IWMI ETF Price Forecast: 14% Yield at ~$50 Riding the Small-Cap Rotation

IWMI ETF: Small-Caps, Double-Digit Yield And The Great Rotation Trade

IWMI ETF price, yield and current positioning

NYSEARCA:IWMI closed around $50.07 on January 30, trading inside a 1-day range of $49.85–$50.35 and a 52-week range of $38.15–$51.28. At these levels, the NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF is sitting within roughly 3–4% of its all-time high, while still offering a headline distribution yield of about 13.5–14.0% based on the latest monthly payout annualized. For an income product tied to small-cap equities, that combination—price near the top of the range, yield deep into double digits—is exactly why IWMI is attracting attention as a leveraged way to play both small-cap mean reversion and the “great rotation” out of mega-cap AI winners into cheaper parts of the U.S. equity market.

IWMI ETF structure: Russell 2000 exposure plus OTM covered calls

Under the hood, IWMI ETF gains its equity exposure by holding VTWO, the Vanguard Russell 2000 Index ETF, and then writes covered calls on a portion of that small-cap portfolio. The cost structure is clear: VTWO charges about 0.07%, while IWMI adds 0.61%, so the total expense ratio sits near 0.68%, expensive versus a plain index ETF but standard for an actively managed options overlay product. The critical design choice is that IWMI sells out-of-the-money (OTM) calls, not at-the-money calls. That means it harvests option premium, but still leaves room for capital appreciation before upside is capped. This is why the fund has been able to participate meaningfully in the small-cap rally and still maintain a 13%+ cash yield—you’re not handing away every dollar above spot, only the tail of the distribution beyond the chosen strikes.

Small-caps vs mega-caps: valuation spread driving the IWMI ETF thesis

The core macro argument behind IWMI ETF is the valuation gap between small-caps and mega-caps. The Russell 2000 is running near 19.5× earnings, while the S&P 500 trades closer to 31.3× and the Nasdaq-100 around 37.8×. That’s a spread of roughly 12–18 P/E turns in favor of small-caps. When investors finally decide that paying almost 40× earnings for mega-cap AI stories like MSFT, NVDA, AMZN, PLTR is no longer a free lunch, they need somewhere to rotate. The Russell 2000—through IWMI ETF—offers broad U.S. exposure at a much lower multiple, but with upside linked to any catch-up trade in small-caps. IWMI overlays that structural valuation advantage with option income, turning the rotation theme into a cash-generating trade rather than a pure beta bet.

Macro backdrop: rate-cutting cycle and small-cap beta for IWMI ETF

Historically, small-caps outperform large-caps when the Fed moves from hiking to cutting. Falling base rates reduce financing costs, support refinancing, and compress discount rates faster for companies whose cash flows are more back-loaded and more sensitive to domestic demand—the exact profile of many Russell 2000 constituents. As the market increasingly prices a rate-cutting cycle, that backdrop becomes a tailwind for IWMI ETF, because its equity base is exactly that small-cap cohort that tends to outperform in easing environments. The twist is that IWMI monetizes the accompanying volatility: when the market debates the timing and size of cuts, implied volatility across small-caps tends to stay elevated, which inflates call premiums and supports the fund’s high cash distribution.

Volatility and option premium: why IWMI ETF can maintain a ~14% yield

The sustainability of a 13.5–14% yield depends on two conditions: a reasonably high implied volatility level in the Russell 2000, and a healthy net asset value (NAV) base. Small-caps have been more volatile than the S&P 500, giving IWMI richer call premiums than a similar strategy on SPY. Every OTM call IWMI sells is a trade that converts future upside uncertainty into immediate cash flow, and small-cap volatility feeds that machine. The rally in small-caps since late 2024 has also lifted IWMI’s NAV, which mathematically supports higher dollar-amount premiums for the same percentage of notional overwritten. Combine higher underlying volatility with a larger NAV base, and you get a yield profile that can legitimately sit around mid-teens as long as the Russell 2000 remains an active, choppy market rather than a dead range.

