Bitcoin ETF Inflows Hint at Stabilizing Demand as BTC-USD Nears $70K and IBIT ETF Firms

Bitcoin ETF inflows: where Bitcoin (BTC-USD) stands after the 45% drawdown

Price reset in BTC-USD is far deeper than the ETF position cut

Bitcoin (BTC-USD) is trading around $69,000–$70,000 after falling from an October peak above $126,000, a drawdown close to 45%. The low under $60,000 last week flushed late momentum, then spot bounced back toward the high-$60Ks. Over the same window, spot ETF holdings slipped from roughly 1.37 million BTC to about 1.29 million BTC, a reduction of around 6–7% in coin terms. Price has reset far more aggressively than ETF positioning, which tells you large regulated holders trimmed, but did not abandon, exposure. The leverage and perpetuals took the real hit; the ETF base stayed comparatively sticky.

US spot Bitcoin ETF flows: from heavy redemptions to back-to-back inflows

After mid-January, US spot Bitcoin ETFs went through almost a full month of net outflows while BTC-USD slid from just under $98,000 toward the $60,000 area. One cluster of sessions captured the mood: a single day of roughly $371–$471 million inflow into US spot products followed by another day with around $145 million of fresh capital, giving more than $500–$600 million of net buying over two sessions. That broke the pattern of one strong day followed by larger redemptions and marked the first clean back-to-back inflow stretch in about a month. Year-to-date, the complex still sits near $1.9 billion in net outflows and about $318 million of net redemptions last week, but the pace has slowed to roughly $187 million of weekly outflow even while price pressure was severe. The shift from “constant bleed” to “mixed but stabilizing” is exactly what you expect when forced sellers are largely done and remaining flows are more discretionary.

Global picture: Bitcoin ETF assets hold up while spot price compresses

Zoom out and the divergence between price and ETF asset bases becomes clearer. Spot BTC-USD is off about 40–45% from the October high, yet aggregate ETF holdings slipped only around 70,000–80,000 BTC, roughly 6–7% of the total coins parked in these vehicles. That means most of the de-risking came via futures, options and outright spot selling outside the ETF channel, while long-only mandates using ETFs have mostly endured the volatility. For a market that has lived through prior cycles where structured products were liquidated aggressively, this is a very different profile: the regulated wrappers absorbed the shock rather than amplifying it.

Australian crypto ETFs: halved inflows, $900m FUM and a clear risk-off pivot

EY’s quarterly work on the Australian market shows how regional behavior diverges. During the December quarter, crypto ETF net inflows in Australia dropped 49%, from roughly $161 million in the prior quarter to about $83 million, as Bitcoin averaged around US$95,818 and finished December near US$87,508. Funds under management in these products fell about 17.2% to roughly $900 million, dragged down by both price and slower new money. The first local iShares Bitcoin ETF only gathered around $6.5 million in assets by the end of the period, while the established VanEck Bitcoin ETF attracted about $10 million of fresh capital, noticeably softer than the $12.9 million it captured the quarter before. That mix tells you the Australian channel is late-cycle: flows are still positive, but risk appetite has shifted from aggressive accumulation to cautious averaging.

IBIT: iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) as the core liquidity hub

In the US, iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) is still the main liquidity node for listed Bitcoin risk. The quote sits near $39.27, down about 2% on the day, with an intraday range of $38.49–$39.70, versus a 52-week band of $35.30–$71.82. That leaves IBIT trading far below its cycle highs, in line with the BTC-USD drawdown, but still comfortably above the lower end of its listing range. AI-driven technical work from institutional signal providers frames near-term sentiment as weak, with short-term support clustered in the $36–$37 area and resistance in the $40–$41 zone. Longer-term levels sit much higher, with key pivots around $57 and $66, which effectively mark the price area IBIT would need to reclaim for the market to treat this pullback as a completed correction rather than an ongoing bear leg. The message is simple: the product remains the dominant gateway, but the tape is still below the levels that would validate a full risk-on stance.

Flow divergence: Bitcoin ETFs stabilize while altcoin products lag

The latest sessions show a clear split between Bitcoin and the rest of the crypto ETF universe. Spot Bitcoin funds in the US drew about $145 million on one day and roughly $371 million on the preceding Friday, while altcoin products only managed modest gains. Ethereum ETFs captured around $57 million and XRP funds took in about $6.3 million, but several non-Bitcoin products globally continue to see either muted interest or net outflows. In Australia, the crypto ETF segment as a whole remains in positive-flow territory, yet the growth rate has slowed sharply and the opportunity set is skewed toward Bitcoin rather than broad alt exposure. That pattern is consistent with a risk regime where institutions are willing to maintain or incrementally add to the most liquid asset, while risk capital for higher-beta tokens remains constrained.

Macro and narrative overlay: why inflows slowed without a real structural break

The drawdown from $126,000 to near $60,000 came without the usual triggers seen in previous deep crypto corrections. There were no major exchange failures on the scale of FTX, no systemic stablecoin collapse, no widespread credit crisis in crypto lending. Instead, the shock has been mostly about valuation compression, ETF profit taking, and macro repricing as real yields stayed elevated. That is why research desks describe the current phase as the “weakest bear case” for Bitcoin seen so far in terms of fundamental damage. ETF redemptions and slower inflows are responding to price and volatility, not to a broken structural story. As soon as back-to-back inflows reappear while price is still down almost half from the peak, you know the capital that wanted out at any cost has largely finished its job.

**Six-to-twelve-month read-through: what ETF flows are signaling for BTC-USD

Current ETF behavior says three things. First, the marginal allocator remains selective and price-sensitive; they will not pay parabolic multiples at $120,000+, but they are willing to re-engage near $70,000 after a 45% discount. Second, the “sticky” long-term capital that entered early in the spot ETF cycle has shown a high pain threshold: a 6–7% reduction in holdings against a near-halving of price is not forced deleveraging, it is disciplined trimming. Third, the regional pattern shows where risk will likely return first. US products like IBIT are already seeing renewed inflows, Europe is generally slower but steady, and Australia is in a mid-cycle cool-down rather than an exit. If spot stabilizes above the recent low and volatility normalizes, the next leg of net inflows will likely come from allocators who sat out the first wave and now want exposure at lower dollar prices.

Positioning call: Bitcoin via ETFs as a cautious buy, not a momentum chase

Taking the flows, price reset and structure together, the stance on Bitcoin through spot ETFs is cautious buy, not aggressive momentum trade and not a structural exit. Price around $69,000–$70,000 embeds a deep discount versus the $126,000 peak, ETF holdings have only been clipped by roughly 6–7%, and capital is starting to come back after the heaviest part of the selling. IBIT around $39 with visible near-term support in the mid-30s and long-term resistance bands in the high-50s and mid-60s offers a defined risk-reward profile: downside if macro shocks push BTC-USD back toward $60,000 or below, upside if flows continue to normalize and the market accepts the current range as a new base. For a portfolio that can tolerate volatility and wants regulated exposure, accumulating on weakness through products like IBIT and the larger US spot ETFs is justified by the numbers; chasing upside on short-term spikes is not.

That's TradingNEWS