Solana ($74.05) Sits 75% Below Its $294.33 Record While Spot ETFs Post Inflows in Every July Session
Solana has printed nine consecutive red months yet its exchange-traded funds took in money every single US trading day in July | That's TradingNEWS
Key Points
- SOL trades near $74.05 with a $43 billion market cap, about 75% below the January 19, 2025 record of $294.33.
- The token is down 40.68% year to date and 59.69% over twelve months, with nine consecutive red months.
- US spot Solana ETFs posted net inflows in every July trading session; the latest week added $7.20 million.
Solana trades around $74.05, giving it a market capitalisation near $43.0 billion and a rank as the seventh-largest digital asset. Against a record of $294.33 set on January 19, 2025, the token sits roughly 75% lower. It is down 40.68% year to date and 59.69% over the past twelve months. Over five years it remains up 135.77%.
The most striking figure is the consistency of the decline. SOL has printed nine consecutive red months since that January 2025 peak — a streak that would be remarkable in any asset class and is particularly punishing in one where holders are conditioned to expect sharp recoveries. Total supply stands at 631,249,071 tokens.
The collapse was not Solana-specific and that context matters for the forecast. Bitcoin fell to roughly $62,500 by late June, approximately half its October 2025 high, and trades near $64,500 today. Ether is down 61% from its own peak at $1,920. XRP sits 71% below its cycle high at $1.07. Solana fell further than any of them because its beta is higher — it is the cleanest expression of crypto risk appetite in either direction, outperforming when liquidity returns and underperforming when it leaves. Neither is a judgment on the network.
Sentiment reflects the damage. The Fear and Greed reading for Solana sits between 26 and 33 depending on the measure, firmly in fear territory, with 14 green days out of the past 30 and volatility running near 5.08%. Prediction markets have priced only a 9.5% chance of SOL reaching $90 by the end of July, with overall positioning described as bearish, though the same markets assign a 68% probability to $90 by the end of 2026.
What makes this asset genuinely interesting at this level is that the price data and the flow data are telling completely different stories. Every single US trading session in July closed with net inflows into spot Solana exchange-traded funds — while Bitcoin funds bled $527 million in one comparable week and roughly $4.4 billion left the broader crypto ETF complex across thirteen sessions. On July 28 the largest US wirehouse launched its own Solana product at a fee that undercuts the entire market.
That divergence between a token in a nine-month decline and an institutional wrapper attracting steady, uninterrupted demand is the central tension in this forecast. It is not resolvable from the chart alone.
The July Range: $67 to $80, and the $75 Break That Flipped It
July began with SOL near $67, and the recovery from there was real but capped. The token climbed more than 15% in a week and met selling pressure near $80, where traders defended resistance during the broader market weakness. From the June bottom, SOL gained roughly 30% to trade close to $77.97 by mid-month. The daily chart has boxed the token between roughly $63 and $80 since early June.
The structural break came on July 27. SOL rejected the $77 to $78 resistance area and then broke below $75 — a level that had been acting as major short-term support. That failure triggered stop losses and long liquidations, adding sell-side pressure and flipping $75 from support into resistance. The token fell 2.29% over the following 24 hours to $74.11 and has since been testing the next support band around $73.
The Monday before that break was more constructive. SOL hovered above $75 testing its 50-day exponential average at $76.54, following a 3% surge the previous session. That test failed, and the sequence of failures at the same zone — $77 to $80, repeatedly, since early June — is what defines the current structure.
The near-term reclaim levels are precise. Technical desks have flagged the $74.62 area, corresponding to the 50% Fibonacci retracement, through $75 as the zone buyers need to recover to signal strength. Failure to hold there opens a test of the $72.38 swing low. Beneath that, $68 marks the late-June support zone and $67 is the July open.
Longer perspective on the failed rally is useful. A three-day chart produced the first SuperTrend buy signal since October 10 during the mid-July advance, with the average true range trailing stop moving below price and marking a shift from the prior bearish configuration. The previous sell signal on that framework preceded a 74% decline, which is why the crossover attracted attention. That signal has not yet been invalidated by the drop below $75, but it has been meaningfully weakened.
The honest read is that Solana produced a genuine 30% recovery off the June low, ran into a resistance band it has failed at four times, and has broken back into the lower half of its two-month range. Nothing about that requires a bearish thesis. It requires a catalyst, and the chart does not supply one.
