Oil Price Forecast: WTI (CL=F) Rally Toward $66 As Brent (BZ=F) Climbs Toward $70

Oil Price Snapshot: WTI (CL=F) And Brent (BZ=F) At Multi-Month Highs

Spot Levels, Monthly Performance And Complex Signal From The Barrel Curve

WTI (CL=F) trades in the $62.95–$63.43 range, up roughly 0.9–1.7% on the day after pushing through its 200-day EMA and stabilizing above the $63 handle. Brent (BZ=F) changes hands around $68.06–$68.49, adding about 0.7–1.4% and marking the highest levels since late September. On a monthly basis Brent is set for roughly a 12% gain, while WTI is up about 10%, the strongest percentage rise for both benchmarks since July 2023, which confirms a clear short-term bullish trend rather than a random bounce. The broader barrel complex supports this: Murban trades near $67.33 (about +0.94%), Louisiana Light sits around $61.69 (slightly negative), Mars US near $69.79 (down roughly 1.25%), and the OPEC basket prints around $63.50 with only a marginal decline of about 0.30%. Refined products are firm, with gasoline around $1.873 per gallon (about +0.40%), while natural gas trades at $6.759 (down roughly 2.80%) after an extreme cold-weather spike. The pattern is typical of a tightening crude tape: benchmark grades grinding higher, differentials normalizing, products supported, and gas retracing after an overshoot.

WTI (CL=F) Technicals: Above The 200-Day EMA And Leaning Into $64.75–$66.50 Resistance

Price action in WTI (CL=F) has flipped from defensive to constructive. The contract has reclaimed the 200-day EMA and is holding above $63, turning a previous ceiling into short-term support. The next meaningful resistance band sits in the $64.75–$66.49 area, where prior supply, a psychological zone, and recent futures work all converge. A daily close through that band would validate a genuine breakout and open $67+; repeated failures in this range would turn the move into a bull trap with a quick slide back toward $60–$61. Importantly, volume on the push is solid but not euphoric, which matches the tape: the market is re-rating CL=F off depressed levels, not pricing in a full-blown structural shortage. As long as WTI stays above $60–$61, the bias remains upward, and pullbacks toward $62 look more like opportunities than a trend change.

Brent (BZ=F) Technicals: Structurally Stronger, With $70 As The Immediate Trigger Zone

Brent (BZ=F) shows a cleaner bullish structure than WTI. Trading around $68–$68.5, it is already close to the critical $70 trigger. The BZ=F – CL=F spread reflects that the market is embedding more risk on seaborne supply; Brent is more directly exposed to Black Sea logistics, Middle-East shipping lanes and Russian flows than CL=F. A weekly close above $70 would unlock the $72–$73 band as the next resistance zone, while initial support sits around $66 and deeper support in the $63–$64 region. The message from the Brent curve is straightforward: the market is already paying a moderate risk premium, and any additional disruption in Kazakhstan, Russia or the Gulf would be priced into Brent first before WTI.

Dollar, Fed And The Macro Channel Into CL=F And BZ=F

The U.S. dollar index hovers near four-year lows, which matters directly for Oil because WTI (CL=F) at roughly $63 and Brent (BZ=F) at roughly $68+ are both quoted in dollars. When the dollar weakens, crude becomes cheaper in local-currency terms for non-U.S. buyers, mechanically supporting demand and justifying higher nominal prices. That FX tailwind is now tied tightly to the Fed decision: the market fully prices a rate hold, but not the tone of the statement. A more hawkish message, with stronger concern about inflation and less enthusiasm for cuts, would firm the dollar and could quickly pull CL=F back by $2–$3 from current levels. A more dovish tone would validate the risk-on positioning across commodities and make a push toward $66 WTI and $70 Brent far easier. Oil’s short-term macro profile is therefore highly sensitive to the Fed communication rather than the mechanical rate decision itself.

