Netflix Stock Price Forecast - NFLX at $76: Is the Market Mispricing a 325M-Subscriber Streaming Giant?

Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) – streaming leader marked down to $76 while fundamentals strengthen

Share price, trading range and market mood around Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX)

Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) trades around $76.87, up about 1.3% on the day, with after-hours quotes near $76.97. The stock is sitting just above its 52-week low at $75.23 and far below the $134.12 high, meaning the market has wiped out roughly 40%+ from the peak while the underlying business continues to grow. Market value is about $324–325B, with a trailing P/E near 30.4x and a price-to-book ratio around 12x. The de-rating has been driven by a broad tech selloff, worries about AI rotations, and uncertainty around the proposed Warner Bros. Discovery deal, not by collapsing fundamentals.

Revenue trajectory and regional growth profile

Quarterly revenue reached roughly $12.05–12.1B in Q4 2025, up about 17.6–18% year-on-year and around 4–5% sequentially from roughly $11.5B in Q3. Full-year 2025 revenue was about $45B, growing 16% from the prior year. All regions contributed double-digit growth despite FX drag in EMEA, with North America (UCAN) still the largest revenue contributor and international markets growing faster in percentage terms. Management is guiding for 12–14% top-line growth in 2026, which implies revenue in the low-50s billions if execution stays on track, even before layering in Warner Bros. Discovery.

Margin profile, operating leverage and earnings power

Operating leverage is clearly visible in the recent numbers. In Q4 2025, operating income was roughly $3.0B, up about 30% year-on-year, outpacing revenue growth. Quarterly operating margin sat near 20%, up from roughly 18% a year earlier. For the full year 2025, revenue grew 16%, while operating margin expanded by almost 300 basis points to roughly 29.5%, confirming that incremental revenue is dropping through at attractive margins. Net income for Q4 was about $2.42B, up 29.4% year-on-year, with net margin a bit above 20%. Diluted EPS for the quarter was around $0.56, up just over 31%, and trailing-twelve-month EPS sits near $2.63. Management’s internal roadmap targets operating margins around 31.5% in 2026, even while absorbing integration and content investments, which would push absolute profit power substantially higher than current levels.

Subscribers, engagement and content economics

Netflix now serves more than 325M paid memberships, up roughly 8% from about 300M at the end of 2024. Despite this scale, management estimates a serviceable market of around 750M subscribers, implying that the company is still below 50% penetration of its own addressable base and under 10% of total TV time in most major markets. Viewership data underscores the strength of the content engine. In October 2025, Netflix controlled eight of the ten most-streamed shows in the US, with series such as “Monsters” pulling more than 220M+ views and over 40M viewers. Shows like “Nurse Jackie” displayed extremely high repeat viewing, with roughly 30 views per viewer. Similar patterns show up in the UK, where evergreen titles like “The Big Bang Theory” and “Brooklyn Nine-Nine” deliver 35–45 views per viewer, signaling deep engagement and sticky usage rather than one-off sampling. This engagement supports pricing power, reduces churn and helps amortize content costs across a very large base, improving per-sub economics over time.

Advertising, pricing power and new revenue levers

The advertising tier has shifted from “nice to have” to a real growth driver. Advertising revenue more than doubled in 2025 to above $1.5B and management expects it to roughly double again in 2026 toward about $3B. On current revenue, that would make ads a mid-single-digit percentage of the top line with high incremental margins, and the runway is long as ad penetration and CPMs rise. On pricing, Netflix has already pushed its standard subscription in major markets from about $15.49 to $17.99 per month without triggering mass cancellations. Survey data shows Netflix remains the most widely held streaming service, with around 55% of US respondents holding a subscription and expressing lower willingness to cancel versus peers if prices rise. Combined, this gives the company two powerful levers – ARPU via pricing and ARPU via ads – layered on top of continued subscriber growth.

Balance sheet strength, cash generation and debt capacity

Netflix is now a free-cash-flow machine. Free cash flow in 2025 was around $6.37B, up nearly 30% year-on-year. Cash from operations in Q4 alone was about $2.11B, up 37% year-on-year. Cash and short-term investments at year-end stood near $9.06B, only modestly lower year-on-year despite heavy content and buyback spending. Total assets are around $55.6B against total liabilities of approximately $29.0B, leaving equity at roughly $26.6B. Net debt to EBITDA is low at roughly 0.4x on a standalone basis, meaning Netflix could theoretically retire its debt in under a year of EBITDA if it chose to. Including Warner Bros. Discovery’s roughly $33.5B in debt and $4.3B in cash lifts combined net leverage to about 2.5x EBITDA, still reasonable for a business with Netflix’s cash-flow profile and margin structure. The company has been using free cash flow to retire shares, with stock-based compensation around 3% of FCF, much lower than many tech peers; buybacks are temporarily paused to fund the WBD deal but are expected to resume once leverage normalizes.