The Moving Average Stack: $81 Ceiling, $94 the Line That Matters
The exponential moving average configuration is the clearest expression of why this market cannot get out of its own way. The 20-day sits near $76.85, the 50-day near $76.54 to $76.79, the 100-day at approximately $80.99 to $81.59, and the 200-day between $94.82 and $97.17. Every one of them sits above spot. That stacking of averages above the market is the textbook signature of a longer-term downtrend that has not turned.
The hierarchy of what needs to happen is therefore unusually well defined. Reclaiming $75 to $77 puts SOL back above the 20-day and 50-day and neutralises the short-term structure. Clearing $81 — the 100-day — would be the first genuine medium-term improvement, and analysts have consistently identified that level as the trigger that could push the token toward $95. The 200-day near $95 remains the major long-term resistance and the level at which a trend change could be declared rather than hoped for.
Momentum readings are neutral rather than oversold, which is the awkward part. The 14-day relative strength index has been reading between 52.83 and 61.21 depending on the timeframe, with the lower reading sitting below its own moving average at 57.24. That indicates momentum with a slight positive bias and no strong directional conviction. Critically, it also means SOL is not washed out. The June low produced genuinely stretched readings; the current consolidation has not.
A rising wedge has formed on the lower timeframes since the June low, with price making higher lows while staying capped under the $77 to $80 band. Rising wedges typically resolve downward, and the July 27 break through $75 is consistent with that resolution beginning.
The upside case has a named trigger that circulated widely through July. One prominent analyst identified $77 as the level to flip into support, arguing that doing so could open a path toward $125 to $130. A longer-timeframe view flagged the current zone as a support area that has held multiple times, with $233.80 as a target on a reclaim and $450 beyond that — explicitly multi-month projections rather than 2026 forecasts.
The disciplined framework: nothing above $75 is actionable without volume, $81 is the first real signal, $95 is the trend change, and losing $72.38 opens $67.
Every Single Session: The Flow Data Contradicting the Chart
The single most anomalous fact in crypto markets this month is that US spot Solana exchange-traded funds recorded net inflows in every trading session of July. Not most sessions. Every one.
The context makes it remarkable rather than merely positive. Bitcoin spot funds registered $527 million in net outflows over one comparable week, extending an eight-week outflow stretch, and finished July with $205 million of net inflows — the weakest month since those products launched. Ether funds had only just broken their own eight-week outflow streak in early July before recovering to $342.9 million for the month. Across the entire crypto exchange-traded complex — Bitcoin, Ether, Solana and XRP combined — roughly $4.4 billion left over a recent thirteen-session stretch. Solana went positive every day.
The magnitudes are modest and that needs stating plainly. Roughly $5.75 million entered during the first full week of July. The most recent full week brought $7.20 million, marking a fourth consecutive week of inflows. Both figures are subdued against the more than $20 million in weekly inflows the category saw earlier in the year. Cumulative net inflows since the products launched on October 28, 2025 have surpassed $1 billion.
Consistency at low magnitude is a different signal from magnitude alone, and it is arguably the more valuable one. Large lumpy inflows indicate tactical allocation. Small daily inflows without a single negative session indicate systematic buying — model portfolios, advisory allocations, rebalancing programmes — that arrives regardless of price action. That is the demand profile institutions produce when a product has been approved onto a platform, and it does not respond to a 2.29% down day.
The comparison with XRP is instructive on the same point. XRP funds took in $12.3 million across July, their weakest month since April, with several days of flat zero and one session of $7.29 million in outflows. Solana's aggregate is comparable in size and completely different in shape.
The caveat that keeps this honest: total net assets across the eight listed Solana funds stand at $889.3 million. Against a $43 billion market capitalisation, that is roughly 2% of the token's value held in regulated wrappers. The bid is real, consistent and small.
MSOL at Fourteen Basis Points and Sixteen Thousand Advisors
On July 28, Morgan Stanley Investment Management launched the Morgan Stanley Solana Trust on NYSE Arca alongside an ether equivalent, just months after introducing its spot bitcoin fund. The products track CoinDesk benchmark rates for their respective assets and charge a market-leading 0.14% annual sponsor fee — among the cheapest crypto exchange-traded products in the United States and a level that undercuts many earlier entrants.
