Natural Gas Price Forecast: NG=F Trades Around $3.10 as Record Supply Threaten The $3.00 Floor
Natural gas hovers near $3.10 as weaker EIA withdrawals, 110.7 Bcf/d U.S. output, LNG export issues and TTF near €32.7 shape the next move for NG=F around the $3.00 pivot | That's TradingNEWS
Natural Gas Price Focus On NG=F Around The $3.00 Line
NG=F Trades Near $3.10–$3.20 As Futures Test A Fragile Floor
Front-month natural gas futures NG=F are sitting just above the psychological $3.00 mark, trading roughly in the $3.10–$3.20 band after a sequence of failed pushes higher and sharp reversals. On the screen, February gas recently hovered close to $3.115 per MMBtu, while U.S. spot benchmarks printed near $3.25, with the spot average lifted by strong Eastern demand ahead of a cold spell even as the futures curve remained cautious. Price tried to extend above roughly $3.38 earlier in the week, but that zone flipped into a hard ceiling, with every test above $3.30 attracting aggressive selling. The message from the tape is clear: short-term traders respect $3.00 as the near-term floor but are not willing to pay much above $3.30 while fundamentals point to oversupply and storage comfort.
Storage Surplus And Sub-Par EIA Draws Undercut The Bullish Case For NG=F
The core bearish driver for natural gas is storage. The latest U.S. inventory data for the week ended January 9 came in with a drawdown in the 70–90 Bcf range, versus a survey consensus around 87–89 Bcf and a five-year average withdrawal of about 146 Bcf for this week of winter. A withdrawal closer to 71 Bcf instead of 146 Bcf widens the surplus versus seasonal norms and confirms that early January heating demand has been too soft to tighten balances. Futures reacted instantly: February NG=F lost ground right after the release, with comments from desk analysts stressing that “healthy storage surpluses” give the market room to discount even the near-term cold snap. The structure here matters. When weekly draws repeatedly undershoot the five-year baseline by 50–70 Bcf, the cushion accumulates quickly and any rally into the mid-$3s looks vulnerable. That is why one short-term note framed the report as “bearish EIA inventory data threatening the $3.00 support,” and why the market is so sensitive to each new print. As long as the trend does not flip toward deeper-than-average withdrawals, storage remains a headwind for sustained upside in NG=F.
Weather: Near-Term Cold Versus Late-January Warmth In U.S. Gas Demand
Weather is pulling natural gas in two directions at once. In the very short term, Arctic air and winter weather advisories in parts of the U.S. are boosting residential and commercial heating demand, especially across the Eastern half of the country. That is visible in the physical market: Eastern cash hubs have been bid up, and the national spot average pushed above $3.20 as buyers locked in supply ahead of the colder Martin Luther King Jr. holiday weekend. However, updated model runs for the last week of January are turning more bearish. New temperature projections show above-normal readings across key load centers in the eastern United States between roughly January 24 and January 28, sharply cutting the expected heating degree days compared with prior forecasts. This shift explains why the futures curve is reluctant to price a big weather premium despite the immediate cold. Traders are effectively saying that a short burst of strong demand now will be offset by milder conditions later in the month. For NG=F, that means bounces on cold headlines are being sold into rather than chased, because the market is already looking through to a warmer late-January profile.
Production, LNG Bottlenecks And The U.S. Supply-Demand Imbalance In Natural Gas
On the supply side, natural gas remains heavily oversupplied by historical standards. U.S. dry gas output is hovering near record territory around 110.7 billion cubic feet per day, while domestic consumption has fallen by roughly 15.5% year-on-year. That combination alone would be enough to pressure prices, but recent disruptions have intensified the imbalance. Technical issues at major LNG export terminals, including Cheniere’s Corpus Christi facility and the Freeport plant, have reduced feedgas flows out of the U.S. Gulf Coast. Gas that would normally be liquefied and shipped to overseas buyers is instead backing up into the domestic network and adding to storage. At the same time, associated gas from oil drilling remains a swing variable. Oil-linked gas output has been driving much of the recent supply growth, and if crude prices stay soft because of easing geopolitical risk or tariff noise, producers may be less aggressive on oil rigs later in 2026, tightening associated gas volumes. For now, though, the balance is straightforward: record-near production, weaker U.S. demand, and temporary LNG bottlenecks collectively reinforce a bearish supply-demand setup for NG=F in the near term.
Global Context: European Benchmarks And Asian LNG Demand Support A Medium-Term Floor
Outside the U.S., the global natural gas landscape looks less comfortable, which is one reason the downside in NG=F has not fully collapsed. European benchmark Dutch TTF has climbed toward about €32.7 per MWh, its highest level since October, as traders price a mix of geopolitical risk, below-average storage levels in parts of the EU, and expectations of stronger LNG competition from Asia. A cold wave projected for northwest China, the Korean Peninsula and Japan is likely to boost heating demand and pull more LNG cargoes eastward. That dynamic tightens the global LNG market and improves the relative value of U.S. export prices versus Henry Hub benchmarks. At the same time, Europe’s reliance on U.S. LNG has deepened as Russian pipeline flows remain structurally lower, while pipeline imports into the continent continued to decline last year. This pull on U.S. molecules means that once technical constraints at Corpus Christi and Freeport are resolved, export demand should again absorb a larger chunk of U.S. production. In other words, the international backdrop is not yet bullish enough to force NG=F decisively higher, but it does argue against a sustained break far below the marginal cost of U.S. supply. It effectively sets a medium-term floor under natural gas once current domestic gluts are worked down.