Breakout Risk, Inventories And The BNY Focus On WTI (CL=F)

Macro strategy desks flag “price breakout” potential in WTI (CL=F) because the chart setup coincides with tighter inventory data and geopolitics. Private industry numbers show surprise drawdowns in crude and gasoline stocks, tied to weather-driven production issues and strong product demand during the cold snap. If official weekly data confirm additional draws, the narrative will shift from “supply is abundant” to “the system is tighter than expected” just as CL=F is clearing the 200-day average. At the same time, comments from large banks highlight that U.S. WTI remains near a technical breakout zone, and surprise drawdowns at the crude and gasoline level would validate an upside extension. This is why positioning into the Fed and the inventory print matters more than usual; in a normal week the same data would not carry this much price impact.

U.S. Supply Shock: Gulf Export Freeze, Production Disruptions And Inventory Noise

The winter storm across the United States already shows in physical flows. Exports from the U.S. Gulf Coast briefly dropped to zero on Sunday before resuming on Monday, a hard signal that logistics were fully blocked for a period. Simultaneously, cold weather disrupted U.S. oil and gas production, and total U.S. petroleum inventories posted a sizeable draw when the system was stressed. That combination – halted exports, constrained output, and inventory draws – is a textbook short-term bullish cocktail for WTI (CL=F). The open question is whether this is a one-off weather shock or the start of a pattern of more frequent infrastructure disruptions. The current pricing around $63 suggests the market treats it as a temporary tightening that justifies prices in the low-to-mid $60s, not as a structural event that would justify a return to $80+ without additional catalysts.

Kazakhstan, CPC And The Brent (BZ=F) Risk Premium

Outside the U.S., Kazakhstan has become a key marginal driver for Brent (BZ=F). Production at the giant Tengiz field has been curtailed, with official communication saying output could return to normal “within days”, while market sources warn that ramp-up could take longer. This uncertainty effectively embeds a structural bid into BZ=F because several hundred thousand barrels per day of potential disruption are at stake. The CPC pipeline, which handles around 80% of Kazakhstan’s exports via the Black Sea, has restored full loading capacity after maintenance at a drone-damaged mooring point, which means that the bottleneck is now upstream at Tengiz rather than in export infrastructure. As long as there is doubt about the pace of recovery at the field level, Brent will trade with a premium to CL=F, and pullbacks toward $66 in BZ=F should attract dip-buyers.

OPEC+, Russia, Venezuela And The Shape Of The Global Supply Side

On the broader supply front, OPEC+ is preparing to maintain its pause on output increases for March, essentially rolling current cuts and allowing WTI (CL=F) to reprice higher and Brent (BZ=F) to grind toward $70 without cartel resistance. Russian flows remain constrained by sanctions, shadow-fleet logistics and shifting demand, particularly as India has pulled back on some purchases, forcing Russia to provide deeper discounts and reroute barrels. Those barrels still reach the market but with delays and higher costs, which effectively tightens available supply of benchmark grades and keeps the pricing power with Brent and WTI. On Venezuela, policy is two-way: U.S. authorities are working on a general licence that could lift some energy sanctions and unlock more Venezuelan supply, which would be bearish if fully executed; at the same time, pointed warnings from senior U.S. officials keep the risk of renewed restrictions alive. The crude curve is therefore balancing incremental potential supply from Caracas against ongoing friction in Russian exports and the OPEC+ cap, which explains why prices have moved sharply higher but have not broken into panic territory.

Gas, LNG And The Medium-Term Demand Pressure On Oil

Natural gas at $6.759 after a violent rally and partial retracement sends two signals. First, storage draws in the U.S. have been heavy, and NG briefly reclaimed the $6 handle for the first time since 2022 during the cold snap. Second, at these levels gas remains expensive enough to support LNG project economics but not yet at the kind of extremes that force massive oil-for-gas substitution in power and industry. In parallel, the Greater Sunrise offshore gas project, with a proposed greenfield 5 million tonne per year LNG facility in Timor-Leste plus domestic gas supply and a helium extraction plant, illustrates the medium-term competition oil faces from new LNG streams. Australia’s commitment to transfer at least one-third of its revenue from Greater Sunrise to Timor-Leste via an infrastructure fund underlines the political will to bring the project to market. This does not change the 2026 balance for CL=F and BZ=F, but it is one reason why the market hesitates to price a lasting Brent regime above $80: every large LNG project at the margin erodes oil’s share of the future energy mix.