The fee is the smaller part of the story. The distribution is the larger one. Morgan Stanley operates approximately 16,000 financial advisors and controls the E*TRADE retail platform, which in partnership with a settlement provider has already launched spot crypto trading for eligible retail clients across bitcoin, ether and solana. That combination gives the new products a distribution advantage no prior Solana issuer has enjoyed, and it is the first Solana exchange-traded product from a major US bank.
The structural feature that distinguishes it is staking. The trust may stake up to 100% of its SOL holdings, with 95% of the resulting rewards passed to shareholders. Custody is handled by Bank of New York Mellon and Coinbase Custody, with staking executed through named institutional providers including Figment, Galaxy and Coinbase Canada. That is a fully institutional operational stack, and it converts a non-yielding price bet into a yield-bearing position accessible inside an ordinary brokerage or retirement account.
The rest of the category is professionalising in parallel and largely unnoticed. One issuer filed to shift its Solana fund from one reference rate provider to a major global index maintained by an established index house, effective August 24. That sounds like housekeeping and it is not: the reference rate determines how a fund prices in volatile or illiquid conditions, and moving to an index from a recognised global provider is precisely the change that allows consultants and platform gatekeepers to approve a product for institutional use.
The honest framing is that Solana's institutional infrastructure is being built out to a standard the token's price does not currently reflect. Pricing governance, fee compression, custody arrangements and authorised participant agreements are being assembled with the same care applied to established asset classes. Whether that plumbing attracts capital is the open question. Its existence is not in doubt, and its success will be an early test of institutional demand for Solana-specific products in a weak market.
Five to Seven Percent Yield Is the Structural Argument
The reason the wrapper matters more for Solana than for Bitcoin is yield. Solana's staking ecosystem produces returns in the range of 5% to 7%, and the new generation of products passes the great majority of that through to holders.
The competitive implication against Bitcoin products is direct. A Bitcoin exchange-traded fund holds a non-yielding asset and charges a fee, meaning the holder's return is price appreciation minus expenses. A staked Solana product holding the same dollar exposure earns 5% to 7% before fees, of which 95% reaches the shareholder in the Morgan Stanley structure. Against a 0.14% expense ratio, the net carry is materially positive.
That changes the allocator's calculus in a way that is easy to underweight. An institution required to justify a non-yielding holding in a portfolio has to argue for price appreciation alone. An institution holding a position that generates 5% while it waits has a fundamentally different conversation with its investment committee, and it has a reason to accumulate on weakness rather than sell it. Over time that builds an investor base structurally less sensitive to short-term price action, because the buyer is being paid to be patient.
The same dynamic is visible in Ethereum, where staking hit a record 40.2 million tokens representing roughly 33% of supply and where fund flows have inverted against Bitcoin for three consecutive weeks. The yield-bearing crypto assets are winning the institutional flow competition against the non-yielding one, and July's data shows it across both.
Solana's version has an additional wrinkle. Its staking yield is higher than Ethereum's, which reflects both a higher inflation schedule and genuine network transaction demand. Higher nominal yield partly compensates for a higher-risk asset, but it also means part of the return is dilution rather than economic income — an important distinction that most product marketing elides.
The practical read for the forecast: the yield wrapper is the strongest structural argument for owning SOL through a regulated product rather than the token, and it is the most plausible mechanism by which institutional flows could grow from $889 million toward something that matters against a $43 billion market capitalisation. It has not happened yet. The infrastructure to allow it went live this week.
Read More
-
QQQ ETF ($680) Snaps 6 Red Sessions After Closing at $661.73, With AAPL and AMZN Reporting Tonight
30.07.2026 · TradingNEWS ArchiveStocks
-
XRP ETF Inflows — 7 US Funds Cross $1.50B Cumulative While Holding 978.9M Tokens Worth Just $988.7M
30.07.2026 · TradingNEWS ArchiveCrypto
-
NG Front Month ($2.766) Recovers From $2.682 After a Smaller-Than-Expected 28 Bcf Injection
30.07.2026 · TradingNEWS ArchiveCommodities
-
Yen (161.06) Surges as Japan Appears to Intervene, Sending EUR/JPY Down 400 Pips Hours Before the BOJ's 1.00% Decision
30.07.2026 · TradingNEWS ArchiveForex
Firedancer: 207 Validators and a Million Transactions Per Second
The technical case for Solana rests on two upgrades, and the first is now shipping. Firedancer, the independent validator client built by a quantitative trading firm, has 207 validators live and targets throughput above one million transactions per second. Stress-testing reports have indicated it already demonstrated throughput exceeding that threshold under test conditions. Frankendancer, the hybrid version combining components of both clients, accounts for roughly 26% of total staked SOL.
