Natural Gas Prices Forecast - NG=F Explode Above $5 as Henry Hub Cash Hits $18.80

Natural Gas Price Outlook: NG=F Reprices Winter Risk And LNG Wave

Front-month NG=F and Henry Hub cash explode after weeks of complacency

Front-month NG=F has flipped from quiet to extreme in a few sessions. February futures traded near $3.10 per MMBtu at the end of last week and then ripped to around $5.36, with roughly a 62% jump between Tuesday and Thursday alone and a single-day gain close to 25% at one point. The contract settled Thursday near $5.05 and briefly traded around $5.65, marking the largest three-day percentage rally in decades and the strongest weekly gain since records starting in 1990. In the physical market, Henry Hub spot climbed to almost $8.15 per MMBtu on 22 January after rising sharply over the prior week. Cash prices for weekend delivery at Henry Hub blew out to about $18.80 per MMBtu versus roughly $8.42 the previous day, signalling a short-term scramble for molecules rather than a structural shortage. Regional hubs followed: SoCal Citygate traded near $8 per MMBtu versus about $4.42 a day earlier as constrained pipeline flows from West Texas into the West Coast met a weather-driven demand spike. This is the classic Natural Gas pattern: liquidity is deep until weather, storage and positioning line up; then front-end pricing can move “really far, really fast” while the curve tries to catch up.

Arctic outbreak adds a simultaneous demand spike and production loss

The immediate driver is the Arctic outbreak that is now covering most of the United States. Forecasts point to 230 million people affected by a major, long-lasting winter storm bringing heavy snow, ice and single-digit overnight lows into large demand centers. Federal agencies have issued specific alerts flagging “frigid temperatures” for the eastern two-thirds of the country over the weekend. On the supply side, Natural Gas output has already dropped by around 4 billion cubic feet per day compared with early last week as wellhead freeze-offs and pre-emptive shut-ins hit production in key basins. On the demand side, models indicate at least 1 billion cubic feet per day of extra gas burn over the next week, as households increase space heating and power systems lean harder on gas-fired generation. That means NG=F is discounting a double shock: lower supply and higher demand landing at the same time, with the added complication that freezing conditions can also affect gathering systems, processing plants and pipeline throughput. Short-term pricing is correctly reflecting genuine physical stress.

Storage cushion and utility hedging cap the immediate consumer impact

Despite the violent price move, Natural Gas inventories are not in crisis territory. Underground storage in the Lower 48 sits roughly 6% above the previous five-year average in mid-January, giving the system a buffer against a few days of extreme draws. The Weekly Natural Gas Storage Report in the first week of February will show how much gas was actually pulled to cover this cold snap; that number will be critical for determining whether $5–$6 futures are sustainable or simply a weather panic. On the retail side, most utilities do not buy 100% of their winter needs at daily spot prices. They rely on a mix of stored gas, term contracts and financial hedges, so the immediate surge in Henry Hub cash to $18.80 per MMBtu will not instantly show up on household heating bills. For NG=F traders, that matters: the physical system can absorb a short burst of very high marginal prices without triggering instant political intervention, but a second or third similar event later in the season would sharply increase regulatory and public pressure.

2021’s extreme spike still drives political and legal risk around Natural Gas

The current rally is being viewed through the lens of the 2021 winter crisis, when Natural Gas markets produced unprecedented price spikes. During that episode, benchmark prices at Henry Hub jumped from around $3.76 per MMBtu to roughly $23.86 within days. In some intrastate markets, prices went from about $3 per thousand cubic feet to more than $1,200, leaving states like Oklahoma with nearly $5 billion of storm-related gas costs securitized into long-term bonds, and Texas gas customers paying off around $3.4 billion in similar instruments, on top of roughly $2.1 billion in separate power-sector bonds. Estimates suggested that gas sellers in a single state captured on the order of $11 billion in profit over about five days. That history is why attorneys general are openly warning against “profiteering” in the current storm and why consumer advocates are calling for restrictions on LNG exports during extreme weather periods. It is also why intrastate Natural Gas markets, where pipeline owners can also own and trade the gas moving through their systems without robust public price reporting, are under more scrutiny. For NG=F, the implication is that extreme front-end spikes now carry not just market risk but also regulatory headline risk, which can affect how aggressively producers, marketers and speculators position into cold-weather runs.

