NVD ETF ($6.48) $7.74 Upside Target as Nvidia Loses Huang Before Its $108B Earnings Test

The GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NASDAQ:NVD) traded at $6.48 late Thursday, November 12, 2026, up 10.3% from Wednesday’s $5.87 close. The move mirrors a 5.16% drop in Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) to $164.76 from $173.73. NVD is built to deliver twice the inverse of Nvidia’s daily return, and Thursday showed that structure at its most extreme. At 8:48 a.m. ET, Nvidia announced that co-founder Jensen Huang had resigned as president, CEO and director, effective immediately. CFO Colette Kress became interim CEO. Nvidia shares were already trading at $158.99 premarket, and they fell to $153.80 by 9:32 a.m. before hitting a session low of $148.80. That low sat 14.35% under Wednesday’s close and implied an NVD price of $7.56 at the worst point for Nvidia holders. Buyers then stepped in, pulling Nvidia back to the $164–$165 area and trimming NVD’s gain from 28.7% at the peak to 10.3%. The intraday swing tells the core story of this forecast. NVD is not an investment in the usual sense. It resets its exposure every day, carries a 1.35% expense ratio and loses value over time in volatile, sideways markets. It is a tactical tool for traders who want to profit from, or hedge against, a sharp Nvidia decline over a short window. That window is now open. Nvidia faces its first quarter without Huang, an earnings report on Tuesday, November 17, with no permanent CEO, an unfinished board investigation, and a stock that has already dropped 29.4% in the five weeks before the resignation. NVD’s path over the past three weeks shows how much the Huang story has moved the fund. It closed at $3.99 on October 26. At $6.48, it is up 62% since then. It rose 18.66% on November 5, when Nvidia dropped sharply, and close to 11% on November 10, when the board’s investigation weighed on the stock. Its 52-week range runs from $3.19 to $9.76. The fund holds $35 million in assets across 6.21 million shares, a small fund that trades enormous volume, with 119.18 million shares changing hands on November 10 against a 109.04 million daily average. The argument in this article is that the leadership shock has not run its course. Nvidia’s next test arrives in five days. If the stock retests Thursday’s $148.80 low, NVD reaches $7.74 from its current level. A recovery to Wednesday’s $173.73 close would cancel that view and send NVD back to $5.77.

How NVD Works: Two Times the Inverse, Reset Every Day

NVD’s structure explains both its appeal and its danger. The fund targets −2x Nvidia’s return for a single trading day, before fees and expenses. If Nvidia falls 5% in a session, NVD aims to rise 10%. If Nvidia rises 5%, NVD aims to fall 10%. The fund launched on August 21, 2023 and trades on Nasdaq. GraniteShares gets that exposure through total return swaps rather than short sales. The fund’s November 4 holdings show short Nvidia swaps with Goldman Sachs, Clear Street and TD Cowen, plus cash and cash equivalents as collateral. Each day after the close, the fund rebalances the swaps so its exposure returns to −2x its new net asset value. The daily reset is the feature that matters most. It means NVD tracks −2x Nvidia’s move over a single day closely, but over longer periods its return can drift far from −2x Nvidia’s cumulative move. Consider a simple two-day example. Nvidia falls 10% on day one and rises 11.1% on day two, ending flat. NVD rises 20% on day one and falls 22.2% on day two. A $100 position becomes $120 and then $93.36. Nvidia is unchanged, but NVD has lost 6.6%. This effect, called volatility decay, hurts most when the underlying stock swings hard in both directions without a clear trend. The math works the other way in a strong one-way move. If Nvidia falls 5% three days in a row, the stock loses 14.3% in total. NVD rises 10% three times, compounding to a 33.1% gain, which exceeds twice Nvidia’s cumulative decline. Steady trends reward the daily reset, and choppy markets punish it. The long-term record shows which force usually wins. NVD’s total return over the past year to late October was −50.21%, and since inception its average annual return has been −77.79%. Nvidia’s multi-year rally explains part of that. Volatility decay and the 1.35% fee explain the rest. Those figures are why GraniteShares and every other issuer of single-stock leveraged ETFs describe them as products for short holding periods. The current setup suits that profile. Nvidia faces a binary event on November 17, a leadership vacuum and a stock that has moved 4–14% a day all week. A trader expecting a further drop over the next week can use NVD to express that view with limited capital. A trader holding Nvidia shares can use a small NVD position to hedge against a bad earnings reaction. Neither use calls for holding NVD for months.

