band, the near-term reversal thesis stays alive. The immediate upside trigger is $1.1722 — a confirmed break and hold there opens the door to intermediate resistances at $1.1790, $1.1835, and $1.1890, the last of which corresponds to a Fibonacci extension target. Scotiabank's desk work flags a minor trend ceiling near $1.1745-$1.1765 and a potential bull wedge formation developing on the intraday frames — a continuation pattern that, if it completes, projects toward the upper resistance zone. Downside invalidation is precise and must be respected: an hourly close below $1.1635 kills the reversal setup, opens the door to $1.1575 and then $1.1510, and flips the near-term bias outright bearish. Below $1.1510, the structural question becomes whether the $1.1445 level holds — the multi-month pivot that defines the entire larger cycle.

Elliott Wave Count — The Path Toward 1.2088-1.2400 If Structure Holds

The longer-cycle structural read meaningfully strengthens the constructive case for anyone with a multi-week horizon. On the weekly timeframe, the pair is developing an ascending wave of larger degree labeled B, with wave (A) of B forming the current leg up. On the daily chart, the third wave 3 of (A) is actively unfolding. Wave i of 3 has completed. The corrective wave ii has closed out. Wave iii of 3 has begun developing. On the H4 timeframe, the first wave of smaller degree (i) of iii is building, with wave iii of (i) already printed and the local correction iv of (i) now approaching completion. That last point is critical — the current pullback from $1.1849 to $1.1669 fits the expected corrective structure almost perfectly, and the reaction at the $1.1665-$1.1635 support zone is the expected inflection where wave v of (i) should begin. If the wave count holds, EUR/USD should continue higher after the current corrective phase wraps, with medium-term targets clustered at $1.2088-$1.2400 — roughly 3-6% upside from current levels over the coming weeks to months. The critical invalidation level for the entire structural count is $1.1445. A break and consolidation below that level flips the wave structure outright bearish and opens the door to $1.1185-$1.1000. Trade management around the count is disciplined: accumulate long positions on corrections above $1.1445 with stops placed below $1.1405, and take profit in the $1.2088-$1.2400 target zone. Flip the stance to short on a confirmed break and close below $1.1445, with stops above $1.1485 and targets at $1.1185-$1.1000.

The 10-Year at 4.33% and the Feedback Loop Trapping the Euro

The dollar story cannot be divorced from the rates complex, and the U.S. 10-year Treasury yield at 4.33% is doing serious structural work. Any sustained yield move above 4.30% historically caps risk assets and currency pairs like EUR/USD that carry sensitivity to the real rate differential. The Dollar Index at 98.65 is softer on today's session but structurally firm across the last ten trading days, supported by the same Iran-driven safe-haven flows that are keeping yields elevated. The feedback loop operates like this: yields stay elevated because the market is pricing sticky inflation from the Iran-driven energy shock, sticky inflation prevents the Fed from pivoting dovish, that keeps the yield curve elevated, which in turn mechanically caps the euro through the rate-differential channel and through dollar strength. Break the loop — either through a peace deal that collapses the oil complex, or through a genuinely dovish Fed on April 29, or through a weaker-than-expected Q1 GDP print on April 30 — and EUR/USD has immediate room to accelerate toward the $1.1790 zone and potentially the $1.1890 Fibonacci extension. Until one of those triggers fires, the pair stays in a defensive holding pattern, grinding sideways inside the range.

Hormuz Is the Transmission Mechanism — 57% Gulf Supply Collapse and 10%+ Oil Rally

The oil complex is the direct mechanism connecting the Middle East story into the euro crosses. Both sides of the conflict have been using force to prevent tankers from transiting the Strait of Hormuz, which has driven oil 10%+ higher this week and reignited safe-haven demand for the dollar. WTI crude is trading around $97.50 per barrel, well off the pre-war $72 baseline. Brent crude touched $107.48 intraday before fading below $105 on reports that Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi would fly to Islamabad for a second round of talks. Goldman Sachs is pegging Persian Gulf crude production at roughly 14.5 million barrels per day below pre-war levels — a 57% collapse from the baseline. The IEA has gone on record warning the global gas market will remain tight for at least two additional years. Available empty tanker capacity in the Gulf has halved since the conflict began. Hapag-Lloyd has moved only a single container ship through Hormuz, with four additional vessels and approximately 100 crew members still trapped in the Gulf. For the euro, which is structurally a major energy importer, this is a compound negative — it hits the currency through the inflation channel (which the ECB is already wrestling with), through the terms-of-trade channel (which is a direct growth drag), and through the risk-off channel (which drives safe-haven flows into the dollar). Any credible progress toward Hormuz reopening is unambiguously EUR/USD-positive. Any renewed escalation is unambiguously negative. The Iranian foreign minister's reported flight to Islamabad is the near-term swing variable and is why today's session saw the pair firm back above $1.1700.