Read More
-
SPY ETF Price: NYSEARCA:SPY Hovers Near $695 High As $16.1B Exits And Value Rotation Builds
15.01.2026 · TradingNEWS ArchiveStocks
-
XRP ETF Inflows Hit $1.37B As XRP-USD Holds Above $2 And XRPI, XRPR Lock Up Supply
15.01.2026 · TradingNEWS ArchiveCrypto
-
Oil Price Forecast: WTI (CL=F) Tests $59 Support While Brent (BZ=F) Retreats To $63
15.01.2026 · TradingNEWS ArchiveCommodities
-
USD/JPY Price Forecast: Pair Stalls Near 158 As 160 Wall Collides With Intervention Risk
15.01.2026 · TradingNEWS ArchiveForex
Price Action, Channels And Key Levels For Natural Gas Futures NG=F And XNG/USD
Technically, natural gas futures NG=F and the closely watched XNG/USD representation remain in a clear downward structure. Earlier in the winter, the long-term chart showed prices oscillating around the median of a descending channel, with supply and demand roughly balanced near that central band. That balance broke in late December, when a sharp sell-off pushed prices lower, leaving bearish gaps on the chart and confirming that sellers regained control. From there, price action has respected a new downward trajectory, with trendlines drawn from recent highs clearly pointing lower. On the shorter-term 4-hour chart, NG=F has repeatedly failed at roughly $3.38, where a descending trendline and prior resistance converge. Each attempt to reclaim that zone has been rejected, leaving long upper shadows and reinforcing $3.38 as a critical ceiling. Below spot, initial support sits near $3.05, followed by a more important zone around $2.83, which lines up with prior demand and a horizontal base from earlier in the year. Moving averages confirm the bias: both the 50-period and 200-period EMAs are sloping downward, signalling that rallies remain counter-trend. Momentum indicators such as RSI hovering near the low-40s underline weak upside energy without yet hitting extreme oversold territory. A separate longer-term view of XNG/USD highlights that prices are now trading close to the 2025 low set in August, and analysts warn that a clean break below that prior floor could trigger a psychological flush, forced profit-taking by shorts, and then a sharp squeeze higher toward the next resistance band.
Short-Term Trading Dynamics: Inventory Surprises, Widow-Maker Calm And $3.00 Risk
Short-dated natural gas trading is dominated by how the market digests weekly storage surprises and near-term weather. The famous “widow-maker” spread, which measures volatility between March and April contracts, has calmed markedly as worries about an extreme winter shortage have faded. That calm reflects confidence that current storage surpluses give the U.S. system enough buffer to handle even a couple of strong cold blasts without pushing inventories into dangerous territory. However, calm does not mean zero risk. A second consecutive underwhelming EIA withdrawal would further solidify the bearish narrative and invite speculators to test sub-$3.00 levels on NG=F. Conversely, a surprise draw closer to the five-year 146 Bcf yardstick would quickly revive concerns about how fast the surplus can be eroded and could force shorts to cover, especially given how crowded the bearish channel has become. For now, though, the balance of evidence shows option markets and calendar spreads treating $3.00 as the pivot and pricing limited upside unless storage data or weather radically change the calculus.
Medium-Term 2026 View: Associated Gas, LNG Exports And Volatility Risk In Natural Gas
Looking beyond the next few weeks, the 2026 story for natural gas is less one-directional and more about volatility. Associated gas from oil drilling has been a major driver of supply growth, particularly in basins like the Permian where crude economics dictate rig behavior. Recent charts of Waha hub pricing showed frequent dips below zero in 2025, with spikes down towards minus $9.00 per MMBtu during pipeline constraint periods, a clear sign of how oversupplied regional gas can become when midstream capacity lags production. If oil prices stay subdued because tariff risks and geopolitical tensions cap crude rallies, producers may trim oil-weighted activity later this year, cutting associated gas volumes and tightening the overall U.S. balance just as new LNG export capacity ramps. At the same time, Europe is structurally shifting toward more U.S. LNG, and Asian cold snaps will regularly compete for marginal cargoes. That mix points to a second half of 2026 where NG=F could swing sharply as the market toggles between oversupply scenarios and concern over whether upstream and midstream infrastructure can keep pace with export demand. In that environment, tests of $3.00, $2.80 or even the prior 2025 low may be followed by violent short-covering rallies if any single catalyst—an unexpectedly deep storage draw, a pipeline outage, or a cold early-winter pattern—hits a market positioned for endless surplus.
Natural Gas Trading Stance On NG=F – Cautious Hold With A Bearish Short-Term Tilt
Bringing the pieces together, natural gas futures NG=F are being pulled between heavy near-term bearish fundamentals and medium-term structural support from global demand and potential associated-gas risk. Spot and front-month prices around $3.10–$3.20 sit just above a highly visible $3.00 support that is now being tested by weaker-than-normal EIA withdrawals, record-near production around 110.7 Bcf per day, domestic consumption down roughly 15.5% versus last year, and temporary LNG export constraints at major Gulf Coast terminals. Technical signals back that caution, with a clear descending channel, repeated failures at $3.38, downward-sloping 50- and 200-period averages, and momentum indicators nowhere near washed-out extremes. At the same time, European benchmark TTF near €32.7 per MWh, rising Asian LNG demand, and the likelihood that associated gas growth moderates later in 2026 argue against a deep, sustained collapse well below the marginal U.S. cost base. Given this mix, the stance on NG=F is a cautious Hold with a bearish short-term bias. The risk-reward for fresh longs above $3.10 is weak while storage stays comfortably above historical norms and late-January weather tilts warmer, but an outright structural Sell call ignores the embedded optionality if exports normalize and associated gas softens into the back half of 2026. Traders leaning short can continue to use rallies toward the $3.30–$3.40 band as distribution zones, but they should be ready to reduce exposure or even pivot if a combination of deeper-than-expected draws and export recovery flips the narrative from surplus to tightening faster than the curve currently prices.