From $186.64 to $148.80: Nvidia’s Week of Selling

The selling that drove NVD higher began before Thursday. Nvidia closed at $186.64 on Friday, November 6. On Sunday, November 8, the board announced an independent investigation into reports that Huang had been targeted by a foreign intelligence operation. On Monday, November 9, the stock fell to $178.67, down 4.3%. On Tuesday, November 10, after independent directors hired a former acting U.S. Attorney and his firm to run the probe, it fell to $168.89, another 5.5%. Across Monday and Tuesday the stock lost a combined 9.5%. On Wednesday, November 11, Nvidia bounced 2.9% to $173.73 during the regular session. The bounce did not survive the evening. Reports emerged after the close that the board was preparing to remove Huang. The stock fell to $158.78 in after-hours trading, 14.9% below the November 6 close. The board accepted Huang’s resignation that night, according to the company’s 8-K filing. The announcement came at 8:48 a.m. ET Thursday. By 9:32 a.m. the stock traded at $153.80, 17.6% below the November 6 close. It bottomed at $148.80, then recovered to $164.76 by late afternoon. From the November 6 close to Thursday’s low, Nvidia lost 20.3%. At $164.76, the stock still sits 11.7% below where it started the week. NVD’s daily moves track that sequence. At $5.87 on Wednesday, after falling on Nvidia’s one-day bounce, the fund sat well above its late-October levels. Thursday’s 10.3% gain adds to a run that includes the 18.66% jump on November 5 and the 11% gain on November 10. The scale of the value destroyed is enormous. Nvidia’s market value fell below $4 trillion in early trading for the first time since 2025. At $165.49 the company was valued at $3.99 trillion. The Huang reports erased $515 billion of market value during the week. At the $153.80 price seen after the open, with 24.1 billion shares outstanding, the market cap stood at $3.7 trillion. The stock is down 12% year to date and 25% over six months. Before the resignation, it had already fallen 29.4% in five weeks, driven by midterm election results seen as hostile to data center construction and the growing Huang scandal. The partial recovery Thursday shows two sets of buyers at work. Retail investors bought the drop aggressively; they had already put $42.5 million into six 2x long Nvidia ETFs from Monday through Wednesday, one of the largest three-day inflows on record. Institutional buyers who view the leadership change as a temporary discount also stepped in. Their behavior over the next three sessions will decide whether Thursday’s $148.80 low holds or gets retested.

The Leadership Vacuum: Kress, Jones and an Open Search

Nvidia’s board has named Colette Kress, 59, as interim CEO. She has served as CFO since September 2013 and will keep her finance role until a permanent successor is named. Harvey C. Jones, 73, a board member since 1993 and the former CEO and executive chairman of Synopsys, becomes Nvidia’s first-ever board chair and will lead the search. The board said it will consider internal and external candidates. Kress is a credible interim choice. She has run Nvidia’s finances through its growth from a gaming chip company into the center of the AI build-out, and she knows its customers, supply chain and capital allocation in depth. Investors trust her on numbers. But Nvidia’s value has never rested on financial management. It rested on Huang’s product vision, his relationships with the largest AI customers and governments, and a flat organization in which he reportedly had 60 direct reports. Huang co-founded the company in 1993 and led it for 33 years. He also dismissed the value of a formal succession plan, which leaves the board building one under pressure. Internal candidates include Kress and Ian Buck, who runs Nvidia’s AI computing strategy. An external hire would bring a new leader into a company whose culture and structure grew around one person. Either path takes months, and the market will apply a discount until it sees a permanent CEO with a clear mandate. One portfolio manager described Huang’s exit as the worst-case scenario for the stock, and another called the lack of a succession plan a reason to treat the shares as uninvestable for now. The investigation adds a second layer of uncertainty. Nvidia has not said whether the board’s probe is complete or what it found. The scrutiny began on October 29, when reports surfaced that U.S. intelligence officials had concluded that Alice Huang, a Chinese citizen and former executive at Singapore-based Nvidia customer Megaspeed, was passing information to Beijing. Huang later admitted to an affair with her, and further reports described a relationship with an Nvidia executive who reported to him. Lawmakers called for his resignation. The national security angle raises the risk of tighter export controls and closer scrutiny of Nvidia’s China business, at a time when Huang had argued in Washington for limited restrictions on AI chip exports. For NVD, the vacuum matters because it removes a source of confidence that has historically limited Nvidia’s declines. Under Huang, every sell-off met buyers who trusted him to deliver the next product cycle. Without him, those buyers will demand a lower price before committing, and that leaves room for further downside.

