Oil Price Forecast: WTI at $56 and Brent at $60 as Trump’s Venezuela Blockade Collides With 20% Yearly Slide

WTI CL=F Rebounds to $56–57, But the Tape Still Trades Like a Bear Market

Short-Term Bounce Inside a Bigger Downtrend

West Texas Intermediate CL=F has snapped back into the mid-$56s–$57s after touching a closing low near $55.27, its weakest level since early 2021. Spot quotes around $56.29–$56.69 mean a 1.8%–2.6% daily jump, but this bounce sits inside a much deeper drawdown, with Brent down roughly 20% year-to-date and WTI tracking the same direction. The latest move is a geopolitical volatility spike, not a structural trend reversal. Futures are reacting to a sudden risk premium rather than a tightening inventory backdrop. Even after the rally, WTI trades just above $55, while the Dallas Fed survey cites an average spot of $59.00 during the collection window, showing how fast prices slipped below levels producers had treated as normal only weeks ago and confirming that the gravitational pull this quarter has been lower, not higher.

Brent BZ=F Near $60 as Venezuela Blockade Adds Risk Premium, Not a Super-Spike

North Sea benchmark BZ=F is trading just under $60, with spot levels such as $59.80–$60.33 reflecting roughly a 2.3% intraday rise. Brent’s recovery simply retraces part of Tuesday’s -2.7% slide and leaves the curve anchored in a high-50s to low-60s band. The market is repricing near-term disruption but not embracing a lasting shortage. A “total and complete blockade” of sanctioned Venezuelan tankers on paper threatens several hundred thousand barrels per day, yet Brent’s response peaked at about +2.5% before fading toward +1.5%, which tells you traders view the impact as regionally contained and hedgeable rather than the start of a super-spike.

Venezuela: Blockade, Cyberattack and Naphtha Squeeze Hit 0.6–0.8 Mb/d of Flows

The key catalyst is U.S. President Trump’s directive to block all sanctioned tankers entering or leaving Venezuela. The order targets around 590,000 barrels per day of “shadow fleet” shipments within a broader export profile near 850,000 barrels per day, most of which ultimately lands in Chinese refineries. Operations are already under severe stress. A recent tanker seizure off Venezuela left multiple vessels effectively stranded. A separate cyberattack on PDVSA forced the company to isolate oilfields, refineries and ports from its central systems and to revert to manual, pen-and-paper logs to keep crude exports from freezing entirely. The blending chain is strained as well. The Benin-flagged Boltaris turned away from delivering 32,000 tonnes of Russian naphtha, a critical diluent for Venezuela’s extra-heavy crude, and headed back toward Europe. Discounts on Merey crude delivered to China have blown out to roughly $21 per barrel below Brent, compared with $14–$15 only a week earlier, as shipowners price in war-risk clauses and buyers demand larger concessions to absorb seizure risk. By contrast, Chevron’s OFAC-licensed operations continue to load cargoes to the United States, highlighting the asymmetry: unlicensed flows are being choked, while the licensed channel stays open, which helps explain why the global complex sees this as targeted stress rather than a full-scale supply crisis.

Russian Refineries, Shadow Fleet and EU Energy Divorce Add Layers to the Risk Stack

The Venezuelan story lands on top of an expanding campaign against Russian energy infrastructure. Ukraine’s “Deep Strike” capability has already hit refineries such as Slavyansk-on-Kuban, a plant with capacity around 5.2 million tonnes per year, and other facilities near the Black Sea and Caspian, cutting into Russia’s refining and product export capacity even when upstream crude output stays high. Parallel to that, Washington is preparing a sanctions “nuclear option” aimed at Russia’s shadow tanker fleet and the traders enabling those flows, threatening the workaround that has kept Russian barrels moving despite earlier caps. In Europe, the Parliament has voted 500 to 120 to mandate a complete phase-out of Russian gas imports by late 2027, with the Commission signalling similar oil legislation for early 2026. That combination hard-codes a structural pivot away from Russian molecules. For BZ=F, the result is a risk profile with fat tails: the base case remains soft demand and comfortable supply, but low-probability, high-impact shocks—tighter tanker sanctions, deeper refinery outages or an accelerated EU oil phase-out—can abruptly knock Brent out of the $58–$62 channel into higher territory, and the current curve only partially reflects that tail risk.

Macro and Demand: China Discounts, Weak Data and Peace-Talk Optionality Cap the Upside

Even with supply-side headlines, the dominant constraint on CL=F and BZ=F is demand and inventory comfort. Crude was trading at multi-year lows before the Venezuelan blockade because of several overlapping pressures. Chinese refiners have raised runs despite seasonal maintenance, but they are insisting on steeper discounts and show no urgency to secure marginal barrels, using access to Russian and Iranian supplies to push terms in their favour and forcing Venezuela, for example, into $21/bbl discounts. Hints of progress in Russia-Ukraine talks periodically slice 2–3% off Brent in a single day as traders price the risk that sanctions on Russian exports could ease, reinforcing the oversupply narrative. At the same time, macro data point to a late-cycle slowdown. UK inflation dropped to 3.2% in November from 3.6%, below the 3.5% consensus and cementing expectations of Bank of England rate cuts in 2026. Eurozone inflation sits at 2.1%, just above the European Central Bank’s target, while U.S. unemployment has climbed to 4.6%, a four-year high. That mix implies moderate or slowing fuel demand growth and keeps investors wary of overpaying for barrels, which is why a dramatic blockade headline translates into mid-single-digit percentage moves rather than double-digit spikes.