Positioning Layer — The 15% Spec Unwind and the Negative Risk Reversal

Underneath the spot price, positioning data is showing capitulation signals that typically precede reversals. Net speculative long positions on the euro have declined by 15% over the past two weeks according to the most recent Commitments of Traders data. That means large speculators have been actively unwinding bullish positioning into weakness — a classic late-phase selling pattern that tends to exhaust itself into support. Retail positioning is mixed, with approximately 55% of retail traders still holding long positions per IG Client Sentiment data. The divergence between large speculators reducing longs and retail staying stuck long is historically a precursor to sharper directional moves as the positioning imbalance resolves. The options market is flashing its own caution signals. The 25-delta risk reversal for one-month EUR/USD options has turned negative, which means traders are paying a premium for downside protection (put options) over upside (call options). That is a hedging signal as much as a directional one — it reflects demand for tail-risk protection against a further leg lower — but it confirms the market has priced in meaningful geopolitical tail risk around the Iran story. The combination of specs reducing longs, retail stuck long, and options buyers paying up for puts is exactly the kind of stretched positioning picture that tends to reverse when the feared catalyst fails to materialize. That is the asymmetric opportunity the technical setup is capturing.

UMich at 49.8 Is the Worst in 50 Years and the Dollar Barely Flinched

Today's University of Michigan final consumer sentiment index printed at 49.8 versus an expected 48.0. Modestly better than feared, but still the lowest reading in the more than 50-year history of the survey, undercutting the 50.0 low set in June 2022 during the post-pandemic inflation peak. The reading is down 6.6% month-over-month and 4.6% year-over-year. Near-term inflation expectations sit at 4.7%, a materially elevated level that will keep Fed officials paying close attention to second-round effects from the Iran-driven energy shock. Survey director Joanne Hsu attributed the marginal improvement from the April flash reading of 47.6 to the Israel-Lebanon ceasefire announcement and a modest softening at the pump. For EUR/USD, the critical takeaway is that the dollar barely flinched on a historically bad sentiment print. That non-reaction tells you the currency market is not trading on data right now — it is trading on geopolitical headline risk and positioning unwinds. A day where the dollar fails to rally on a marginally better-than-feared reading is actually slightly euro-positive at the margins because it indicates exhausted buying pressure on the greenback.

The Event Risk Map — Fed April 29, GDP April 30, Manufacturing PMI May 1

Event risk across the next week is concentrated and asymmetric. The April 29 Federal Reserve decision is the dominant catalyst. CME fed funds futures have the hold priced at a 99.5% probability in the 3.50%-3.75% target range, which means there is essentially no surprise risk in the rate decision itself. The market reaction will be driven entirely by the statement language, the dot plot revisions, and Chair Powell's press conference. A hawkish hold — emphasis on sticky inflation from the energy shock, delayed cut timing, concerns about Hormuz-driven supply disruption — pushes the 10-year yield through 4.30%, strengthens the dollar, and pressures EUR/USD toward the $1.1635 invalidation level. A dovish shift — any hint of earlier rate cuts than the market currently prices, acknowledgment of softening labor data, dovish language around the sentiment print — compresses real yields, weakens the dollar, and sends the pair ripping through $1.1722 toward the $1.1790-$1.1835 resistance cluster. The April 30 Q1 GDP print and initial jobless claims add a second asymmetric risk layer. Stronger-than-expected growth with rising claims is the worst combination for the euro. Weaker growth with softening labor data is the clean dovish setup that euro bulls are positioned for. The May 1 Manufacturing PMI closes out the sequence and functions as the final confirmation signal. Any one of these prints can individually reset the short-term trajectory. Taken in combination, they can produce a sustained breakout in either direction.