Warner Bros. Discovery deal – strategic logic, financial impact and integration risk

The proposed $80B all-cash acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) is the key strategic swing. Strategically, it plugs Netflix’s main historical weakness: limited “legacy IP” compared with Disney and HBO. Warner brings a century of high-value franchises, from DC to HBO’s prestige slate and blockbuster film IP like “Dune”. Owning HBO and its ecosystem gives Netflix a second premium streaming brand and a deep film and series pipeline, which can be bundled, staggered or tiered to optimize ARPU and engagement. Management is targeting about $3B in cost synergies, largely via consolidating overlapping functions, rationalizing production and marketing spend, and integrating technology and back-office infrastructure. They expect the transaction to be EPS-accretive from year two (around 2029) onward. Financially, the price tag pushes net debt to free cash flow to roughly 5x at peak, but plans call for deleveraging back below 3x by 2028 through FCF growth and restrained capital returns. The risk is execution and politics. Regulators are already scrutinizing the deal; US lawmakers on both sides have raised antitrust concerns, and the Department of Justice has begun examining market concentration. If the deal is blocked, Netflix absorbs roughly $6B in one-time break fees and advisory costs but keeps its core organic growth path, which management still believes can drive revenue toward about $80B, operating income near $30B and about 415M subscribers by 2030. If it closes, Netflix will control both Netflix and HBO under one corporate roof, with a materially stronger content moat and more pricing and bundling power.

Competitive landscape versus Disney, Amazon, Apple and YouTube

Competition remains intense. Disney+, Amazon Prime Video, Apple TV+ and regional streamers keep bidding up premium content and chasing the same households. YouTube remains the “king of TV” in total minutes watched and is the main threat to attention and ad budgets. However, Netflix’s current position is structurally different from a few years ago. First, Netflix has already proven it can scale profitability: over the last decade, revenue grew at roughly 21% CAGR, while content spend rose at about 11.5% CAGR, disproving the “treadmill” bear case that it would never generate real margins. Second, Netflix’s subscriber base and engagement metrics are at a scale no traditional studio has matched in streaming. Third, Netflix avoided the legacy cable baggage that weighs on players like Warner and Disney; it can selectively add live events, sports and reality formats without subsidizing a full legacy bundle. The Warner deal, if approved, closes much of the remaining IP gap versus Disney while leaving Netflix structurally more flexible than legacy media. The real strategic risk is not one competitor but the combined effect of YouTube, TikTok, gaming and social platforms diluting time spent on long-form entertainment. For now, viewership data and churn behavior suggest Netflix is still a “must-keep” subscription in most households.

Valuation, scenarios and risk-reward around $76–$80 per share

At roughly $76.87, Netflix trades at about 30.4x trailing earnings and roughly 7x forward sales, a substantial discount to its own five-year average multiples (P/E around 37–40x and higher EV/sales in past periods) despite better margins and a more diversified model. Several independent analyses converge on a fair-value band in the high-90s to low-130s depending on whether the Warner deal closes. In a “no-deal” scenario, using management’s internal goals of around $80B revenue and tripling operating income to about $30B by 2030, plus modest buybacks, a 20% EPS CAGR with a 30x terminal multiple points to a 2030 price near $195; discounted back implies intrinsic value today in the mid-90s. In a “deal-approved” scenario, assuming 25% EPS CAGR and a 33x terminal multiple on higher earnings power and stronger IP, fair value drifts closer to $130 today, implying roughly 60% upside from current levels if execution is solid. The market is clearly applying a regulatory and execution discount and is also pricing in the macro risk that streaming growth slows or that the ad business disappoints. On a basic standalone view, though, a company growing revenue low-teens, expanding margins, and converting billions into free cash each year is not expensive at 30x earnings if management’s long-term growth targets are even approximately correct.

Stance on Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) at current levels

At a share price stuck in the mid-$70s, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) is being treated like a fatigued growth story with outsized deal risk. The fundamental picture shows a scaled, global media and technology platform still growing double-digits, expanding margins, compounding free cash flow, and building a second major growth leg in advertising, with a potential third leg through Warner Bros. Discovery. The key questions are your conviction in management’s long-term targets, your view on the probability of WBD approval and your tolerance for regulatory and integration volatility over the next two to three years. Purely on the numbers and strategic positioning, the stock looks more consistent with a long-term buy-and-hold compounder than a broken story, with valuation now finally back in a range where upside meaningfully outweighs the downside if execution continues on the current trajectory.

That's TradingNEWS