Global LNG wave: structural headwind for NG=F once weather risk fades

The medium-term backdrop for Natural Gas is dominated by a large LNG expansion cycle that is now hitting the market. Global LNG supply grew by almost 7% in 2025, with roughly three-quarters of that increase concentrated in the second half of the year. North America, and especially the United States, was the main driver, pushing LNG supply growth into double digits in the second half and easing spot prices in Europe and Asia after a tight first half. Investment decisions locked in more than 90 billion cubic metres per year of additional liquefaction capacity in 2025, the second-highest annual figure on record after 2019, with the United States accounting for over 80 billion cubic metres of that new capacity. In 2026, LNG supply is expected to accelerate again by more than 7%, adding around 40 billion cubic metres, with North America providing the vast majority of the increase. On the demand side, global gas consumption growth slowed sharply to below 1% in 2025 after a stronger 2024, as high spot prices and weaker industrial activity cut into usage, particularly in Asia. For 2026, baseline forecasts point to global gas demand growth of nearly 2%, primarily from China and emerging Asian markets. In other words, supply growth is at least matching demand growth and at times exceeding it. Once the current winter premium is gone, that LNG wave is a structural drag on NG=F, making it harder for the front-month contract to justify sustained prices at current extreme levels without either a second major weather shock or a geopolitical rupture.

Interconnected regional hubs and destination-flexible cargoes reshape pricing dynamics

The LNG market is no longer dominated by rigid point-to-point contracts. A growing share of supply is destination-flexible, allowing cargoes to swing between Europe, Asia and Latin America in response to price signals. That evolution has pushed regional price correlations to new highs, turning LNG into a global balancing mechanism. For Natural Gas in North America, this has two opposing effects. On the upside, a structural short in Europe or Asia can pull U.S. LNG exports higher and firm the domestic curve when domestic supply is comfortable. On the downside, as new U.S. export projects ramp and global demand growth slows or pauses, the market can flip into an environment where flexible cargoes chase limited demand, capping how far Henry Hub-linked prices can move above all-in delivered costs. At the same time, the European Union’s commitment to phase out Russian pipeline gas by November 2027 guarantees a long-run role for LNG, much of it tied to U.S. feedgas. The net result for NG=F is that the contract is increasingly a node in a global system rather than a purely domestic weather trade: global oversupply periods will lean on the downside, and global tightness will support the upside, but the growing base of supply argues against a multi-year structurally high price regime unless project delays or policy shocks intervene.

Short-term technical and positioning backdrop after the winter spike

From a price-action perspective, NG=F has just completed a textbook short-squeeze and weather-premium insertion. A market that had seen funds turn increasingly bearish at the end of last week was hit by a sharp, forecast-driven upgrade in heating demand, producing a vertical move in front-month futures and an even more violent adjustment in weekend cash prices. Historically, when Natural Gas posts multi-day rallies of 50%–70% driven almost entirely by weather and short covering, the sustainability of the move depends on two data points: the realized storage withdrawal and the persistence of the cold pattern beyond the first forecast window. If the upcoming storage report shows a large but manageable draw and forecasts normalize, prices above $5 per MMBtu typically attract producer hedging and incremental supply, while the spec short base has already been forced to buy back. In that scenario, NG=F often transitions from vertical to highly volatile sideways trading, then gradually bleeds lower as the risk premium is stripped out. If, instead, a second strong cold shot follows immediately and storage draws materially tighten the balance, the front of the curve can retest or exceed recent highs, but the bar for that outcome rises with every dollar added to the prompt contract.

Natural Gas stance: tactically dangerous long, structurally Sell on strength

Combining the immediate weather shock with the structural LNG expansion and the storage backdrop, the risk-reward profile for NG=F is asymmetric. In the very short term, upside spikes are still possible if the storm proves more destructive than expected, if freeze-offs deepen, or if storage draws exceed current estimates. However, those are low-visibility, high-variance outcomes with poor risk control for new longs at current prices. The base case is that once this Arctic event passes, the market will refocus on inventories sitting 6% above the five-year average and a 2026 supply picture in which global LNG grows by more than 40 billion cubic metres while demand edges up by around 2%. Against that backdrop, sustained Henry Hub futures in the mid-$5s to $6 range require either repeated extreme weather events or a significant new disruption. Without that, the logical medium-term stance is bearish. For a three- to six-month horizon, Natural Gas (NG=F) is a Sell on strength, with rallies into weather-driven extremes better used to reduce exposure or establish hedges rather than to chase upside.

That's TradingNEWS