Performance scorecard: IWMI ETF vs VTWO, QQQ and peers

Since launch, IWMI ETF has delivered a CAGR around the mid-teens, roughly 14.3%, compared with about 15.7% for VTWO over the same period. That slight underperformance is exactly what you would expect from a covered call overlay during a mostly bullish equity regime—the calls have capped some upside. However, that result is significantly better than many covered call products that use at-the-money calls and almost completely flatten price appreciation. Over the most recent six-month window, IWMI’s price gain of about 8.7% compares with 17.1% for VTWO, the gap reflecting a particularly strong period for small-caps where upside was partially sold via options. Crucially, when you add back double-digit cash distributions, total return has still been competitive not only with VTWO but has outperformed some AI-heavy income peers like JEPQ, QQQI or GPIX, and even at times the Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) on a total-return basis during phases when mega-cap AI names corrected and small-caps rallied.

Drawdowns and risk profile: what IWMI ETF investors are really signing up for

The covered call overlay does not protect against deep bear markets. When small-caps sell off aggressively, IWMI drops with them. Early in 2025, IWMI’s share price fell roughly 13.1% during a drawdown period, versus a decline of about 11.8% for VTWO. That slight underperformance reflects the fact that the option overlay doesn’t fully offset equity losses when the slide is sharp and sustained. Small-cap balance sheets are generally weaker than large-caps, and sectors overweighted in the Russell 2000—financials, health care, industrials—can be hit harder when credit spreads blow out or growth expectations crack. Investors in IWMI ETF are effectively long higher-beta domestic cyclicals, long volatility income, and long small-cap valuation mean reversion, while accepting deeper interim drawdowns than a diversified large-cap index.

AI risk, concentration and why IWMI ETF is an “AI-bubble hedge”

One of the selling points repeatedly highlighted for IWMI ETF is its very low correlation to mega-cap AI leaders. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq-100 have become heavily dependent on fewer than a dozen names. If the market ever decides that paying almost 40× forward earnings for AI-driven growth is too optimistic, those indices can correct hard even if the broader economy remains intact. IWMI’s Russell 2000 exposure is structurally underweight those giants and therefore offers a hedge against an AI-de-rating. In a scenario where the “Magnificent 7” and related AI trades trade sideways or down while the rest of the market catches up, IWMI ETF can benefit from both capital rotation into small-caps and persistent option premium supported by higher cross-asset volatility as leadership rotates.

Fee drag, tax profile and the income investor’s angle on IWMI ETF

The 0.68% total expense ratio is a permanent drag, but it must be judged relative to what investors receive: an actively managed options program, small-cap exposure, and a 13%+ yield paid monthly. For a pure total-return investor with a long time horizon and no need for cash, buying VTWO or the Russell 2000 directly is more efficient. For a retiree or income-oriented investor who prefers monthly cash flows and is willing to give up some upside, IWMI’s fee is defensible. On the tax side, part of the distribution can come from option premiums and potentially tax-advantaged sources, depending on implementation, which can be more efficient than simply selling shares to raise cash. Investors should still check local tax treatment, but structurally IWMI ETF is designed as a high-income wrapper rather than a raw growth vehicle.

Final verdict on IWMI ETF: Buy, Sell or Hold at ~$50?

Pulling everything together—price near $50.07, a 52-week range of $38.15–$51.28, a 13.5–14% yield, a sizeable valuation discount for small-caps versus mega-caps, a likely rate-cutting cycle that historically favors the Russell 2000, and a covered call design that has already delivered double-digit total returns since inception—the risk/reward for NYSEARCA:IWMI is still attractive. Upside is structurally capped versus a pure small-cap ETF, and drawdowns in a deep recession will be painful, but the combination of high current income and macro tailwinds for small-caps argues in favor of staying on the front foot. On balance, at current levels and given the data, IWMI ETF is a Buy, with a clearly bullish stance for income-seeking investors who understand they are trading away some long-term capital appreciation for a high, volatile but compelling monthly cash stream tied to the ongoing great rotation into cheaper U.S. small-caps.

That's TradingNEWS