November 17 Earnings: The Binary Event Five Days Away

Nvidia will report third-quarter fiscal 2027 results on Tuesday, November 17, at 1:20 p.m. Pacific time, with the earnings call at 5 p.m. ET. The company confirmed the date after Huang’s resignation. Its August guidance called for revenue of $108.0 billion, plus or minus 2%. For NVD, this is the most important event of the month. Leveraged inverse ETFs move hardest on single-day shocks, and earnings reactions in Nvidia have produced moves of 5–10% in either direction many times. A 10% drop in Nvidia the day after earnings would lift NVD 20% in one session. A 10% rally would cut NVD 20%. Holding NVD through the report is a direct bet on the market’s reaction, not on the numbers themselves. The setup favors volatility. The revenue numbers themselves will likely land close to guidance, because Nvidia’s order book is set months in advance and the quarter closed before the scandal broke. The risk sits in three other places. The first is guidance. Kress will deliver the outlook for the fourth quarter and fiscal 2028 without Huang’s voice behind it. Any cautious language, any sign that customers are pausing orders while they assess the leadership change, or any reference to China export uncertainty would hit the stock. The second is the call itself. Analysts will press management on succession, on the investigation, on whether key engineers plan to stay, and on whether major customers have raised concerns. Nvidia’s answers will shape sentiment more than the quarter’s revenue. The third is positioning. Several brokers cut price targets this week, one of them by half from $400 to $200, and downgrades cited a higher risk premium for leadership change. Some investors will sell before the report to reduce exposure to a binary outcome. Others will wait for the call and react to its tone. The bull case for Nvidia holders is that strong numbers and confident guidance from Kress could produce a relief rally. Demand for AI chips has not disappeared because the CEO left. Data center operators still need Nvidia’s hardware, and many of them have capacity contracts running years ahead. A clean report could lift the stock 5–10%, which would cut NVD 10–20%. That is the main risk to any NVD position held into Tuesday. Weighing both sides, the setup leans toward continued pressure. The scandal has damaged confidence. Guidance from an interim CEO will carry less weight than guidance from Huang. The market tends to sell first and wait for clarity in situations like this, and a five-day window gives sellers time to act before the print.

