Natural Gas Price Forecast: Henry Hub Drops to $2.788 as Production Glut Caps the Rally
6-day rally snaps as LNG feedgas falls to 17.3 bcfd and storage hits 7.2% above 5-yr average | That's TradingNEWS
Key Points
- Natural Gas Price Forecast: June Nymex (NG=F) settles down 2.8% to $2.788/mmBtu, giving back gains after closing at the highest level since April 7.
- Day's range printed $2.773–$2.868; 52-week range stretches from $2.483 at the lows to $7.827 at the cycle peak.
- Lower-48 dry gas output hits 110.1 bcfd Monday, up 3.2% YoY, within striking distance of the December 2025 record of 110.6 bcfd.
Natural gas is changing hands at $2.788 per million British thermal units after settling 2.8% lower on the Tuesday session, snapping a six-day winning streak that had pushed front-month June Nymex Natural Gas Futures Price to its highest finish since April 7. The contract gave back 2.5 cents intraday to print at $2.842 before extending the slide into the close, with the day's range sweeping from $2.773 to $2.868 and the 52-week range stretching from $2.483 at the lows to $7.827 at the cycle peak. Monday's 3.13% rally pushed the contract to a four-week high, but the fundamental picture beneath the price action looks materially weaker than the chart suggests. Lower-48 dry gas output remains within striking distance of the December 2025 monthly record at 110.6 bcfd, storage sits 7.2% above the five-year seasonal average, and the LNG export channel is bleeding feedgas demand through the spring maintenance season. The bullish weather trade ran for three days. The bearish supply trade is structural.
The $2.749 Pivot Defines the Entire Setup
Working through the technical map, the near-term range is squeezed between $2.905 on the upside and $2.592 on the downside, with the pivot at $2.749 doing the heavy lifting as the level that determines the next directional resolution. The pivot read matters because it sits roughly halfway between the four-week high and the recent capitulation low, and it is the level where new buyers historically step in to defend a freshly formed bottom. A test of $2.749 that attracts fresh demand would set up a secondary higher bottom — the formation that typically precedes the second leg of a sustainable rally because it combines residual short-covering with genuine new buying. Above the immediate range, the first overhead test sits at $2.905, with the 50-day moving average at $2.987 acting as the structural ceiling that determines whether this short-covering rally extends into something larger. A break of $2.987 with volume opens the path toward the $3.107 intermediate retracement, and that is the level where the technical case actually starts looking constructive on a multi-week horizon.
The Short-Covering Rally That Is Not New Buying
The honest read on the three-day surge that preceded Tuesday's reversal is that it was driven by short-covering rather than fresh institutional accumulation. The selloff from January 30 to April 30 was prolonged in both magnitude and duration, and the first rally off a bottom of that scale almost always reflects bearish positions getting forcibly unwound rather than new capital entering. Smart money does not chase the first leg up. Smart money waits for the pullback into the pivot, watches for the secondary higher bottom to form, and adds size only after the structure confirms. The current setup is precisely that — a market that has rallied hard enough to flush out short positioning but has not yet shown the volume profile that would validate genuine accumulation. The next 5 to 10 sessions will determine whether the secondary higher bottom forms or whether the entire bounce gets retraced into a fresh test of $2.592.
Production Is the Headwind That Will Not Go Away
The supply side of the equation remains the structural problem the bulls cannot solve. Lower-48 dry gas output hit 110.1 bcfd on Monday, up 3.2% year-over-year and within striking distance of the December 2025 monthly record of 110.6 bcfd. The Energy Information Administration has lifted its 2026 production forecast to 109.59 bcfd. Average output across May has slipped slightly to 109.1 bcfd from 109.5 bcfd in April, with low spot prices forcing producers like EQT — the second-largest US gas producer — to temporarily reduce output as they wait for higher prices later in the year. The gas rig count has climbed to 130, only four rigs short of the 134 multi-year high set in February. Production is not rolling over in any meaningful way, and the current dip reflects price-driven discipline rather than structural decline. Until rig counts and output meaningfully retreat, the supply ceiling stays in place and the upside in Natural Gas Futures Price is mechanically capped.
Storage Is Sitting 7.7% Above the Five-Year Average
The inventory picture compounds the bearish supply story. Working gas in storage hit 2,142 billion cubic feet on the week ending April 24 — 7.7% above the five-year seasonal average and nearly 5% above year-ago levels. The latest weekly injection of 79 bcf came in below the 83 bcf consensus expectation but still ran well above the 63 bcf seasonal norm, confirming that the over-supply pattern is structural rather than transitory. The forecast for the week ending May 1 implies a 72 bcf build, modestly trimming the surplus to roughly 7.2% above the five-year baseline from 7.7%. That is a slight tightening, not a fundamental reset. The mild weather that defined the early spring allowed energy firms to inject more gas into storage than usual, and the cushion that built during that window now requires sustained demand or production declines to draw down. Neither catalyst is currently firing at scale.