The problem it solves is not speed. Solana was already among the fastest chains in production. The problem is client diversity — the network historically depended almost entirely on a single validator client, which meant a bug in that codebase was a single point of failure for the entire chain. Solana's outage history through 2021 and 2022 was the direct consequence, and it is the specific objection institutional risk committees have raised for years.
An independent client written from scratch in a different codebase removes that objection. If one client fails, validators running the other continue producing blocks. That is the same architecture that makes Ethereum resilient and it is the prerequisite for any serious financial application settling on the chain.
The institutional read has shifted accordingly. Investors increasingly view the Firedancer rollout as evidence that Solana is evolving from a retail-driven trading ecosystem into enterprise-grade infrastructure capable of supporting real-world financial applications. That reframing is worth more to the long-term thesis than any throughput number, because throughput was never the constraint on institutional adoption. Reliability was.
The caveat is adoption pace. Frankendancer at 26% of staked SOL means roughly three-quarters of the network still runs the legacy client. Full Firedancer deployment across a majority of stake is the milestone that genuinely eliminates the single-point-of-failure risk, and that remains ahead. Validator operators move slowly and conservatively, which is appropriate and which means this is a multi-quarter process.
For price, Firedancer is a foundation rather than a catalyst. It removes a reason not to own SOL. It does not by itself create a reason to buy it, which is why the token has fallen through the entire rollout period. The value shows up when applications that could not previously commit to the chain start doing so, and that lags by quarters.
Alpenglow: From 12.8 Seconds to 150 Milliseconds
The second upgrade is the one with genuine catalyst potential. Alpenglow is a complete consensus overhaul — the largest technical change in Solana's history — targeting transaction finality of approximately 150 milliseconds, down from the current 12.8 seconds. It went live on a test cluster on May 11, 2026, and the co-founder has signalled a third-quarter 2026 mainnet activation timeline.
The number that matters is the comparison. Traditional card payment networks process transactions in roughly 200 milliseconds. Solana at 150 milliseconds of finality would be settling on-chain faster than the incumbent payment rails settle authorisations — not faster in throughput, which was never in doubt, but faster in irreversible settlement. That is a different competitive position entirely, and it is the one that makes point-of-sale, high-frequency trading and real-time settlement applications viable on a public blockchain.
Predictability is the underappreciated half. Institutional adoption requires knowing when a transaction is final, not merely that it will be. A 12.8-second finality window with variance is unworkable for applications that need deterministic settlement. Sub-second finality with tight variance is the prerequisite for the tokenised-asset and payment use cases that Solana's ecosystem has been building toward.
Together, Alpenglow and Firedancer address the two structural weaknesses that have kept serious capital away: predictability and client diversity. That is why one research house dubbed 2026 the year of Solana and why the catalyst stack is widely described as the densest among major layer-one chains.
Execution risk is genuine and the timeline is the specific concern. A consensus change of this magnitude has never been deployed on a live network carrying $43 billion of value and billions in daily settlement volume. Test cluster success in May is necessary and not sufficient. Analysts have suggested SOL could test $100 to $110 if Alpenglow activates smoothly and ETF inflows continue through late 2026 — a target that explicitly conditions on flawless deployment.
The forecast implication is that the third quarter contains the single largest identifiable Solana-specific catalyst of the year, and it is binary. A clean activation is worth a re-rating. A delay, or a mainnet incident during rollout, would be considerably worse for sentiment than the price weakness of the past nine months.
The Network Is Growing and the Token Is Not
The disconnect between fundamentals and price is the recurring theme across this entire asset class in 2026, and Solana is its sharpest example. Monthly SPL token holder addresses climbed to a record 167 million. Tokenised real-world assets on the network exceed $2.5 billion. Daily active addresses have held above three million. Decentralised exchange volume ran near $1.55 billion daily this week. A major stablecoin issuer minted a further $500 million of USDC on the chain, adding depth that supports trading activity across it.