Semiconductor Rotation: AMD and Broadcom Rise as Nvidia Falls

Thursday’s market showed investors moving money within the chip sector rather than leaving it. AMD rose 3% early in the session and 5.46% at its high, while Broadcom gained 5.21%. The iShares Semiconductor ETF fell only 1%. Nvidia’s 5.16% decline stood out against a sector that held up, a sign that the selling targeted the company’s leadership risk rather than AI chip demand. The rotation has a clear logic. Large AI customers spend tens of billions a year on accelerators. Most buy from Nvidia because its hardware and CUDA software lead the market, but they have been diversifying for two years, with AMD’s MI-series GPUs and Broadcom’s custom ASICs taking larger shares of new data center builds. A leadership change at Nvidia gives purchasing teams one more reason to spread orders across suppliers. Investors bought AMD and Broadcom on Thursday as the most likely beneficiaries of any shift in market share. For NVD traders, the rotation has two implications. First, it confirms that the market sees Nvidia-specific risk, which is exactly the risk NVD captures. A sector-wide sell-off would hit Nvidia alongside its peers. A selective sell-off concentrated on Nvidia, while competitors rise, shows that investors are applying a leadership discount to Nvidia alone. That discount can persist for weeks or months until a permanent CEO is in place. Second, the rotation limits the downside for Nvidia from a broad AI sell-off. If AI demand remained strong across the sector, Nvidia’s decline would reflect only its own problems. The sector’s resilience suggests the market still believes in the AI build-out, and a strong earnings report on November 17 could pull money back into Nvidia from AMD and Broadcom. Leveraged products show how intense the trading has become. GraniteShares’ 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF, NVD’s mirror image, fell 11% on Tuesday and 46% over a month. NVD and its long counterpart both ranked among the most actively traded ETFs on Monday, with NVD trading 94 million shares. Other single-stock inverse products include NVDQ, another 2x inverse fund, NVDS at 1.5x and NVDD at 1x. The broader market reaction also shows how much Nvidia still drives the indexes. The S&P 500 fell 0.8% and the Nasdaq 1.5% at the worst point Thursday, while the Dow rose 0.2%, or 108 points. Technology was the weakest sector in the S&P 500. Indexes recovered part of their losses as Nvidia bounced off its low. Nvidia’s weight in the major indexes means its moves spill over into index funds and portfolios far beyond the stock itself.

Macro Pressure: Hot CPI, a 5.07% 10-Year and Fed Repricing

The macro backdrop adds to the pressure on Nvidia and supports NVD. October CPI rose 0.4% headline and 0.3% core, the third straight 0.3% core reading. The 10-year Treasury yield sits at 5.07%, and the dollar index stands at 103.08, a 19-month high. Futures price an 89% chance of a 25 basis point Fed cut on December 9 and an 11% chance of 50 basis points. Weekly jobless claims of 200,000 and continuing claims of 1.697 million describe a labor market that still holds up, which limits how far the Fed can go. Producer prices arrive Friday, November 13. High yields hit Nvidia harder than most large companies. The stock’s valuation depends on years of continued AI spending growth, and higher discount rates shrink the present value of those future earnings. Nvidia also carries the largest weight in growth indexes and funds, so any rotation away from growth stocks toward value or cash hits it first. With the 10-year above 5%, investors have less reason to pay a premium for growth, and the leadership discount compounds that pressure. Friday’s PPI is the first macro test. A hot reading would push yields higher, add to pressure on growth stocks and support NVD into the weekend. A soft reading would ease the pressure, give tech room to bounce and likely pull NVD lower on Friday. With Nvidia’s earnings due the following Tuesday, the Friday move sets the tone for positioning into the report. The December 9 Fed meeting lies beyond the immediate trading window for NVD, but expectations matter now. A market that prices a December cut at 89% has limited room for a positive surprise. A shift toward a hold or a hawkish cut would push yields up and growth stocks down. A shift toward a 50 basis point cut would rally growth stocks and work against NVD. Leveraged ETF holders carry an extra exposure to macro conditions through volatility. When the VIX and single-stock implied volatility rise, daily moves in Nvidia widen, which magnifies both gains and decay in NVD. The current environment of hot inflation, high yields and a corporate scandal keeps volatility high. That helps NVD if Nvidia trends lower and hurts it if Nvidia chops sideways. The macro picture tilts against Nvidia over the next week. It does not by itself drive the stock lower, but it removes the cushion of easy financial conditions that has supported Nvidia through past setbacks.