The Waha Hub Disaster That Is Quietly Destroying Permian Producers
Buried in the supply story sits the Waha Hub pricing collapse that nobody outside the energy desk is talking about loudly enough. Daily Waha prices have averaged below zero for a record 62 consecutive days as pipeline constraints trap gas in the Permian region — the largest oil-producing shale basin in the country. The historical context is stark: Waha prices first averaged below zero in 2019. The negative-day count was 17 in 2019, six in 2020, one in 2023, 49 in 2024, 39 across all of 2025, and a staggering 71 days year-to-date in 2026 alone. The current Waha cash print sits at -$4.16 per mmBtu, with the year-to-date average running at -$2.22 against a positive $1.15 in 2025 and a positive $2.88 across the 2021-to-2025 five-year window. Producers are effectively paying counterparties to take gas off their hands, which mechanically destroys economics for any unhedged Permian operator and forces the kind of associated-gas production cuts that would normally support prices — except the LNG and pipeline takeaway capacity to absorb that gas does not currently exist where it is needed.
LNG Export Maintenance Is the Demand-Side Headwind
The other half of the bearish setup sits in the export channel. Average gas flows to the nine major US liquefied natural gas export terminals fell to 17.3 bcfd through May, down from a monthly record of 18.8 bcfd in April. The pullback reflects the standard spring maintenance cycle at major facilities, and the dip is seasonal rather than structural — but the timing matters because feedgas demand is the swing variable that determines whether the storage surplus can be drawn down through the summer. With LNG flows running 1.5 bcfd below the April peak, the demand side of the balance equation is materially softer than it needs to be to absorb the production surplus. Power burn is the offset that bulls are leaning on, with consumption at 65.5 bcfd on Monday, up 7% year-over-year as below-normal Midwest temperatures lift heating demand into the May 13 window. That single statistic captures why the rally got legs — but mild weather forecasts running near normal through May 20 cap the duration of that demand pop. Cooling demand is now expected to overtake heating demand for the first time this year, which provides a fresh demand pulse but only modestly offsets the LNG pullback.
The Hormuz Disruption Is Reshaping the Global LNG Map
The structural variable that is not yet fully priced into Natural Gas Futures Price is the impact of the Strait of Hormuz closure on global LNG flows. Middle Eastern gas supplies that historically reached European and Asian buyers have been substantially curtailed, and the global market is now scrambling for replacement volumes. US LNG exports sit in a stronger competitive position than they did three months ago because there are fewer alternative cargoes available. The Qatar disruption is the more consequential layer. Iranian strikes have damaged 17% of Qatar's Ras Laffan LNG export capacity, with repairs projected to take three to five years. Ras Laffan accounts for roughly 20% of global LNG supply on its own, which means the world is now operating with a structural LNG deficit that the market has not yet fully repriced. European storage at 32% full sits well below the 45% five-year average, which tells you exactly where the next wave of LNG demand is heading once the Hormuz situation resolves. That structural pull on US export capacity is the single most important medium-term catalyst for Henry Hub pricing — and it is being almost entirely overlooked in favor of the near-term storage and production noise.
International Benchmarks Tell the Real Story
The disconnect between US prices and the rest of the global gas complex is genuinely shocking. The Henry Hub front-month sits at $2.85, while the Title Transfer Facility (TTF) European benchmark trades at $16.57 per mmBtu, and the Japan-Korea Marker (JKM) Asian benchmark sits at $16.86 per mmBtu. That is a roughly 6x premium for international cargoes versus US domestic pricing — the kind of spread that creates massive economic incentive for additional US LNG export capacity. The TTF reading is up materially from $11.68 a year ago and well above the 2025 average of $11.94, while the JKM has surged from $11.83 a year ago to current levels. The five-year averages of $18.51 for TTF and $18.12 for JKM put current pricing meaningfully below the 2021-2025 baseline, but the absolute spread to Henry Hub remains structurally huge. As long as that arbitrage exists, every US LNG facility coming online over the next 24 months — including the Golden Pass project that just delivered first cargoes in late April — pulls bcfd off the domestic market and supports Henry Hub pricing structurally. The market is not yet pricing this transition aggressively, and that is the thesis that gets a holder of June 2026 contracts paid over a multi-year horizon.