New applications keep launching. Prediction-market platforms have been a particular growth category, attracted by low fees and fast settlement, with new decentralised finance protocols and event-market venues continuing to deploy despite the price environment. Governance has matured through new on-chain voting that empowers stakers.
Against all of that, the token has printed nine consecutive red months.
The bear case explains the gap through two arguments and both deserve a hearing. The first is memecoin dependency: a substantial portion of Solana's fee revenue and transaction volume during the 2024 and 2025 boom came from speculative token launches, and that activity has collapsed. Trading activity across the network's decentralised exchanges has continued slowing. The second is total value locked, which has fallen 56% from its August 2025 peak — a decline that measures capital committed to the ecosystem rather than transactions passing through it.
Those are the honest counterweights to 167 million holder addresses. Address counts can grow while economic activity per address shrinks, and a chain optimised for cheap transactions captures very little value per transaction by design.
The synthesis is that Solana has successfully diversified its activity base away from memecoins toward stablecoins, tokenised assets and prediction markets, and that the replacement activity generates less fee revenue than what it replaced. That is a healthier network and a worse token economy in the near term. It is also exactly the transition Ethereum went through when activity migrated to layer-two networks, and Ethereum trades 61% below its own peak for the same structural reason.
Forward Industries and the Treasury Vehicle Question
The corporate holder cohort deserves attention because it has behaved very differently across the three major assets this year. A listed company has transitioned into a Solana-focused treasury vehicle, holding more than 6.9 million SOL — valued just under $1 billion at the time of disclosure. To support the strategy it launched a $1 billion share repurchase programme and now operates its own validator node on the network.
The structure is meaningfully better designed than its Bitcoin equivalents, and the difference is staking. A Bitcoin treasury company holding a non-yielding asset that has fallen must sell coins to service debt and dividends — which is precisely what the largest Bitcoin holder has now started doing, monetising 3,588 coins for $216 million with authorisation for up to 20,800 more as its net-asset-value multiple collapsed to parity and its funding flywheel stopped.
A Solana treasury company holding a 5% to 7% yielding asset generates income from the position itself. Running a validator adds commission revenue on delegated stake on top of the base yield. That produces an operating business rather than a leveraged directional bet, and it means a drawdown does not automatically force liquidation of principal.
The buyback programme is the tell on management's own view. A company authorising $1 billion of share repurchases while holding just under $1 billion of SOL is signalling that it considers its equity cheap relative to its holdings — the opposite position from a Bitcoin treasury trading at or below net asset value and issuing stock to buy more coins.
The risk is concentration. At 6.9 million SOL against a total supply of 631 million, this single entity holds roughly 1.1% of the network. That is not systemically large, but in a market where daily spot volume runs near $1.7 billion, an orderly disposition would still be visible and a disorderly one would be violent.
The read for the forecast: the Solana treasury cohort is structurally more durable than Bitcoin's and considerably smaller. It supports the floor. It is not the demand source that lifts the price, and it should not be modelled as one.
Derivatives, Positioning and the Macro Tide
The derivatives picture describes a market that has been deleveraging rather than accumulating. Open interest has contracted to roughly $4.81 billion, down 1.60% over 24 hours, from $5.40 billion earlier in the month. Twenty-four-hour trading volume dropped 15.43% to $9.49 billion during one recent session. Funding rates have shown a positive spike, and the long/short account ratio on the largest venue has run at 2.2165 — more accounts positioned long than short.
That combination is mixed rather than clean. Positive funding with a long-skewed retail account ratio into falling open interest means the participants who remain are directionally optimistic while the aggregate position size shrinks. It also means the July 27 break through $75 had liquidation fuel underneath it, which is why the move accelerated once the level went.
Exchange reserves have been declining, which is the constructive counterweight. Coins leaving trading venues reduce immediately available sell-side inventory, and the pattern has persisted through the price weakness in the same way it has for Bitcoin and Ethereum.
The macro tide is the dominant variable and it has been unhelpful. The Federal Reserve held at 3.50% to 3.75% on a 9–3 vote with three dissents favouring a hike, and markets price roughly 80% odds of a September increase. The 30-year Treasury yield hit a nineteen-year high of 5.21%. Second-quarter GDP came in at 1.5% against a 1.8% consensus and core PCE eased to 3.3%.