Volatility Decay and Fees: The Cost of Holding NVD

Anyone considering NVD needs to understand what it costs to hold. The expense ratio is 1.35% a year, high by ETF standards but small next to the other costs of daily leveraged exposure. The fund also pays financing costs embedded in its swap agreements, and those costs rise with interest rates. With the Fed funds rate at 3.75–4.00%, the cost of maintaining short swap exposure adds to the fund’s drag. The larger cost is volatility decay. Nvidia’s moves this week illustrate the effect. On Monday the stock fell 4.3%, on Tuesday 5.5%, on Wednesday it rose 2.9% and on Thursday it fell 5.2%. Those four sessions took Nvidia from $186.64 to $164.76, down 11.7%. Twice that cumulative decline would be 23.4%. NVD’s compounded return over the same four days, assuming clean daily tracking, came to 23.9%, slightly more than twice Nvidia’s decline, because three of the four days went in NVD’s favor. A strongly trending week benefits NVD. Reverse the pattern and the cost shows up. If Nvidia bounces 5% on Friday and falls 5% on Monday, it ends 0.25% lower. NVD falls 10% and then rises 10%, ending 1% lower, a loss on a period in which Nvidia barely moved. Over weeks of choppy trading, those small losses add up. That is why NVD has lost 77.79% a year on average since launch, even though Nvidia has had several steep declines in that period. The fund also paid an annual distribution of $0.85 per share with an ex-dividend date of December 29, 2025. Leveraged funds often distribute income earned on cash collateral at year-end. A similar distribution in late December 2026 would cut NVD’s price by the payout amount on the ex-date, so traders holding through year-end should account for it. For practical purposes, NVD works best when three conditions line up: a clear expected catalyst, a short holding period of a few days to two weeks, and a belief that the underlying stock will trend in one direction rather than swing back and forth. The November 17 earnings report fits the first two conditions. The third depends on whether the market reads the leadership change as a lasting discount or a temporary shock. Traders using NVD as a hedge for Nvidia shares face a different calculation. A 10% NVD position against a 100% Nvidia position offsets 20% of the stock’s daily moves. That cushions a bad earnings reaction at the cost of some upside on a good one. For a hedge held only through the earnings window, the decay cost is small next to the protection it offers.

NVD Technical Levels: $5.77 Support, $7.56 and $7.74 Resistance

NVD’s technical levels come straight from Nvidia’s chart, converted through the fund’s −2x daily structure. From Thursday’s $6.48 NVD price and Nvidia’s $164.76 reference, the key levels line up as follows. On the upside for NVD, the first resistance is $7.22, which matches Nvidia at $153.80, the 9:32 a.m. price Thursday. Above that sits $7.56, the session high for NVD and the level that matched Nvidia’s $148.80 low based on Wednesday’s close. The target of $7.74 corresponds to Nvidia retesting $148.80 from its current $164.76, a 9.69% decline that would lift NVD 19.4% if it happened in one session. A break below $148.80 in Nvidia would open further NVD upside, with $140 in Nvidia corresponding to NVD near $8.37 on a single-day move. On the downside for NVD, the first support is $6.13, matching Nvidia at $170, a recovery of 3.2%. Below that sits $5.77, which matches a return to Wednesday’s $173.73 close. That is the level at which the market would have erased Thursday’s entire leadership discount. A further rally to $178.67, Monday’s close, would push NVD toward $5.43, and a full recovery to $186.64, the pre-scandal close, would put NVD near $4.76. These conversions assume single-day moves. If Nvidia takes several sessions to reach a level, NVD’s price will differ because of daily compounding. In a steady decline NVD will end higher than the single-day math suggests; in a choppy path it will end lower. Traders should treat the conversions as guides, not exact prices. The trade setup from $6.48 works out as follows. The upside to $7.74 is $1.26, or 19.4%. The downside to $5.77 is $0.71, or 11.0%. That gives a reward-to-risk ratio of 1.77 to 1. It is not the most favorable ratio, but it reflects the reality of a leveraged inverse product: the downside comes faster than the upside if the underlying reverses. Position size matters more than the ratio. NVD can move 20% in a day around earnings, so a small allocation limits the damage from a wrong call. Nvidia’s own chart supports the target. Thursday’s $148.80 low formed on panic selling in the first hour, and partial recoveries from panic lows are common. Retests of those lows in the following days are also common, especially when a catalyst like earnings arrives before the shock has fully settled. The $148.80 level is likely to be tested again if guidance disappoints or the investigation produces new headlines.