Demand Forecasts Are Softening Modestly
LSEG projected average gas demand in the Lower 48 states, including exports, would hold near 97.8 bcfd this week and next — readings that have been trimmed lower from Monday's outlook. The total US demand picture for the current week reads 97.6 bcfd against 103.1 bcfd for the prior week, with next week pulling back further to 97.9 bcfd. Total US supply for the same windows runs 115.0 bcfd, 115.8 bcfd, and 117.0 bcfd respectively, leaving a roughly 18 bcfd surplus that needs to be absorbed by storage injections rather than burn-through demand. Power generation by fuel mix tells the same story — natural gas accounted for 32% of US power generation for the week ending May 8 versus 39% the prior week, with the offset coming from a 15% wind contribution (up from 12%) and a 12% solar contribution (up from 8%). Renewables continue to take share from gas at the margin during shoulder seasons, and that structural pressure compounds the near-term oversupply problem.
Read More
-
Baidu Stock Price Forecast: BIDU Targets $200, Rips 7.86% to $150.94 as Ernie 5.1 Cuts AI Training Costs by 94%
13.05.2026 · TradingNEWS ArchiveStocks
-
XRP Price Forecast: XRP-USD Holds $1.45 as 332,230 Whale Wallets Hit Record
13.05.2026 · TradingNEWS ArchiveCrypto
-
Oil Price Forecast: Brent Holds $107, WTI at $102 as Hormuz Closure Drains Inventories at Record 8.5M bpd Pace
13.05.2026 · TradingNEWS ArchiveCommodities
-
Stock Market Today: S&P 500 Dips, Dow Sinks 228 Points, Nasdaq Holds 26,086 as PPI Shocks at 1.4%; Nvidia, Micron Power Chip Rally
13.05.2026 · TradingNEWS ArchiveMarkets
-
GBP/USD Price Forecast: Cable Breaks 10-Day Lows at 1.3500 as Hot US CPI and Starmer Leadership Crisis Crush Sterling
13.05.2026 · TradingNEWS ArchiveForex
The Oil Spillover Effect That Pulled Gas Higher
Working through the cross-asset linkage, the relationship between WTI Crude Oil Futures and Natural Gas Futures Price is direct enough that energy complex sentiment moves the gas tape regardless of fundamentals. June WTI surged more than 4% on Monday, pulling gas along with it on a session where the headlines were geopolitical rather than supply-driven. That correlation does not change the fundamental case for natural gas — production and storage remain bearish — but it does explain why the chart printed a 3% green session when the underlying data was deteriorating. Tuesday's reversal in WTI down to $102.20 (off 3.95%) and Brent down to $111.40 (off 3.36%) coincided with the natural gas pullback. The energy complex moves as a basket more often than the fundamental story would justify, and any trader sized in natural gas needs to monitor crude as a leading indicator for sentiment shifts that have nothing to do with Henry Hub specifically.
Australia's Policy Stance Adds Another Layer
The supply-side picture extends beyond Hormuz and Qatar into the Australian LNG export framework. Canberra is reconsidering planned LNG policy reforms in light of the broader Middle East energy security picture, prioritizing regional ties over the more aggressive domestic supply requirements that had been on the table. The decision matters because Australia is the second-largest LNG exporter globally, and any policy shift that constrains export volumes pulls additional global demand toward US Gulf Coast cargoes. TotalEnergies has flagged final investment decision momentum on the Papua LNG project before year-end. Russia is attempting to break the Power of Siberia 2 deadlock with a pricing concession that would push Russian gas into Chinese demand and reduce the call on Asian LNG cargoes. The geopolitical chess board is shifting, and every move that takes Asian or European demand toward alternative supplier channels reduces the structural bid for US LNG that the Henry Hub bull case relies on. None of these moves have crystallized fully yet, but the directional risk on the supply-and-demand mosaic is multifaceted.
Northwest Hydropower Conditions Are Quietly Bullish
The hydropower picture in the Pacific Northwest provides a small but meaningful tailwind. NWRFC forecasts at The Dalles Dam show April-September flows at 89% of normal — well above 76% in 2025, 74% in 2024, and 83% in 2023. The October-to-September annual reading sits at 98% versus 80% in 2025 and 77% in 2024. That math means Pacific Northwest hydroelectric generation should run materially stronger in 2026 than the prior several years, which mechanically reduces gas-fired power demand in the West and weighs on regional Henry Hub-linked basis pricing. PG&E Citygate sits at $1.36 versus the $5.47 five-year average, SoCal Citygate at $1.95 versus the $5.71 average — basis differentials reflecting both regional supply abundance and softer hydro-driven demand offsets. The implication for the national picture is modest but real: stronger hydro means weaker incremental gas demand from West Coast utilities, which compounds the production surplus problem in the absence of LNG export pull.