For the highest-beta major crypto asset, that configuration is close to maximally adverse. SOL is a liquidity asset. Rate expectations, the dollar and overall crypto risk appetite set the tide that lifts or sinks every alternative token, and macro prints matter more to the monthly move than most Solana-specific news. A central bank that might tighten again is not the environment in which a 75%-drawdown asset re-rates.
The correlation caveat cuts the other way too. SOL requires Bitcoin to hold its ground for any Solana-specific catalyst to work. Bitcoin at $64,500 sits pinned above its own $63,300 support with the weakest monthly ETF inflows on record. If that level breaks, Alpenglow and Firedancer will not save this chart.
What the Published Targets Actually Assume
The forecast dispersion across published Solana research is extreme, and reading the assumptions rather than the headline numbers is the only way to use them. Targets for 2026 span from the low double digits to $250, which tells you the professionals disagree on inputs rather than on arithmetic.
The bullish end assumes three things together: Alpenglow activating cleanly, exchange-traded fund flows sustaining and scaling, and a broader crypto liquidity recovery led by Bitcoin. One house carries a base case of roughly $250 by year end on that combination. Another set of models projects $100 to $110 conditional specifically on smooth Alpenglow activation with continued inflows. A widely followed analyst identified $77 as the flip level opening a path to $125 to $130.
The conservative published models cluster far lower. Statistical projections place SOL between $109.63 and $114.11 by end-2026 in one framework, with another 30-day model at $72.57 against an expected range of $69.00 to $76.14. A separate set of expert estimates puts August between $98.96 and $101 and September averaging $82.97 — a spread wide enough to be uninformative.
Prediction markets, which involve real money rather than published opinions, are the most useful reference. They assign a 68% probability to SOL reaching $90 by the end of 2026 and price current sentiment as bearish. That is a market saying a 21% recovery within five months is more likely than not, while declining to price anything more ambitious.
The downside scenarios are specific and worth naming. The identified risk stack is spot inflows weakening or turning negative, decentralised exchange activity continuing to slow, and Firedancer or Alpenglow experiencing deployment delays. Under that combination, one framework identifies $84 as important structural support — a level already well above spot, which tells you how quickly published analysis has been overtaken by price.
The disciplined conclusion is that a $250 target and a $30 target usually differ on two or three inputs, and the assumptions are debatable while the headline number is just those assumptions multiplied out. Position sizing and risk management determine outcomes here far more than calling the monthly move.
The Forecast: $85 Base, $110 Bull, $60 Bear Into the Fourth Quarter
The base case, at roughly 45% probability, is a range between $67 and $85 through the third quarter, resolving toward $85 by the fourth as Alpenglow activation approaches and fund flows continue at their current pace. This requires Bitcoin to hold above $60,000, the daily ETF inflow streak to persist even at modest magnitude, and no deployment incident. Under this path SOL reclaims $75 and then $77, works through the 100-day at $81 that has capped every rally since June, and stalls beneath the 200-day near $95. That is roughly 15% upside and it stops short of the level that would confirm a trend change.
The bull case, around 25%, requires Alpenglow activating cleanly on mainnet in the third quarter alongside a meaningful step-up in fund flows from the current $7 million weekly pace. The new wirehouse distribution — 16,000 advisors, a retail brokerage platform and a 0.14% staked product — is the mechanism that could deliver it. Clearing $95 flips the 200-day and opens $110, with the widely cited $125 to $130 zone reachable if Bitcoin simultaneously breaks its own $67,500 resistance. Note that this scenario still leaves SOL roughly 60% below its record.
The bear case, around 30%, is a Bitcoin breakdown or an Alpenglow delay. Losing $72.38 opens $68 and then the July open at $67. Beneath that, the June low and $60 come into play, and a broader crypto risk event of the kind currently threatened by hedge fund deleveraging in the AI complex could take SOL into the mid-fifties. This is the highest-probability single scenario because the macro configuration — a Fed that may hike in September, a 5.21% long end, and Bitcoin's weakest ETF month on record — argues against high-beta assets specifically.
The disciplined posture at $74.05 is accumulation on weakness toward $67, not chasing strength into $81. The network is measurably stronger than it was a year ago, the institutional wrapper went live this week at a fee and structure that changes the allocator calculus, and the token has fallen for nine straight months through all of it. Those facts will reconcile. The timing runs through Alpenglow and Bitcoin, in that order.