Positioning and Flows: Retail Buying the Dip, Leveraged Funds in Focus

Positioning data show a split market. Retail investors have bought Nvidia’s decline aggressively. From Monday through Wednesday, they put $42.5 million into six 2x long Nvidia ETFs, one of the largest three-day inflows on record for those products. Thursday’s partial recovery from $148.80 to $164.76 drew more retail buying, as traders who missed past Nvidia dips moved quickly. Retail demand of this size has supported Nvidia through past sell-offs, and it explains much of Thursday’s rebound. Institutional positioning tells a different story. Brokers cut price targets and ratings during the week, citing higher strategic, organizational and execution risk and arguing for a lower valuation multiple. Some large investors described the stock as off-limits until a permanent CEO is named. Funds that manage risk against benchmarks may reduce Nvidia overweights before earnings to cut exposure to an uncertain report. Institutional selling of that kind tends to arrive in steady blocks over several sessions. The split matters for NVD. If retail buying keeps absorbing institutional selling, Nvidia will hold in the $160–$170 range and NVD will drift lower through decay and modest Nvidia gains. If institutional selling overwhelms retail support, Nvidia will retest $148.80, and NVD will reach its target. History offers a guide. Retail dip-buying tends to provide short-term support, but sustained institutional selling usually wins over a period of weeks when the cause is structural rather than temporary. A CEO departure without a successor is structural. NVD’s own volume reflects the attention. The fund traded 119.18 million shares on November 10 against a 109.04 million daily average, and 94 million shares on Monday. For a fund with $35 million in assets, that volume is remarkable. It shows NVD being used as a short-term trading vehicle, with shares changing hands many times a day. High volume keeps spreads tight and makes it easy to enter and exit, which is the main thing a short-term trader needs. Huang’s own holdings are a wildcard. He owns 811.5 million Nvidia shares, 3.4% of the company, worth $125 billion at $153.80. He has said nothing about his plans for the stake. Any sign that he intends to sell, even gradually through a trading plan, would weigh on the stock. A statement that he will hold would ease that fear. Executives who leave under scrutiny often face restrictions on selling during investigations, which may limit near-term supply. The market has not priced in a large Huang sale, and any news on that front would move both Nvidia and NVD.

Bull Case for Nvidia: Why NVD Could Give Back Its Gains

A credible forecast has to weigh what could go wrong for NVD. The case for an Nvidia rebound is substantial. First, demand for AI chips does not depend on who runs the company. Data center operators, cloud providers and AI labs have committed hundreds of billions of dollars to build-outs that need Nvidia hardware. Many of those orders are locked in through 2027. The August guidance of $108.0 billion for the quarter shows the scale of that demand, and the quarter closed before the scandal broke. Second, Nvidia’s product roadmap is set. The company’s next generations of GPUs and networking products are designed, and many are in production. The engineers who built them remain. Leadership changes affect strategy over years, not products over quarters. If Kress delivers a clean report and confident guidance on November 17, the market may decide that the leadership discount has gone too far. Third, the valuation has reset. At $164.76, Nvidia trades well below its levels of a month ago, after a decline of more than 20% over thirty days and 29.4% in five weeks. Value buyers who passed on Nvidia at higher prices may step in. Retail investors have already shown willingness to buy. Fourth, the board acted decisively. Investors often punish uncertainty more than bad news. With Huang gone, Jones in place as chair and a search underway, the worst uncertainty has passed. Markets sometimes rally once the feared event has happened, a pattern traders describe as selling the rumor and buying the news. Thursday’s recovery from $148.80 may have been the first sign of that. Fifth, short covering could fuel a sharp rally. Traders who shorted Nvidia during the week, including through inverse ETFs, would face losses on a strong earnings reaction. Covering those positions could add to buying pressure and push the stock up quickly. If these forces prevail, Nvidia could recover to $173.73 or higher within days, cutting NVD to $5.77 or lower. A 10% post-earnings rally would cut NVD 20% in a single session. That is the main risk of holding NVD through November 17. The strength of the bull case argues for tight risk management on any NVD position. It does not cancel the bearish setup, which rests on a leadership vacuum, a pending investigation, hot macro data and an earnings report delivered by an interim CEO. Both cases are live. The balance of risk favors further Nvidia weakness before the report and a volatile reaction after it.

