XRPI & XRPR: ETF bids stay alive, but XRP-USD still can’t break the $2 ceiling
Where XRPI and XRPR traded today, and what that says about risk appetite
XRPI (NASDAQ:XRPI) closed around $10.97 on Dec 22, 2025, down 0.90% on the day (-$0.10) after a $10.96–$11.28 session range. With a $11.07 prior close, the tape is telling you the same thing spot XRP is telling you: buyers show up, but they are not finishing pushes through resistance. The longer frame is still heavy: 52-week $10.44–$23.53 with average volume 564.32K, meaning current pricing is sitting much closer to the bottom half of the yearly band than the peak.
XRPR printed a $15.58–$15.96 day range with a $15.76 prior close, against a 52-week $14.79–$25.99 range and average volume 39.66K. Relative to its 52-week range, XRPR is also trading far from the highs, which matters because the ETF market is absorbing demand, but not repricing the risk fast enough to force a momentum chase.
The spot anchor: XRP-USD held ~$1.94, but the market keeps selling the $1.98–$2.00 door
Spot XRP-USD was hovering near $1.94 in the early US session, with an intraday band around $1.91–$1.94. The market tone is “stable but capped”: repeated attempts toward $2.00 keep getting offered, and the trade keeps snapping back under the round number. Liquidity is not the issue. Reported 24h volume ~ $2.29B, market cap around $116.95B, and XRP holding #5 by market cap are consistent with a large, liquid asset that is being actively distributed into strength rather than squeezed higher.
Flows are supportive, but the speed is slowing: $82.04M weekly inflow is still positive, just not explosive
The cleanest supportive datapoint in your stack is the ETF tape: reported weekly net inflows of about $82.04M (week ending Dec 19) and a $13.21M daily net inflow print on Dec 19. Cumulative net inflows were cited near $1.07B, with total net assets around $1.21B. The catch is the characterization you included: the most recent weekly pace was described as the weakest since launch. That combination is why XRP-USD can “refuse to break down” while also “refusing to break out.” It’s not a flow problem; it’s a marginal buyer problem. The market is still getting net demand, but not enough to overwhelm supply sitting above $1.98–$2.00.
XRP is outperforming in a risk-off fund week: crypto products -$952M, while XRP-linked demand stayed green
Your broader fund-flow block is blunt: CoinShares-style weekly data cited about $952M of outflows from digital-asset investment products, with the bleeding concentrated in the US (about -$990M) and led by Ethereum ~-$555M and Bitcoin ~-$460M. In the same dataset, XRP-linked products were shown as positive around +$62.9M. That matters for positioning: when the complex is de-risking and XRP is still pulling inflows, that is relative-strength behavior even if spot is stuck under $2. It also frames why XRPI and XRPR are not collapsing toward their 52-week lows despite the broader ETF complex seeing heavy outflows elsewhere.
Why the “XRP ETF bid” looks smaller than Bitcoin’s: structure, issuer mix, and timing are working against the headline numbers
The comparison you pasted is the correct reality check. XRP has a smaller ETF footprint: you cited five XRP-spot ETFs vs 11 BTC-spot ETFs, plus “no top-10 ETF issuer by AUM” in the XRP lineup. That matters because scale issuers pull flows on autopilot. The BTC market has the opposite setup: you cited IBIT dominating with $62.5B of net inflows since launch, FBTC at $12.2B, and GBTC net outflows of $25.1B, leaving the US BTC-spot ETF complex at about $57.4B of net inflows. XRP simply doesn’t have that distribution machine behind it, so its $1.07B cumulative inflow profile is strong for a new product, but not strong enough to force a spot repricing through the $2 ceiling while whales are selling.
The supply side is the real headwind: whales selling, profit compression, and “breakouts” getting sold fast
Your whale block explains the stall better than the ETF block. Large holders were described as sending tokens to exchanges, with the top 1% wallet cohort controlling about 87.6% of supply, slightly down versus earlier in the month. At the same time, only about 52% of XRP supply was in profit. That is the exact setup that creates sticky resistance: underwater holders sell into rallies to reduce pain, while whales feed liquidity into every push toward a widely-watched level like $2.00. You also cited a slip below a 3-day Gaussian Channel, which in that framing historically aligns with regime changes toward sideways-to-bearish trading before recovery attempts stick.