Energy Equities: BP, SHEL, EQNR, TTE, XOM and CVX Price a Higher Floor, Not a New Super-Cycle

Equity tape confirms that investors see a higher floor for CL=F and BZ=F, not the start of a new super-cycle. In Europe, integrated majors are up solidly in parallel with crude. BP is ahead by roughly 2.7%, Shell gains about 2.0%, Equinor (EQNR) adds close to 1.8%, and TotalEnergies (TTE) advances around 1.6%, helping lift the FTSE 100 by about 1.5%. In the United States, the move is more subdued: Exxon Mobil (XOM) trades roughly 0.98% higher, and Chevron (CVX) lags with an increase near 0.84%, reflecting market caution around Chevron’s specific Venezuelan exposure despite the OFAC license. At the current $56–$60 crude band, these names trade primarily as yield and buyback vehicles, with enough pricing power to sustain dividends and disciplined capital spending but not enough visibility to justify aggressive growth programs that would imply a new structural boom.

Dallas Fed Survey: U.S. Shale Budgets Around $62 WTI in 2026 with Activity Index at -6.2

The latest Dallas Fed Energy Survey provides a quantitative read on how U.S. shale is absorbing CL=F in the mid-50s. The business activity index stands at -6.2, indicating that more firms report contraction than expansion. The company outlook index is -15.2, and the outlook uncertainty index is 43.4, signalling persistent pessimism and volatility. Oil production is essentially flat; the oil production index has improved from -8.6 to -3.4 but remains below zero, while the natural gas production index has moved from -3.2 to 0, a neutral stance. Cost pressure is moderating without turning negative. The oilfield-services input cost index has fallen from 34.8 to 24.4, the finding and development cost index for E&Ps has dropped from 22.0 to 5.7, and lease operating expenses have eased from 36.9 to 28.4, meaning expenses are rising at a slower pace, not falling outright. On labour, the aggregate employment index has weakened from -1.5 to -10.8, and the aggregate hours index from -3.7 to -9.3, even as the wages and benefits index remains positive at 6.2. Forward pricing expectations show where the industry itself anchors fair value. Respondents, on average, expect WTI at $62 per barrel at end-2026 with a range of $50–$82, $69 two years out and $75 five years out. For gas, the same group projects Henry Hub at $4.19/MMBtu at year-end 2026, rising to $4.57 in two years and $5.00 in five years. With spot CL=F in the mid-50s and the survey collection period averaging $59, these forecasts imply roughly 10% upside over the next year and 25%–35% over five years if demand holds and policy does not trigger a structural shift away from crude.

Short-Term Positioning: Sentiment Rally in CL=F and BZ=F Invites Sell-the-Spike Trades

Positioning data and trader commentary show that desks view today’s move as an opportunity, not a regime change. The consensus across flow desks is that the Venezuelan blockade has delivered a sentiment-driven rally that many see as a setup to build short exposure into strength, given Venezuela’s small share of global output and the robustness of non-OPEC and sanctioned alternative flows. Brent remains down about 20% this year, and repeated supply headlines have not produced lasting rallies. The global tanker fleet is tight, but high day-rates and flexible routing for non-sanctioned barrels keep the seaborne system fluid. Chinese buyers can arbitrage between discounted Russian, Iranian and Venezuelan grades, which limits pricing power for any single exporter and helps cap BZ=F. Technically, CL=F faces stacked resistance from the $56–$58 band up into $60–$62, where both producers and speculators are likely to sell into strength. BZ=F shows a similar ceiling around $60–$63. Support zones cluster near $54–$55 for WTI and $57–$58 for Brent, and any combination of progress in Russia-Ukraine talks, weaker macro prints or normalization of Venezuelan flows could drag prices back toward those levels.

Strategic View on Oil: HOLD Stance with Bearish Near-Term Tape and Moderate Long-Term Upside

Putting all the numbers together for CL=F and BZ=F—spot levels, Venezuelan disruption, Russian infrastructure risk, Chinese discount behaviour, equity market reaction and the Dallas Fed forward curve—the profile is balanced rather than skewed. In the next one to three months, the tape is bearish-leaning, with oversupply concerns, weak Chinese data and peace-talk optionality suggesting that rallies toward $60–$62 WTI and $63–$65 Brent are more likely to be sold than chased higher. Over a two- to five-year window, the industry’s own expectations of $62–$75 WTI combined with persistent geopolitical risk in Venezuela, Russia and key sea lanes argue for gradual upside from mid-50s spot levels once the current glut is resolved. On that basis, oil in its current band is best described as a HOLD, with short-term rallies in CL=F and BZ=F offering tactical short opportunities, while deeper pullbacks toward the low-50s would open value for investors with a longer horizon anchored on the sector’s $62–$75 long-run equilibrium.

That's TradingNEWS