Catalysts Ahead: PPI Friday, Earnings Tuesday, Investigation Findings

NVD’s next moves depend on a short list of events. Friday’s PPI report on November 13 comes first. A hot reading would push yields higher and weigh on growth stocks, supporting NVD. A soft reading would give tech room to bounce. The second catalyst is Nvidia’s earnings on Tuesday, November 17, after the close. The report sets up the single biggest one-day move for NVD this month. Watch guidance, comments on customer demand, any change in the company’s China outlook and how Kress handles questions on succession and the investigation. NVD’s reaction will come in after-hours trading Tuesday and the regular session Wednesday. The third catalyst is the board investigation. Nvidia has not said whether the probe has finished or what it found. Any report of findings, especially one involving national security, export controls or misuse of company resources, would hit the stock. A clean finding would help. Reports have already raised allegations of a third relationship, which shows the story may still produce headlines. The fourth catalyst is the CEO search. Any sign of a permanent appointment would reduce the leadership discount. An internal choice like Kress or Ian Buck would signal continuity. An outside hire with a strong record would also reassure investors. A long, public search would keep the discount in place. The fifth catalyst is Washington. Huang had close ties to the administration and argued for limited export controls. Lawmakers called for his resignation, and the scrutiny could lead to tighter rules on chip exports to China. Any new restrictions would hit Nvidia’s revenue outlook and support NVD. The sixth catalyst is Huang’s stake. Any filing or statement about his 811.5 million shares would move the stock. A planned sale would weigh on Nvidia. A commitment to hold would support it. The final catalyst is the broader AI trade. Thursday’s selling hit neocloud companies, the newer AI data center operators that rent out computing power, alongside Nvidia. If AI spending fears spread, Nvidia’s decline could deepen. If AI stocks recover, Nvidia’s leadership discount will narrow faster. The concentration of catalysts in the next five sessions makes this one of the most active windows for NVD since the fund launched. That favors short, tactical positions with clear exit levels.

Verdict: A Tactical NVD Trade to $7.74 Into Earnings, Out Above $173.73

NVD rose 10.3% to $6.48 on November 12 as Nvidia fell 5.16% to $164.76 after Jensen Huang resigned as CEO, president and director. The stock hit $148.80 in the first hour, 14.35% below Wednesday’s close, before buyers pulled it back. Nvidia has lost 11.7% this week and more than 20% over a month, erasing $515 billion of market value and dropping below a $4 trillion valuation. Colette Kress takes over as interim CEO, Harvey Jones becomes the company’s first board chair, and the search for a permanent leader has just started. The board’s investigation remains open. Earnings arrive Tuesday, November 17, with $108.0 billion of revenue guidance to defend. The bearish case for Nvidia, and therefore the bullish case for NVD, is strong over the next week. Nvidia has lost the founder who defined its strategy for 33 years, with no succession plan in place. Several brokers cut price targets, one by half. The market applied a leadership discount Thursday and has reason to keep it until a permanent CEO is named. Macro conditions add pressure, with a 5.07% 10-year yield and sticky inflation. Investors rotated into AMD and Broadcom, signaling that the selling targets Nvidia specifically. Interim leadership will deliver guidance under heavy scrutiny. The risks for NVD are just as clear. Retail buyers keep absorbing Nvidia’s declines. AI chip demand is locked in through 2027. A clean earnings report and confident guidance could trigger a 5–10% rally and cut NVD 10–20% in a session. The fund loses value over time in choppy markets, as its −77.79% average annual return since launch shows, and it carries a 1.35% expense ratio plus swap financing costs. The verdict is a tactical, small NVD position from $6.48, held into and through November 17, with an upside target of $7.74. That level matches a retest of Nvidia’s $148.80 low. The stop sits at $5.77, which matches Nvidia recovering to Wednesday’s $173.73 close. That gives a reward-to-risk ratio of 1.77 to 1. Position size should stay small given NVD’s 20% one-day swing potential around earnings. Holding beyond the post-earnings session is not recommended unless Nvidia breaks below $148.80, in which case the next NVD level near $8.37 comes into view on a move to $140. NVD is the right tool for this moment: a short window, a clear catalyst and a stock under pressure. It is the wrong tool for anything longer than that, and traders should treat it accordingly.

That's TradingNEWS