Geopolitics: Iran, U.S. Naval Presence And Embedded Risk In Brent (BZ=F)

Geopolitical risk is again being priced directly into Brent (BZ=F). A U.S. aircraft carrier group has arrived in the Middle East, explicitly increasing Washington’s ability to take military action against Iran, a major OPEC producer. Public messaging warns that further escalation from Tehran could trigger a harsher response, and that possibility is enough to inject a multi-dollar risk premium into seaborne crude benchmarks. At $68–$70 Brent and $63–$66 WTI, part of the price is clearly a hedge against potential disruption in flows through the Gulf and adjacent sea lanes rather than a pure reflection of current barrels on the water. In parallel, sanctions on Russia, discussions involving Russia, Ukraine and the United States, and the continued use of a “shadow fleet” to ship Russian crude all add complexity and latency to the supply chain, again supporting higher prices for benchmark grades that are easier to source and hedge.

Positioning, Inventories And How Much Bullishness Is Already Priced In

With WTI (CL=F) near $63+ and Brent (BZ=F) testing $68.5, speculators have already rebuilt length, and both contracts are on course for their best monthly gains since July 2023. That means a substantial portion of the bullish story – weather-driven U.S. supply losses, Kazakh outages, dollar weakness and OPEC+ discipline – is already reflected in price. From this point forward, sustained upside requires new catalysts: deeper or longer-lasting disruptions at Tengiz or in U.S. production, a further leg down in the dollar, or a meaningful escalation in geopolitical risk around Iran or maritime chokepoints. On the fundamental side, the next EIA data will be crucial. Market surveys expect crude and gasoline stock builds and distillate draws after the storm. If reported builds are larger than expected, the narrative will pivot back toward “weather noise” rather than “structural tightening”, and CL=F could be pushed back below $62 quickly. To hold WTI above $63 and Brent near $70 through February, traders will want to see inventory trends flatten or decline over several weeks rather than a single weather-distorted print.

Trade Stance On WTI (CL=F): Tactical Buy With $60–$62 As Accumulation Zone And $66–$67 As Target

Given the current configuration, WTI (CL=F) has moved into a zone where a tactical bullish stance is justified. The break above the 200-day EMA, stabilization over $63, and convergence of supply disruptions, weak dollar and OPEC+ discipline all support an upside skew. A rational positioning approach treats the $60–$62 band as an accumulation area for short-term longs, with $64.75–$66.49 as the first major resistance cluster and $66–$67 as a realistic objective if the Fed does not deliver a hawkish surprise and inventory data do not contradict the tightening story. Risk should be clearly defined; a sustained break back below $60 would invalidates the bullish setup and shift the bias back to neutral. Based on the current data, the directional call on WTI (CL=F) is Buy, but explicitly as a short-term, event-driven position rather than a passive long-term hold.

Trade Stance On Brent (BZ=F): Buy With Tight Risk Above $66, Aiming For $70–$72 On Geopolitical And Supply Premium

For Brent (BZ=F) the structure is slightly more extended but still constructive. The market already prices a moderate geopolitical and supply premium from Kazakhstan, Russia and the Middle East, and the tape is pushing into the $70 trigger area. A disciplined view keeps a Buy bias as long as Brent holds $66 on a closing basis, with $70–$72 as the first upside band where exposure should be actively reduced unless new disruptions justify a larger premium. Given current levels and the balance of risks, BZ=F is also a Buy, but with tighter stops than CL=F because more of the risk story is already embedded in the price. In short, with WTI (CL=F) in the low $60s and Brent (BZ=F) just below $70, the data support a bullish short-term view on Oil, conditioned on Fed tone, inventory confirmation and the path of geopolitical headlines.

That's TradingNEWS