The map traders are actually trading: $1.98–$2.00 above, $1.90 below, and $1.77 as the “don’t lose this” line
The repeating levels in your input are consistent across venues. Resistance starts at $1.9493 (intraday read), then the more important structural band at $1.97–$1.98, and then the psychological choke point at $2.00. Above that, the moving-average stack becomes the next friction: 50-day EMA ~ $2.1343, with higher EMA zones referenced around $2.31 and $2.41, which is why even a clean $2 reclaim can still trade choppy before turning into trend.
Support is defined first at $1.90, then the more serious stress line at $1.85 (recent base you cited), and then the “if this breaks, the narrative flips” support at $1.77. You also included downside waypoints at $1.66, $1.61, and $1.50. The point is not that all those levels will trade; the point is the market has a clear ladder beneath price because participants already lived through the recent drawdown and are pre-positioning exits.
Indicators are mixed for a reason: RSI ~42 says weak demand, MACD buy says the selloff may be tiring
You gave the key contradiction: RSI around 42 (weak-to-neutral momentum) while a MACD buy signal was also referenced. That’s what bottoms often look like before confirmation: a momentum oscillator still depressed, while the trend-change indicator starts improving. It’s also why “bottoming” narratives show up next to “still bearish structure” narratives in the same session.
The “bottoming” case exists, but it has a hard confirmation trigger: reclaiming $1.98 and holding above $2
Your dataset includes a swing-failure-pattern interpretation around $1.80, plus a “fear zone” sentiment read around stabilization in the $1.83–$1.87 area. Those are supportive signs, but they are not catalysts. The market will only reward that setup if it forces the technical reclaim: first $1.98, then $2.00, then a push into the $2.13 zone where the 50-day EMA sits. Without that sequence, the trade remains range-first, trend-second.
Macro is finally helping instead of hurting: Fed cut odds rose, BoJ tone eased carry-trade stress, but politics is still a live wire
You included the two macro pivots that matter. First, March Fed-cut probability rose from 47% (Nov 21) to 56.3% (Dec 19). Second, you cited a dovish BoJ hike and a 1.45% USD/JPY rally on Dec 19, with 10-year JGB yields breaking above 2% for the first time since 2006. The implication is straightforward: less carry-trade panic reduces forced risk deleveraging, which helps keep XRP supported near $1.90–$1.94 even when broader crypto funds are seeing outflows.
The political risk you pasted is equally direct: government shutdown noise and delays tied to US market-structure progress weigh on sentiment, but there was also mention of an early January markup hope. You included a historical reaction function: XRP jumped 14.69% on July 17 when the House passed a Market Structure Bill to the Senate. That is exactly why the market is treating legislative headlines as a latent catalyst while still trading the chart day-to-day.
What the market is paying for: a path to $2.5 and $3.0 exists, but only if the $2 pivot stops rejecting price
Your medium-horizon targets in the input are conditional, not guaranteed, and the conditions are visible on the chart. The bullish roadmap you provided is consistent: first reclaim $2, then attack the $2.13 EMA zone, then open the door toward $2.5 and $3.0. The longer-dated upside you included is also clear: the all-time high near $3.66 is the “cycle-level” reclaim, and beyond that $5 becomes a narrative target. The problem is also in your data: XRP is down roughly 33% in Q4 (with BTC down 22% and SOL down 40%), and it was also described as falling nearly 22% over the past two months. That memory makes sellers aggressive near obvious levels, which is why $2 has become a wall.
Verdict: XRPI and XRPR are a HOLD, with a bullish trigger above $2 and a risk line under $1.77
XRPI (NASDAQ:XRPI) and XRPR get a HOLD rating right now, not because the upside case is weak, but because the market is still trapped in a confirmation regime. The bullish case is real and supported by your numbers: $82.04M weekly inflows, $1.07B cumulative inflows, ~$1.21B AUM, and XRP demand staying positive while the complex saw -$952M outflows. The bearish case is also real and supported by your numbers: whale distribution, only ~52% supply in profit, price below the key EMA stack, and repeated failures at $1.98–$2.00.
The tradeable trigger is simple: a sustained reclaim of $2.00 followed by acceptance above the ~$2.1343 50-day EMA turns this from range-trading into a trend setup and makes $2.5 and $3.0 actionable targets based on your own scenario set. The invalidation is also simple: losing $1.85 weakens the structure, and losing $1.77 turns the tape back toward $1.66, $1.61, and potentially $1.50, which would likely drag XRPI and XRPR deeper into the lower half of their 52-week ranges.
That's TradingNEWS