Power Burn Is the Variable to Watch Into Mid-May
The most important short-term variable for whether Natural Gas Futures Price builds a higher floor sits in power-sector consumption. The forecast warming pattern that begins to lift early cooling load through the second half of May is the demand catalyst that natural gas needs to absorb the production surplus without further price weakness. Gelber & Associates flagged the dynamic precisely: if export pull returns as power burn builds into the second half of May, the market will have a stronger case for holding a higher floor without needing geopolitical headlines to carry the price. That is the bull case in its purest form — operational demand recovery offsetting the spring storage build. The bear case is the alternative scenario where mild weather persists, LNG maintenance extends beyond expectations, and storage injections continue running 25% above seasonal norms. Either path can develop in the next 60 days, and the resolution depends almost entirely on which way temperatures break in mid-to-late May.
The Honest Bull Case for Henry Hub
The constructive thesis for Natural Gas Futures Price rests on a specific catalyst stack. Cooling demand is set to overtake heating demand for the first time this year, providing fresh power-sector burn into mid-May. The Hormuz closure is structurally redirecting global LNG demand toward US Gulf Coast cargoes. Qatar's Ras Laffan damage removes 4% of global LNG capacity for three to five years. European storage at 32% full versus the 45% average will require massive winter restocking that pulls heavily on US export volumes. The 6x spread between Henry Hub at $2.85 and JKM at $16.86 creates structural arbitrage that supports incremental US export capacity. Production declines from EQT and other majors at current pricing eventually tighten the supply picture. The technical setup of a higher secondary bottom forming above $2.749 would unlock a path toward the $2.987 50-day moving average and then the $3.107 retracement target. Any one of those catalysts firing meaningfully shifts the trajectory. The question is whether they fire fast enough to outrun the production surplus.
The Honest Bear Case for Henry Hub
The skeptical thesis is equally well-supported. Production sits within 0.5 bcfd of the all-time high and rig counts are climbing back toward the multi-year peak. Storage is 7.2% above the five-year average and the most recent weekly build of 79 bcf ran 25% above seasonal norms. LNG feedgas demand has declined 1.5 bcfd from the April peak as spring maintenance bites. Waha pricing at -$4.16 confirms that physical takeaway capacity in the most prolific basin remains structurally constrained, which means bottlenecks rather than demand constraints are limiting production. Renewable generation share continues to grow at the margin, with wind and solar collectively pulling 27% of weekly US power generation versus a 20% historical baseline. Pacific Northwest hydropower is running well above prior-year levels, reducing regional gas demand. The technical setup of the first rally off a multi-month low is historically a short-covering bounce rather than the start of a primary uptrend, with the smart money waiting for the pullback rather than chasing the first leg up. The bear case does not need a new catalyst. It just needs the production glut to keep producing and the LNG maintenance window to extend by even two weeks.
Positioning Stance: Wait for the Pullback Rather Than Chase the Bounce
Pulling the entire mosaic together for Natural Gas Futures Price, the disciplined call is to avoid chasing the current short-covering rally and to position around the pullback into the $2.749 pivot rather than the $2.842 to $2.905 resistance band. The constructive case rests on the cooling demand transition, the Hormuz-driven LNG redirect, the Qatar capacity loss, the European storage rebuild requirement, and the structural global price arbitrage. The bearish overlay sits on production at near-record levels, storage 7.2% above the five-year average, LNG feedgas decline through spring maintenance, Waha basis at multi-decade lows, and the renewables-driven secular pressure on gas-fired generation. The most asymmetric trade is to buy the pullback into the $2.749 pivot if and when it forms a secondary higher bottom, with stops anchored beneath $2.592 (the recent low) and upside targets layered at $2.905, $2.987 (the 50-day moving average), and $3.107 (the 50% retracement). A confirmed daily close above the $2.987 50-day with volume genuinely changes the structural read and would unlock a path toward $3.20 to $3.40 over the medium term. A failure to defend $2.592 invalidates the constructive thesis entirely and opens the path back to the cycle lows near $2.483. The trade right now is not aggressive accumulation at $2.788 after a 3% reversal, and it is not aggressive shorting either after a 6-day winning streak. The trade is patience — letting the pullback develop, watching whether the pivot at $2.749 attracts new buyers, and committing capital only when the secondary higher bottom confirms. The market that has the production surplus pressing one way and the global LNG redirect pulling the other will eventually resolve directionally. The discipline lies in being on the right side when it does, not in front of the resolution before the trigger fires.