 

The Three Scenario Map — Reversal, Consolidation, or Breakdown

The setup distills into three clean tactical scenarios with defined triggers. Scenario one is the bullish reversal path: $1.1665 holds as support on a closing basis, price clears $1.1722 on confirming volume, and the pair runs toward $1.1790 first, then $1.1835, with a medium-term structural target at $1.2088-$1.2400 if the Elliott Wave count cooperates. The triggers required for this path are a credible Islamabad talks headline confirming diplomatic progress, a dovish Fed decision on April 29, a weaker Q1 GDP print that reinforces the rate-cut narrative, or a meaningful de-escalation at the Strait of Hormuz with tankers resuming transit. Scenario two is the consolidation path, which is arguably the most probable near-term outcome: the pair oscillates inside the $1.1635-$1.1722 range through the early part of next week, implied volatility compresses as traders wait for either the Fed or a decisive geopolitical development, and the setup resolves only after April 29. Scenario three is the bearish breakdown: an hourly close below $1.1635 invalidates the entire reversal thesis, triggers stop-loss cascades through the dense moving average cluster, and opens $1.1575 as the first target and $1.1510 as the secondary. The triggers here are a hawkish Fed, a full collapse of the Islamabad diplomatic window, renewed escalation at Hormuz with fresh tanker attacks, or a hot U.S. inflation component in the GDP release. Below $1.1510, the next technical objective opens toward $1.1445 — the level that would invalidate the entire bullish Elliott Wave structural count and open the door to $1.1185-$1.1000.

Risk Management — Stop Placement, Position Sizing, and the Headline Gap Problem

Position sizing and stop placement require unusual care in the current environment because the geopolitical overlay can produce gap moves that blow through stops without filling at the intended level. Long entries scaled into the $1.1665-$1.1700 zone should use hard stops below $1.1635 rather than inside the moving average cluster, accepting roughly 30-40 pips of risk against first-target upside of $1.1790 (roughly 90 pips) and extended targets at $1.1835-$1.1890 (135-190 pips). That is a favorable risk-reward profile at roughly 1:2.5 to 1:5 depending on the target. For longer-horizon structural long positioning, the Elliott Wave framework supports accumulation on any move above $1.1445 with stops below $1.1405 and targets in the $1.2088-$1.2400 zone. Do not chase strength above $1.1722 without a clean pullback to confirm the breakout — the failure rate on impulsive entries near confirmed trigger levels is high. Respect the $1.1635 invalidation level absolutely — a close below there flips the entire thesis and requires a full exit from long positioning. Keep overnight position sizing conservative because the headline-driven gap risk remains elevated until there is either a concrete diplomatic breakthrough or a formal Fed communication. Avoid holding large positions into the April 29 Fed decision unless the intent is to trade the event itself with strict risk parameters.

Directional Call on EUR/USD — Cautious Buy With Asymmetric Upside

Rating: Cautious Buy. The technical structure favors a reversal from the $1.1665-$1.1635 support cluster. The moving average confluence, the pending 20-over-50 bullish crossover, the hourly RSI bullish divergence, the intact ascending channel from March 30, the steepening ECB-Fed rate spread, and the extended speculative positioning unwind all point in the same direction. Scaling into long exposure in the $1.1665-$1.1700 zone with hard stops below $1.1635 offers favorable risk-reward. The near-term target is $1.1790. Extended targets are $1.1835 and $1.1890. The structural stretch target, if the Elliott Wave count cooperates through the summer, is the $1.2088-$1.2400 zone, corresponding to 3-6% upside from current levels over the coming weeks to months. The discipline that makes this work: do not chase strength above $1.1722 without a clean pullback to confirm the break. Respect the $1.1635 invalidation level absolutely. Keep position sizing conservative because geopolitical headline risk can produce gap moves that blow through stops. The euro is fighting a two-front battle — a dollar safe-haven bid driven by the Middle East flow and a domestic growth problem reflected in the IFO collapse — but the positioning unwind, the rate differential direction, and the technical structure at the moving average convergence all argue the downside is closer to exhausted than to beginning. Trade the range, respect the levels, and let the Fed on April 29 and the Islamabad headlines determine whether this becomes the launch pad for the next leg of the larger bull cycle toward $1.2088-$1.2400 or the staging ground for a deeper corrective phase toward the $1.1445 structural pivot. The asymmetry favors the long side at current levels — roughly 70 pips of defined downside risk against ~175 pips to the first extended target and ~370 pips to the full structural objective. That is the kind of reward-to-risk ratio that rewards patient positioning and strict discipline, and it is the reason the neutral-to-bullish framing currently dominates across the institutional flow desks.

That's TradingNEWS